Posted on 02/06/2012 10:22:13 AM PST by 92nina
While many Americans celebrated Groundhog Day [last Thurs]day, lawmakers in Washington were participating in a more regular tradition: debating the state of the economy. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke took the stand before the House Budget Committee to defend the central banks recent policy decisions, a performance that mirrored the pomp and circumstance of the activities in Punxsutawney.
Bernankes repetition of poor policy prescriptions was a fitting way to celebrate the national holiday. Once again, he insisted that interest rates will remain low without affecting inflation, and that government spending will increase job growth. In fact, Bernanke warned lawmakers ahead of the August debt deal that cutting spending too quickly would be catastrophic for the economy. In reality, the succeeding five months have been the only consistent decrease in the unemployment rate since the start of the Obama Administration. And yet, both the President and the Chairman ignore actual pro-growth policy. There are several common sense solutions that have yet to be implemented, despite the abysmal economic performance of the past three years.
While Americas favorite groundhog may have predicted six more weeks of winter, the nations (least?) favorite policymaker admitted the country would likely face many more years of poor job growth. The recent CBO report confirms this: unemployment is expected to stay above 8 percent (the number we were promised it would never crest with the passage of the stimulus) until 2017. The Obama Administration has many pro-growth policies at its fingertips. What will it take to get the President to act?
Read more: http://www.atr.org/bernanke-see-his-shadow-a6717#ixzz1lcsjRLlO
Take this article and others I found to the fight to the Libs on their own turf; put the Left on the defensive at Digg and at Reddit and in Stumbleupon and Delicious
And the 8 percent number is highly misleading or bogus. As we have learned, all you need to do is reduce the total workforce while maintaining the absolute employment number in order to reduce the unemployment rate.
Even more, that rate doesn’t count wage-earning workers with hours forcibly reduced, and full-time salaried employees who now take part-time jobs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.