Posted on 09/12/2012 9:21:23 AM PDT by scottjewell
The real story here is that if a company endorses SSM its reputation will suffer. Forbes, for instance, is trying to bury that finding with the headline "Higher Democrat Perception for LGBT brands" when in actuality brand support for companies perceiving to be pro-SSM has dropped among BOTH Republicans and Democrats:
"While overall Buzz scores for the index of brands have decreased among both groups, the decline is more significant among consumers who identify themselves as Republican."
Take a look at this chart for "brands which have publicly supported LGBT" filtered by Democrat and Republican consumers from January 1st to September 5th of this year. The brands measured are "Amazon.com, American Apparel, Apple, General Mills Brands, Google, Home Depot, J.C. Penney, Levi’s, Macy’s, Microsoft, Nabisco, Nike and Starbucks."
No matter how media outlets try to spin it the chart could not be more clear -- coming out for gay marriage hurts a corporation's brand: [See Graphic:]
I saw a J Crew catalog!!!!!! OMG, the colors were so gay, they looked like young girls colors.
when is it on as I’ll do that?.
More like Missile to Missile. Although, that messes up the acronym.
More like Missile to Missile. Although, that messes up the acronym.
Just don’t go to those channels. I’m sure all cable companies can track what is being viewed.
Placemark.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
The "gay" agenda is NOT popular with Americans. And IMHO many Americans are losing their "tolerance", too. It is WRONG to tolerate evil.
When the gay companies out themselves, many of them end up losing business and customers.
__________________________
That Stonewall company that sells jams and jellies is owned by two homosexual men. They fly under the radar. Only those who know that the word stonewall has meaning for homosexuals would know that it is a homosexual company.
Sort of like code.
Personally, I won’t type what I really feel should be done.. I hate queers (hate is different than fear, btw).. and I have my own personal reasons.
What COULD be done... well, it will never happen.. but we could “purchase” an isolated island somewhere where they could bump butts all they want with no worries about moral beings.
IF they never started pushing their ‘feelings’ down our throats and left it as it was after the “lovey feely” 60s’, and kept their own sexual preferences private, I would let them be.
BUT, they want all of us to accept them by them projecting their fudgepacking.. and indoctrinate our kids so that out kids will be their next victims... I don’t care WHERE you send them.. Just get them out of OUR life.
They like free sex with anything that moves.. and drugs?!? send them to Afghanistan where they can chortle on poppy all they want..
Grr.. finished, for now, with my rant .. sick and tired of their crap.
Bikk
I get into these rant moods, too. And yes, if they had simply wanted to be left to their privacy, most would have little problem with that. It’s their “in your face” agenda, spanning decades, which brings out these feelings. And whose fault is that? But we both know.... ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.