Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

14 U.S. Governors: Prepare State Militia Defenses, to Be Ready Against Obama’s Rogue Federal Forces!
The Blade Report ^ | 3/23/2012 | Editor, The Blade Report

Posted on 03/24/2012 12:14:58 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe

Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few. The Governors of the Great States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia still have under their Command-and-Control the State Defense Forces to go against U.S. Federal forces should the need arise. Also important to note: There are NO U.S. laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State’s Defense Forces. This dilemma occurred during the Civil War with many “citizen soldiers” choosing to serve their states instead of the Federal Government.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished “State Defense Forces.” These forces are described as: “State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state’s National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.”

Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at thebladereport.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2ndamendment; banglist; bhofascism; donttreadonme; fedmob; gangstergovernment; militia; molonlabe; nationalguard; nobama2012; obama; tyranny; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: NewJerseyJoe

bfl


61 posted on 03/24/2012 9:44:00 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

Nothing to see here, Comrades. Move along, move along. /sarc.

This won’t end well.......


62 posted on 03/24/2012 11:03:21 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (Mitt Trotsky and his wingman RuPaul should return to Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

In some neighborhoods, he already has his De facto private amy..


63 posted on 03/25/2012 12:22:25 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy
How would he discipline such a bunch of clowns?

Shoot the ones who get out of line, immediately, in front of the rest.

The rest would follow orders.

64 posted on 03/25/2012 2:54:33 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
I refuse to romanticize about civil war and SHTF scenarios and the kumbuhya survival yearnings some dream about.

Ditto. Anyone who thinks that road wouldn't be brutally nasty, personally painful (if not fatal), and rocky beyond belief, needs to get their head examined.

We'll all do what we have to, if we have to, but bringing it on is just insane if there is a better way to achieve the desired results.

65 posted on 03/25/2012 3:00:12 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Ditto. Anyone who thinks that road wouldn't be brutally nasty, personally painful (if not fatal), and rocky beyond belief, needs to get their head examined.

Another CW will probably cost me my life. So be it, I'd rather die fighting back than this wimpy "political" war that we are losing. Bring it. If you don't think our ancestors, if in the same position we find ourselves in now, wouldn't have revolted/seceded already you very ignorant.

Secession does not cause war. the reaction to by the Federals is what causes a war in that scenario. They won't fight. They would love to ditch the south and fly-over plains mountain states. To them it would be good riddance. It would free them to build there Socialist Utopia™.

66 posted on 03/25/2012 6:16:55 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Forget loot and burn. Rape has to come first.

Well, certainly before burn.

67 posted on 03/25/2012 8:30:07 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Another CW will probably cost me my life. So be it, I'd rather die fighting back than this wimpy "political" war that we are losing. Bring it. If you don't think our ancestors, if in the same position we find ourselves in now, wouldn't have revolted/seceded already you very ignorant.

I'm not shrinking from necessity--and our ancestors tried every form of relief prior to secession, first from the English (over a three percent tax rate), then from the Union. One worked out pretty well for a little while, the other, not so well, and I had relatives in both.

If it happens, it happens, and Yep, it'll probably be the end of me, too.

But I have noticed there are a number of people who seem to be looking forward to they know not what.

War isn't glory, it is brutal, and the civillians always suffer the most.

Secession does not cause war. the reaction to by the Federals is what causes a war in that scenario. They won't fight. They would love to ditch the south and fly-over plains mountain states. To them it would be good riddance. It would free them to build there Socialist Utopia™.

While the coasts might say "good riddance", that would only last until they realized the grain produced here, the oil, coal, electricity, natural gas, iron ore, steel, and other products (especially agricultural and energy minerals) were now 'trade items', IF we decied to trade with them.

Then the rats would decide they 'deserved' those resources, and the S would HTF.

The only means to stop that would be extreme, by any standard, and would, of necessity, make 'shock and awe' look like a church picnic. Nothing Less would suffice.

If we can regain the Republic by peaceful means, let's do so. It would be preferable to the slaughter that is the alternative.

68 posted on 03/25/2012 9:56:53 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson