Oops, almost missed this article.
Check it out.
.
Posted on 03/01/2012 10:58:04 PM PST by Windflier
NEW YORK, NY – An intensive examination of the contents of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.
In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administration’s Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obama’s document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.
Most importantly, the actual data found in the document image reveals that Obama’s natal history is in direct, and even absurd, conflict with historical precedents defining citizenry, demographics and birth metrics as well as protocols governing vital statistics accounting while exposing epic deceptions on a scale never before seen in American political history.
Aside from the contextual contradictions revealed by Obama's alleged 1961 birth records, it can never be dismissed that, according to centuries of legal and doctrinal precedence, the fact that Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth forever disqualifies him from ever being eligible to hold the office of president unless the Constitution were to have been legally changed prior to his presidency.
A natural-born citizen is one born of geographic and biological circumstances, and to have remained under those citizenship metrics from birth to election, which make it impossible for any authority or public perception to consider him or her allied with any status other than naturally-born as a citizen of that nation.
Being born in a geographic location which is under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to two citizen parents are two of the three major components of natural-born citizenship according to historical authority defining the term. The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.
These metrics were not made to hurt the feelings of those not qualified. They were intended to protect the sovereignty of the United States of America and its Constitutional rights through ensuring, to the highest possible degree, the allegiances of its executive powers. For, only the executive branch is led by one.
Failure to understand this is tantamount to willful ignorance and inferior understanding of the reason why America remains the greatest santuary of freedom and protection in world history.
A most excellent retort, my good Freeper!
People who view the condition of Natural Born Citizen in such a way, don't understand its meaning or history. That fact is made abundantly clear by the author of the piece in his opening statements.
Fact: The Framers attempted to restrict the highest office in the land to only those whose tie to The United States was as undiluted and unalloyed as possible (for obvious reasons).
The best way to ensure that the holder of the presidency was of the purest allegiance, was to restrict the holding of that office to only those who were born on US soil, to two US citizen parents.
That is the total simplicity of the Natural Born Citizen clause. There is no other complexity to it.
Thanks for posting the link to Part 1 of the three part series. If you haven’t already, can you post it as a stand alone thread? I think it would be helpful.
Thanks again.
Without a doubt. And, this is just one of a three part series. Whoa Nellie!
PING-A-LING-A-LING!!! THANKS.
“I always wondered what those penciled codes meant.”
You will not know what those penciled codes mean by going to the article discussed here because it is a fraud. The supposed images from the 1961 Vital Statistics Instruction manual are actually taken from the 1969 tape layouts (verified by matching imperfections in the image). The actual 1961 code “9” for race (and race is a central part of the argument) is “other non-white” not “not stated” as the article claims. That bit of fraud invalidates a major claim in the article.
Any time an article claims that experts contributed to it, and then no experts are listed, one might reasonably suspect that they are being intentionally misled.
If you really do want to know what the penciled codes mean, read my article:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-2/
Oops, almost missed this article.
Check it out.
.
Excellent!!!!
How did we miss this?
This is precisely why there is little faith or trust in the court system, journalism or the people elected to represent American citizens. The fact is this president has never qualified for the presidency, should be impeached and everything he's enacted should be nullified. Those on talk radio and TV anchors with huge audiences refused to address the matter, yet condemned everything else along the way that Obama did that ripped the Constitution to shreds. Meanwhile a majority of Americans had serious concerns all along that this man should never have been a candidate for the highest position in this land.
Respect for the US Constitution should have taken precedent to EVERYTHING else that spewed out of their mouths about Obama. The fact this man was not Constitutionally qualified to be a US President in the first place is a gigantic face-palm to US history and everyone who played a part in ignoring it and refusing to address the matter in any legitimate way has no respect whatsoever for American sovereignty, no matter how they attempt to spin their deleliction of duty to America and Americans. Joking about it does not constitute educating or informing their audiences.
Dunno, no one ever tells me anything.
So the top adviser to Obama is a natural born citizen of Iran?
That would be concerning.
Blue, I jokingly named his Chicago friends BO’s UN. They pretty well covered the world: India, Syria, Pakistan, etc etc. Many were involved in Real Estate and Banking. Suspect money laudering and possible drugs.
Connect the dots: BO, Michelle Robinson Obama, Jesse Robinson Jackson, Noah Robinson (his half bro not his dad); El-Rukn, Area of Chicago BO worked in as CO.
If you’ve got a few hours to read, I’ll send you a link to the Chicago Crime thread.
Ping to the rest of you.
I was referring to Ms. Valerie Jarrett.
If the argument - born in country makes you a ‘natural born citizen’ of that country. Then she is a natural born Iranian.
I wonder if BO’s UN all enjoy family pet meat? Outside the US and Europe it is a common food source...
I was referring to Ms. Valerie Jarrett.
If the argument - born in country makes you a ‘natural born citizen’ of that country. Then she is a natural born Iranian.
I wonder if BO’s UN all enjoy family pet meat? Outside the US and Europe it is a common food source...
I know. She was into real estate, getting government grants to improve housing projects, pocketing the money and letting many live in squalor.
Lots on her scattered through out:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2151323/posts?q=1&;page=1
.......snicker........
I couldn't agree more, Mama. Nearly every American that we have placed in any capacity of trust, has failed us (and their country) on this point.
Sadly, many of them will come out of the closet and claim that they "knew it all along", when it's finally safe to do so. Cowards, one and all.
But Jarrett’s parents weren’t Iranians. So she’s a NBC of no country... (even earth??)
Yeah...
But this was a response to the post earlier.
“Supposedly, even if you were born in the US to parents who were both aliens, you would still be “natural born.””
So, if that is the logic - to say only jus soli designates natural born status - regardless of parentage. Then it only makes sense that Ms. Jarrett is named a natural born citizen of Iran using the very same logic.
Obama born in Hawaii is natural born, then Jarrett born in Iran is natural born - Natural born Iranian Citizen.
Thus, the top adviser would be an Iranian citizen - a natural born Iranian citizen. Lets see that get defended.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.