Posted on 01/02/2013 8:46:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind
To listen to all the moaning out of the House of Representatives yesterday, you could be forgiven for thinking that the Republicans are losing the fiscal battle in Washington.
Actually, they're winning.
To see this, you just need to step back and look at the tax deal and the country's fiscal trends from a broader perspective.
Yesterday, the American government voted to extend almost all of the Bush Tax Cuts permanently.
Not temporarily, as a stimulus measure.
Permanently.
Ever since the Bush Tax Cuts were first enacted in 2001--temporarily, as a stimulus measure--one goal of the Republican party has been to "make the Bush Tax Cuts permanent."
For most of the last decade, this goal has seemed like an extremist view: Making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent would drastically reduce the federal government's revenue. It would also increase inequality and balloon the national debt and deficit--so how could we possibly justify doing that?
And yet now, suddenly, almost all of the Bush Tax Cuts are permanent.
The Republicans also got a good deal for the investor and owner class, making the Bush dividend tax cut permanent. This saves a lot of money in tax bills for America's wealthier investors.
And the Republicans also socked it to the working class, something that often seems to be an unstated goal of the party. How?
By not extending the payroll tax cut.
This payroll tax cut put up to an extra $2,000 a year in the pockets of everyone who works. The payroll tax hits everyone who earns wages, including the richest Americans, but it's a highly "regressive" tax: It takes a much bigger percentage of the income of those who earn less than $110,000 a year than it does from the richest Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
IS THIS HOW THE TYPICAL LIBERAL MIND THINKS ABOUT THE DEBT CEILING?
EXCERPT:
The next government fight will be about the debt ceiling, and the Republicans are already mobilizing to hold the country hostage and demand entitlement cuts in exchange for not forcing the U.S. to default. And it seems reasonable to assume that, no matter how crazy and irresponsible this behavior is, the Republicans will probably extort some spending-cut concessions in exchange for agreeing to allow the United States Of America to honor its commitments.
So, it’s likely that we’ll get some entitlement spending cuts before long.
And then there’s the big picture, which is also important. The Republicans are winning there, too.
Schmuck.
Everyone is about to watch their country sink. People like this live in a world of their mind.
Looks like with all of Hussein’s victories against America, his handlers and Big Media are concerned that the leftist freaks will lose some of their hatred.
There are no such things as permanent tax cuts. Future Congresses can do whatever they want. The only thing about the Obama tax cuts is that they will not sunset like the Bush tax cuts. If that is such a great victory, I can understand why the Reps are such poor negotiators.
Republicans are very good at winning in their dreams but fall short in the real world every time....
how dare the rich elitists expect the working class to put away 2% of their wages for retirement!
THE AUDACITY!
Apparantly, Obama’s “deal” wasn’t fair share enough for the leftist crowd.
If this is “winning”, losing must REALLY suck.
( Making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent would drastically reduce the federal government’s revenue. )
Actually it does not DRASTICALLY reduce the Federal Governments revenue, it just reduces it from that source.Its the Government. They will find a way to take more money from us. But the writer makes the tax cuts that sound like a bad thing. The “bad thing” is a Federal Government that is so bloated, so inept, so out of control in spending that NO AMOUNT OF TAXATION would ever be enough to feed it.........
Please keep the writer of this screed away from sharp objects.
the libtards will keep on spending and will just finance a larger deficit with more creation of money out of thin air and more borrowing from China.
[And the Republicans also socked it to the working class, something that often seems to be an unstated goal of the party. How? By not extending the payroll tax cut.]
The payroll tax partially funds Social Security, Medicare and Workers Comp. The cut couldn’t be made permanent without creating a new funding mechanism—like borrowing the money from another country.
Nonsense. It’s just that the democrats have found more effectives methods to redistribute wealth and socialize the economy than the tax code.
The tax battle just distracts us from the real crimes taking place.
It’s good for you Yankee....You like, make you proud.
The author teaches at the Tokyo Rose school of propaganda.
Gee, I never realized congressional Republicans were that clever. And, I certainly didn't realize they were that skilled.
re: “And the Republicans also socked it to the working class, something that often seems to be an unstated goal of the party. How?
By not extending the payroll tax cut.”
Ok, this is a clear case of “Don’t believe your eyes, just believe what I’m telling you.”
The Dems have been wanting to get rid of the Bush Tax cuts since its inception. They wanted to raise tax rates on the wealthier Americans. They didn’t want to substantially reduce government spending (except in Defense).
Let’s see - Who won the election?? Wasn’t it the Dem/Communists by a wide margin? Who’s setting the agenda here?
They got 99% of what they wanted. How is that Republicans winning (not that they fought very hard)? It looked to me like a bloodbath against all Americans and our economy - a big win for the Progressives.
This article was obviously written for low-information voter consumption. Blame the coming collapse and pain that we are causing on the opponents.
How will our kids and grandkids compete with Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, and the Czech Republic..
We need:
* A top to bottom review off all programs as to the validity of their existense prior to downsizing re-engineering all of them to get our expenses below our GDP.
* That means cutting Fedzilla from 25% of GDP to somewhere between 17 and 20%.
* That is a minium of a 30% cut.
That doesn't get into the fact we can't compete tax code wise. i.e. the Czech Republic with:
* A 15% Flat Tax
* A 19% Business Tax ( and I think 100% captial purchase deductions year one )
* 15% Cap Gains.
* and retirement and what I think is dividend income by another name at 5%.
Young, Donald Don
Womack, Steve
Bilbray, Brian
Bono Mack, Mary
Calvert, Ken
Denham, Jeff
Dreier, David
Gallegly, Elton
Herger, Walter Wally
Lungren, Daniel E.
McKeon, Howard Buck
Miller, Gary
Royce, Edward Ed
Buchanan, Vern
Crenshaw, Ander
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana
Young, Bill
Simpson, Michael Mike
Biggert, Judy
Johnson, Timothy
Kinzinger, Adam
Manzullo, Donald
Schock, Aaron
Shimkus, John
Rogers, Harold Hal
Alexander, Rodney
Benishek, Dan
Camp, David Dave
Miller, Candice
Rogers, Michael Mike
Upton, Frederick Fred
Kline, John
Emerson, Jo Ann
Luetkemeyer
Fortenberry, Jeffrey
Bass, Charles Charlie
Frelinghuysen, Rodney
Lance, Leonard
LoBiondo, Frank
Runyan, Jon
Smith, Christopher Chris
Grimm, Michael
Hayworth, Nan
King, Peter Pete
Reed, II, Tom
Coble, Howard
Boehner, John
LaTourette, Steven
Latta, Robert
Tiberi, Patrick Pat
Cole, Tom
Lucas, Frank
Sullivan, John
Walden, Greg
Barletta, Lou
Dent, Charles
Fitzpatrick, Michael
Gerlach, Jim
Murphy, Tim
Pitts, Joseph
Platts, Todd
Shuster, William Bill
Thompson, Glenn
Brady, Kevin
Sessions, Peter Pete
Smith, Lamar
Thornberry, William Mac
Hastings, Doc
Herrera Beutler, Jaime
McMorris Rodgers, Cathy
Reichert, Dave
Ryan, Paul
Buerkle, Ann Marie
Burton, Dan
Graves, Samuel Sam
Lewis, Jerry
Paul, Ronald Ron
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.