[2ndDivisionVet]

"Beyond the pale" doesn't begin to describe it.

[massgopguy]

And it would be barking mad. Unless of course as Ronald Reagan once said, “HE is who he said HE was.”

[Huskrrrr]

Not much said regarding Muslims.

[LibLieSlayer]

ted kennedy will meet this GODless creature when he arrives in hell. “Yeah richard... the Bible was all true”.

LLS

[DonaldC]

That is almost a first, as there can be debate on whether Jesus was God in incarnate, but there usually is not much debate on whether he existed or not.

[TribalPrincess2U]

Sounds racist to me.

[marron]

if given the opportunity to ask the creator (in the unlikely event he’s real) a question, the famed biologist said he’d ask, “Sir, why did you go to such lengths to hide yourself?”

But he doesn't hide himself. It always surprises me when a "scientist" doesn't see him plain as day.

[jessduntno]

““It’s not that I shun them,” he said of the religious. “It’s that the circles I move in tend to be educated, intelligent circles, and there aren’t any religious people among them that I know of.”

Huh. That smart and he doesn’t know how to construct a sentence? Go figure. Unless, of course, he really does move among circles and they are inanimate. There may be such circles, but their existence is something about which I am unaware.

[RichInOC]

...because there’s no evidence of a body?

[Williams]

I stopped taking it seriously when I saw the interviewer listed as “Playboy”.

Really doubt Richard Dawkins is qualified to speak on the evidence of Jesus’s existence from either a scientific or historical standpoint.

[svcw]

Interesting that the man has such fear of God he has become insane, trying to run from the Almighty.

[Dr. Thorne]

Dawkins is a particularly dim self-promoter who has a jones for notoriety earned by insulting God. See ya. Wouldn’t wanna be ya.

[wideawake]

Dawkins is extremely sloppy in his argumentation - he reveals that he has not done his research.

The Israelis and Arabs fighting over Israel aren't referencing "2,000 year old books."

The Torah, even by the most liberal textual critical standard, is 2500 years and the Koran is 1300 years old.

In his letters, Paul explicitly says that if the crucifixion did not happen, then his words are meaningless.

Everything he says about religion demonstrates that he is only vaguely acquainted with the history and texts he is criticizing.

[verga]

Some one once told Mother Angelica that they didn't beleive in hell, she replied, "You will when you get there."

That pretty much sums up my view on Dawkins.

[jagusafr]

Hey, Dick: if I’m wrong, oh well. If you’re wrong...well, I’d rather be in my position than in yours.

Jesus Reigns!

[RichInOC]

“The evidence he existed is surprisingly shaky,” he told Playboy. “The earliest books in the New Testament to be written were the Epistles, not the Gospels. It’s almost as though Saint Paul and others who wrote the Epistles weren’t that interested in whether Jesus was real.”

Doctor, Saint Paul apparently thought He was real enough to change from killing Christians to dying under the sword as one.

[BillyBoy]

Gotta love how this guy blasts creationists in one breathe and in the same breathe he agrees with them that the Catholic Church is an evil cult and the Pope is the enemy. If Dawkins wants to promote evolution so much, why doesn't he spend his time targeting denominations of Christianity that teach young-earth creationism, instead of constantly trashing a religious figure who AGREES with him about evolution?

[Da Coyote]

As if I give a smelly Obama about Dawkin’s ideas.

He’s not exactly in a profession that’s up there with physics or math now, is he?

[<1/1,000,000th%]

The evidence for Richard Dawkins is surprisingly shaky.

[crosshairs]

“Sir, why did you go to such lengths to hide yourself?”

Read the Bible. God reveals himself. Ya lost jackwagon.

[Kartographer]

Major Kira: "That's the thing about faith. If you don't have it you can't understand it, and if you do - no explanation is necessary."
"Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" Accession (1996)