Posted on 03/20/2012 10:04:13 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Individuals and member organizations of the American media were threatened with FTC and FCC investigation if information gathered by Sheriff Arpaios Cold Case Posse concerning the forgery of Barack Obamas long form birth certificate were passed on to the American public.
It was Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo who made this stunning revelation, stating During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs. (1)
And Jerome Corsi, author of Wheres the birth certificate, the book whose imminent publication was responsible for forcing Barack Obama to quickly create and place the fraudulent long form birth certificate on the White House web site, has said that Testimony is being developed that the White House is intimidating, in a systematic way, the mainstream media and if any broadcasters dare go into this birther story, theyre going to risk FCC investigations people are going to have careers ruined thrown off the air. (2)
Zullo went on to say the threats actually caused some individuals to quit their positions over safety concerns for their families. (1)
Those who tuned in to the web-cast of the Cold Case Posse report will recall that the scant few media members in attendance made it their business to represent the President rather than report on the information presented about the fraudulent birth certificate.
Each reporter in his turn...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
It’s going to take evidence so profound, so blatant and so obvious that it wakes, no infuriates the public to a point where their voices become so unbearably shrill, it literally drives their representatives to action.
I offered all the information I have to the head of the Poynter Institute, asking if he would find even one reporter who would be willing to even listen to what I’ve got, with full permission to use it to break the story of the century. He said the media had already covered the issue beyond saturation point, nobody was interested, and no media company would pay the money needed to verify my free information.
You are way, way, way too naive about the press. They are not what you think they are. They are Baghdad Bob.
And if you don’t believe me on this, then maybe you can tell me why only one reporter has done any real investigation of Fast And Furious, even after Congressional hearings involving ignored subpoenas and perjury, where hundreds of innocent deaths are involved as well as acts of war against Mexico. There’s a Pulitzer just waiting to be grabbed by anybody who will take it. Why no takers, Hot Tabasco?
Name me one story that anybody in the media has sacrificed their career over in the past 5 years.
Andrew Breitbart died 4-5 hours after affirming what Sheriff Joe had told him about probable cause for forgery and fraud involving Obama’s BC and draft registration.... on the same day that Rush Limbaugh received a bomb threat.... on the same day that Sheriff Joe held a presser to reveal his findings, and the media refused to report the actual evidence that was presented.
“Years later he became convinced this was 0bama.”
“He signed an affadavit that he was “100% certain that the young man he met in front of Tom and Mary Ayers home was Barack 0bama.” He also repeated that on video and seems very clear and rational.”
Well shucks! Given the neighborhood, I believe him. There are idiots also claiming that my friend/neighbor Todd was Bush’s fault.
He probably was.
Dots to be connected......
That's the inevitable conclusion that I've found myself coming to repeatedly as well. There are sufficient numbers of Marxist ideologue fellow travelers, crass opportunists and selfishly craven individuals out there to account for a majority, a large one even, of folks being hyper-averse to the topic of Zero's eligibility, particularly among those in the media.
But it is to my mind statistically (no, I'm not a statistician) impossible for there to be pretty much a mathematical zero number of people in positions of sufficient influence, both in and out of government, to force this issue actually taking a stand and talking about it. Loudly.
Like you, I consider many of these people patriots and generally fearless, to boot. I'd also like to think that they'd even be so in the face of personal or familial danger. But what if they were told, by people sufficiently placed to convince them utterly that should "Obama" be irrefutably outed, the consequences would be the complete ruination of the country? A run on the banking system, civil unrest, financial collapse, and so on.
Whatever "it" is that is motivating this mass charade on the part of people who normally would be considered stalwarts in defending the constitution must be stupefying in its import. You think the NSA doesn't know everything about "Obama" down to the color of his panties? Sheesh.
Deep, deep doo-doo.
Please take me off your list.
very excellent posts butteredzillion. they answer many puzzling questions, although three are outstanding IMO:
1. you said most major media people are in bed in soros, obama, etc. why aren’t we seeing any power struggles among this group? i mean, why would these media moguls, even if of like mind, bend to soros when they may themselves want to be in control? why isn’t anyone turning on soros?
2. what is the chance that congress would appoint a special prosecutor when most people in congress also don’t want to touch the subbject?
3. besides a special investigator, where does arpaio’s investigation go now?
You bet this is believable.
Add to that, chairman O told the media to scrub the stories of his daughter vacationing in Mexico (On our dollar).
Looks like baraq is starting to shove the media around.
Rough them up in preparation for the election. Or just remind them who’se da boss.
Hey media, just what do you think baraq will do to all of you if he wins a second term?
Good questions. I think #1 is addressed in post #59 (which you probably saw right after you posted, in the FR version of phone tag. lol)
#2 depends on what has been silencing Congress on this issue. Both R’s and D’s, because at this point if we’re going to save the country it’s gonna take at least some of the D’s to step up to the plate.
If it’s fear of race riots, maybe we need to let them know that two can play at that game too. We are awake and will not consign our children to live in lawlessness. And we would need Black leaders to rise up and rally Blacks to say that Blacks are better than that. Herman Cain, Allen West, and Bill Cosby come to mind. But that would require for them to realize how close to the edge this nation and world really are.
If they are aware of threats of another run on the bank, then we need to press them on a real solution to get the country backed away from the financial-collapse precipice - such as Paul Ryan’s budget plan. To do that we would need D Senators to recognize that this is a national security issue to prevent the collapse of the United States as a whole. At the same time D & R lawmakers need to see if there is a way they can sneak past Obama (or pass with a veto-proof majority) measures to protect the country from economic terrorism.
I was recently made aware that the producer of a documentary about Obama’s thuggery in the 2008 primary has said on radio that D sources told her that Soros asked both Hillary and Obama if they would be willing to destroy the US economy; Hillary said no and Obama said yes. I’m still sorting out the information from that source, which is at http://www.politijim.com/2012/03/did-obama-assassinate-clinton-delegates.html
If the claims made by this gal are true, then I’d say I’m probably 90% sure that my theory is correct in at least its main point. What I came to on my own from observing the outward signs seems to closely resemble what this gal says she saw from the inside.
Oops. Have to get my daughter to school. I’ll address #3 later.
Done!
Butter,
I know these are pointless questions since Obama and his minions are in power right now but Bush should have done something much different.
Why is the entire government held hostage to Soros? Is he not an enemy of this country? Economic terrorism? Why don’t they just put him Gitmo?
He’s a naturalized citizen, certainly they would have the capacity to revoke his citizenship and treat him as harshly as it would seem to be warranted if he was holding this country hostage.
This guy is like a living, breathing Dr. Evil without all the humor.
; )
OK, but if you ever want back on the list, you still have to threaten to sic The Mod Squad on me.
We have our rulz and traditions...
Dude
They should put him in Gitmo. But that wouldn’t solve this problem. If it wasn’t Soros who was holding the country hostage it would be his son, or one of the other communists or Islamists in the alliance. That’s the danger in there being this communist-Islamist alliance. Taking out any one person will not get rid of the alliance.
The problem isn’t that there are crooks who want to destroy the country but that the country itself has put itself in danger by failing to seriously consider the end result of the “sweet nothings” the enemy has fed us over a long, long time. The communists have been using the Cloward-Piven Plan for the last 45 years, to try to bring the country to a point where our economy is fragile enough to allow something like this. That’s 45 years the American public has been sleeping while the communists slowly boiled the frog, one degree at a time.
It’s actually very much like what the German person said when they said America can survive a Barack Obama; what they can’t survive is a POPULACE WHO WOULD ELECT SOMEBODY LIKE OBAMA.
What’s really threatening us is our own lack of discipline which now has us teetering on the edge of an economic precipice. Reagan brought us back from the edge when he was in office, but we’ve not done well since Reagan.
Soros has preyed on one country after another, but he knows enough to only go after the vulnerable ones. Like the Muslims, Soros knows not to go after those who are strong. He watches for a country/currency to stumble into a vulnerable position and then he sucker-punches them with everything he’s got. America was ripe for the punch; Americans just thought they were invincible so they ddn’t learn the lessons from history or from other countries. We’ve behaved like spoiled little brats using daddy’s credit card rather than thinking soberly and soundly, and now the payment is due.
Arpaio’s investigation will work on finding the people who defrauded Arizona voters. I believe they are able to subpoena records and force depositions since it’s now a criminal investigation. I’m not sure whether federal agencies can refuse a subpoena from a county sheriff or not. If individuals can be deposed there could be enough evidence for criminal charges even without the government records. I’m not a lawyer so I don’t know for sure, but I would think if there were criminal charges there would be discovery allowed.
As Arpaio alluded to in a WND article today, the posse has a lot more stuff than they put in the press conference. I have a feeling there will be no shortage of people they could eventually charge with crimes, and each person they charge opens up another range of discovery that could be available.
Unless there’s something major I’m missing, from here on out the dominoes could fall one after the other. And if I’m not mistaken, criminal trials involve a JURY, not a single easily-manipulated judge who can ignore the rule of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.