Posted on 03/18/2012 3:48:33 AM PDT by VaConstitution
What, what, where, when, why, how...?
In total agreement with your assessment.
From the Daily Paul it is short message but describes it well.
http://www.dailypaul.com/221319/national-defense-resources-preparedness-march-16th-executive-order
Also see this link for other EO’s within the past 6 weeks
http://www.dailypaul.com/221319/national-defense-resources-preparedness-march-16th-executive-order#comment-2322438
Great bumper sticker material!
I agree. This is one of the worst articles I ever read. Its so bad, I got a headache halfway through.
I sent a local conservative talkshow host the link and completed both an email and private message. Normally I hear back, I’ve heard nothing. I can only hope they are doing research, reading here and maybe realizing what we all are realizing...
The local guy is usually on Sunday mornings and throughout the week here. He has NO topics posted this morning for discussion. Weird. Normally he feeds us a topic list.
What is this “Act 50” that he keeps referring to? Was this a bill that passed earlier? I can’t even google it, it doesn’t give me anything, which I didn’t expect.
Also a possible accumulation of prior EO's, Congressional legislation done piecemeal and now put all together(ala David Axelrod?) by a true emperor type to assume the final power over all over all of us and our every move,food gas,economy ,everything. During time of emergency of course.
Which in obamaville can be anything for a beer summit to a severe need for KFC chicken. Doesn't take much for an emergency in the regime.
Great, and they can use the secret prisons that Bush was building back during his reign.
What is this Act 50 that he keeps referring to?
At first I thought it to be reference to USC Title 50, but that isn’t the case. Title 10 and 50 establish HOW the national defense apparatus is built upon. Title 10 is the “manning, training, and equipping” of our armed forces by the service chiefs, and Title 50 is everything else needed for warfighting. They are most definately constitutional because they depend upon the Congress for authorization and appropriations.
This EO is straight up Communism with no Congressional oversight.
Thanks very much for the post; links. BTTT!
Right under the headline on Drudge.
They might be employed, but without pay.
I guess Alex Jones it correct but I am told I can’t say that here. So kill me.
Dont give Obama that much credit ! He is no more a major player in God’s will than you or I.
Hmmmm. Looks like he is deferring blame for these atrocities beforehand.
Not unless its really about kicking off R2!
...this should have been the headline. Fracas at ‘Occupy NY’? Yawn.
I’d like one Freeper to tell me where Alex Jones has been wrong. You may not like his style or his delivery and it may be trendy to call him a nut but he’s been spot on.
“They might be employed, but without pay.”
That’s an option for later. Right now, to improve his numbers, Obama would have them all in paid positions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.