Skip to comments.Vital Records Indicate Obama Not Born In Hawaii Hospital (Part 2)
Posted on 03/01/2012 10:58:04 PM PST by Windflier
NEW YORK, NY An intensive examination of the contents of Obamas alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.
In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administrations Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obamas document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.
Most importantly, the actual data found in the document image reveals that Obamas natal history is in direct, and even absurd, conflict with historical precedents defining citizenry, demographics and birth metrics as well as protocols governing vital statistics accounting while exposing epic deceptions on a scale never before seen in American political history.
Aside from the contextual contradictions revealed by Obama's alleged 1961 birth records, it can never be dismissed that, according to centuries of legal and doctrinal precedence, the fact that Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth forever disqualifies him from ever being eligible to hold the office of president unless the Constitution were to have been legally changed prior to his presidency.
A natural-born citizen is one born of geographic and biological circumstances, and to have remained under those citizenship metrics from birth to election, which make it impossible for any authority or public perception to consider him or her allied with any status other than naturally-born as a citizen of that nation.
Being born in a geographic location which is under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to two citizen parents are two of the three major components of natural-born citizenship according to historical authority defining the term. The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.
These metrics were not made to hurt the feelings of those not qualified. They were intended to protect the sovereignty of the United States of America and its Constitutional rights through ensuring, to the highest possible degree, the allegiances of its executive powers. For, only the executive branch is led by one.
Failure to understand this is tantamount to willful ignorance and inferior understanding of the reason why America remains the greatest santuary of freedom and protection in world history.
"Most certainly, vital records and statistics were never intended to be used as evidence for determining the eligibility of individuals to hold public office. The information contained in them does not provide an accurate portrayal of the specific natal circumstances, biographical events and geographic indicators required for determining Natural-born citizenry. Vital records simply are not qualified for making such determinations, but in the absence of other vetting resources and effort by authorities, they serve as a starting point for investigation.
Since some have chosen to elicit validation from the absurdity of internet images of alleged 50-year-old birth records, without so much as questioning their authenticity or origins, to determine a previously obscure politicians eligibility to hold the most powerful and dangerous position in the world, they get what they deserve in their failure to demand a higher vetting standard.
Not only has the American public descended to new depths of endemic irrationality over Obamas alleged birth records, the complex world of vital records and statistics has been breached to reveal some of the most bizarre protocols and complex logistics of any municipal service.
Tragically, so many remain willing to accept an ambiguous, uncorroborated image of an alleged document posted to the most corruptible and unreliable source of mythology in history, the internet, as the holy grail of some politicians legitimacy to hold the greatest executive and military power on earth."
The above is just a small excerpt from the much larger article, which goes into great detail about the evidence for fraud with Obama’s LFBC.
I haven’t even fully digested it all yet, but the author’s opening statements are some of the most cogent, and eloquent that I’ve yet read on this subject.
Yeah.... What you said.
Go to the original article....ping
Wow! This is an impressive read! I always wondered what those penciled codes meant...This definitely has new info. that should be considered. Thanks for posting!
Pinging to Nachum
Good article made difficult by the authors constant injection of opinion and hyperbole. It could have been a good 25% or more shorter and easier to get through.
ping for later
read it once, will read it a second time...finally someone has it all on one page, thanks for the ping!
Thanks to you, I posted the article on ATS here:
Given the liberal bent of most posters and mods there . . . if anyone wants to increase the likelihood that some of the more fair-minded folks there would see the truth—they are welcome to post on the thread.
AT this late hour in the disintegration of our Republic . . . I figure we need all the publicity of the truth . . . that we can spread far and wide.
“The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.”
A nice thought, but is there a shred of Constitutional corroboration of this claim?
great stuff! :-)
It's right there in Article II, Section One:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President".
This includes present status, thus if born a natural born citizen but changed status before running for President, one is not eligible to serve.
The conclusion by former Social Security Administration record investigators is very damning.
"...Obamas certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obamas record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obamas birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president."
There are various definitions of the term “natural-born citizen.” It’s not defined in the Constitution. Supposedly, even if you were born in the US to parents who were both aliens, you would still be “natural born.”
This is the best analysis of O’s birth certificate that I’ve ever seen. This and Sheriff Arpaio’s bombshell yesterday should trigger a Congressional investigation into possible forged identity documents.
Thanks for posting.
If that’s all you’re getting it from, then you’re in trouble. We don’t allow parental moves such as adoption to negate regular citizenship status, and I certainly don’t see the precedent that has been established on that re NBC status.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.