What is this “Act 50” that he keeps referring to? Was this a bill that passed earlier? I can’t even google it, it doesn’t give me anything, which I didn’t expect.
What is this “Act 50” that he keeps referring to?
At first I thought it to be reference to USC Title 50, but that isn’t the case. Title 10 and 50 establish HOW the national defense apparatus is built upon. Title 10 is the “manning, training, and equipping” of our armed forces by the service chiefs, and Title 50 is everything else needed for warfighting. They are most definately constitutional because they depend upon the Congress for authorization and appropriations.
This EO is straight up Communism with no Congressional oversight.