It never happened...to understand, you're gonna need this...
There's a birther legalese parsing algorithm that helps decipher the hidden message in Hawaiian Officials' public statements. It's like backwards masking...only more sciencey.
Posted on 01/02/2013 2:23:57 PM PST by butterdezillion
Now that the R's have caved and Obama is in full-gloat mode, let's move on to the Achilles' heel scary enough to Obama that his people have made threats to keep it quiet: football. Or, a football analogy, I should say. Currently there’s a call on the field more important than any call in any BCS game, and the stakes could not be higher:
Hawaii has confirmed that Obama's long-form image is a forgery and the record they have is not legally valid; the registrar cannot verify Obama's date of birth, city and island of birth, or parents' names - all of which were submitted for verification and by law must be verified if they can be. (You can look up the explanation of how we know this, at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf . )And all of which must be known before a person can qualify to be President.
We've all been wanting the question answered and now it's been answered in a certified legal document from the proper HI authority.
That call matches the forensic evidence that Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his lead investigator, Mike Zullo, have sworn to in affidavits. It matches the evidence I've submitted in a fraud and subornation of perjury criminal case against DNC Attorney Bob Bauer. It matches the HDOH's alteration of the 1960-64 birth index to include non-valid records. It matches the minimum of 3 birth certificate numbers from 1961 that the HDOH has switched around recently, and the forged death certificate for Virginia Sunahara.
So that's the call on the field. Obama has no birth facts that are to be presumed accurate "on their face" (prima facia). The claims on his non-valid record are legally presumed to NOT be true, and all the instant replays (evidence) seen so far confirm the ruling on the field.
If Obama wants to overturn the call on the field he has to call for a review and show the refs something big enough to overturn the call. HI statute says the record has to be presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body if Obama wants to make a case for overturning his record's current legal status of non-validity. That's not Congress; Congress is legislative. Congress can't decide this, according to Hawaii law. But if Obama doesn't call for a review (and he's fought it for over 4 years now), Congress (or any Congress member, presumably) can file a lawsuit to force a review. Or they can just tell him the call on the field stands and every electoral vote for Obama is disqualified for being fraudulently-obtained. Hit him with an unsportmanlike conduct penalty while they're at it.
Please call your Senators and Representatives and tell them that the official call on the field is that Obama has no legally-established birth facts and thus cannot qualify to be President. Tell them to either disqualify the electoral votes that are known to have been acquired through fraudulent nomination papers, or call for a review of the play by filing a lawsuit to compel a legal determination of Obama's birth facts.
The electoral vote certification is on Friday. Not much time. Please help.
Can you post a source for this? When did the State of Hawaii do this?
Here’s the clickable link to the explanation for how we know Onaka confirmed a non-valid record: http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf .
The secretaries seem to be in full CYA mode, sheltering the Congressmen from seeing this information. When you call, ask them WHEN they will relay the message to the Congressman. Ask them to make sure that the Congressman sees a fax sent by Nellie Ristvedt on Dec 20-21 within the next day, since the information is urgent and critical.
You’re forgetting one important detail, mate....
The law no longer matters.
““We hope that issuing certified copies of the original Certificate of Live Birth to
President Obama will end the numerous inquiries related to his birth in Hawai„i,” Hawai„i
Health Director Loretta Fuddy said. “I have seen the original records filed at the
Department of Health and attest to the authenticity of the certified copies the
department provided to the President that further prove the fact that he was born in
Hawai„i.”
It’s at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf .
The short version: AZ SOS Ken Bennett asked Onaka to verify a bunch of stuff, including Obama’s date of birth, city and island of birth, and parents’ names. HI law requires Onaka to verify everything he CAN verify, and Onaka’s response didn’t include a verification of any of those critical facts.
Onaka did verify that the claims on the White House BC are also what’s on the real record. If the record was valid he’d thus have to verify those claims as presumably true. So the only lawful reason for Onaka not to verify the truth of those claims is if the record itself is non-valid and so Hawaii doesn’t presume the claims to be true.
Onaka also refused to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” or that the information contained in the White House image is “identical to” the information in the original record.
So who do you believe - the unsworn remarks of the same liars who altered the 1960-64 birth index so that it would include non-valid records, or the sworn, certified statement of the official legally required to tell the truth?
Which would you say generally carries more weight in legal matters?
If we let this go now that we’ve got legal confirmation of Obama’s failure to qualify, then that’s where we’re at.
And anybody who isn’t shaking in their boots at that thought has a very poor imagination. Let me help jog the imagination: the same Columbia University buddies who are now visiting the White House... planned how to exterminate the 25 million people they expected to resist “re-education” when the communist coup was completed. The last step in the coup is the confiscation of our guns.
Again, I lost my ping list so I’m just pinging a few I can think of off-hand.
I called a few Congress members today, and the reactions of the secretaries lead me to believe that they are not showing my letter to the member of Congress. Ignorance is bliss until Bill Ayers’ bloody boot lands itself in your butt. If none of these people will step up to the plate now, America is really and truly over. Please help me get the word out and light some fires underneath these comfortable behinds.
yeah it’s gonna be fun. especially when the armed services, the ones these libs love, tells bath house barry to “Go f@ck yourself sir.” when he tells them to round us up.
It seems to me that a battle/war is inevitable. The only question at this point is whether it’s going to happen before, or after, Obama shreds everything American about this country. If the Congress folks are worried about riots, another Soros run on the bank to collapse the economy, etc, I quote Aragorn from “Lord of the Rings”:
“Open war is upon you, whether you would risk it or not.”
I’ll also quote Abe Lincoln, who got it from Jesus Christ: “A nation divided against itself cannot stand.”
I have 3 nephews in the USMC. I asked one of them yesterday, whether anybody talks about what happened in Benghazi. He said most of them are apathetic and just do what they’re told. I do wonder how the numbers will fall when it comes to the moment of truth. Propaganda artists always make it seem like right is wrong, and the undiscerning are easily deceived.
Well, the beat goes on against the Liar-In-Chief...
- - - - - - - - - -
“Newly Found Case Authority Filed In Florida Electoral Challenge: Florida Court Has Jurisdiction To Rule On Obama’s Eligibility & Fraud
As reported here Attorney Larry Klayman filed a motion seeking an emergency rehearing in the Florida electoral challenge. The case was originally dismissed last month by Judge Kevin Carroll. On Monday Klayman filed a notice of newly discovered case authority that shows the Florida court has jurisdiction to rule on Obama’s eligibility and fraud. EXCERPT:
NOTICE OF NEWLY FOUND CASE AUTHORITY AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
Plaintiff Michael Voeltz, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Newly Found Case Authority and Supplement to Motion For Rehearing.
In conducting further research, Plaintiff has come across the case of Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 2000) (Exhibit 1), legal authority that was somehow overlooked by the court and the parties.
At issue here is the applicability of Florida Election law to the presidential election. In considering the presidential election, the Florida Supreme Court ruled:
“It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.” Id. at 1290-1291.
The Florida Supreme Court then concluded, “[i]n sum, Florida’s statutory scheme simply makes no provision for applying its rules one way for presidential elector elections and another way for all other elections. “ Id. at 1291.
The Supreme Court of Florida has thus conclusively already ruled that this court has jurisdiction to consider and rule upon Plaintiff Voeltz’s election challenge on eligibility and fraud. This court must respectfully grant an evidentiary hearing. There should logically be no need for Plaintiff to notice up a hearing, as this court had already committed itself to provide a hearing before it incorrectly and precipitously dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint. Given the requirement under Florida law that election disputes be adjudicated quickly, this court must respectfully set an evidentiary hearing and adjudicate the issues at the earliest time practicable. Moreover, the case is not moot. Indeed, in the now famous 2000 Bush/Gore election challenge cases, this Court proceeded to adjudicate the parties’ dispute long after the Florida Electors had met.
Plaintiff is available January 2 or 3, 2013 for a telephonic status conference to set the date for a specially set evidentiary hearing on the merits, as the law is now clear that one is required and that the prior dismissal order should be immediately vacated and set aside, as it was legally in error. [...] ... continued below... - Klayman’s Notice via the Obots @ BR and Jack Ryan”
It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.”
It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.
It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.
I think the Minority Soldiers are a lot more likely to comply with Obama’s orders vs. Anglos.
He will send the minority soldiers to the suburbs and the Anglos to the inner city with a peacekeeping mission, the others will be on search and destroy missions.
I have no doubts about this.
It never happened...to understand, you're gonna need this...
There's a birther legalese parsing algorithm that helps decipher the hidden message in Hawaiian Officials' public statements. It's like backwards masking...only more sciencey.
I notice the usual OB fools come pinging along...
we got this and Benghazi to fight the usurper
“The law no longer matters”
I doubt you actually believe that, or you would not be following these threads. I do not presume to know your heart and many of us are simply in shock that our country has fallen this fast.
We need people like YOU to do what is still possible, so that the worst of our fears are not realized. It is still possible to restore our republic.
Yawn, yes the ole Fukino statement where she violated HI statute by not submitting documentation? As if the conflicting statements over the years by HI Dept of Health on such a simple matter wasn’t an utter joke.
LOL, Win
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.