Posted on 01/25/2012 5:57:22 PM PST by Mr. K
Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of StateAdministrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client andadvising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. WhileI regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to anadministrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As thereferring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearingsscheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, Ido not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judgeto report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of thereport, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to myreview of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in theOSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to thismatter.Sincerely,Brian P. Kemp
Remember when Stallone said the line that was almost laughable? “I am the law.” Some sci fi flick.
Well, here we are.
So what were you saying?
Excellent! The Judge should send a request to Law Enforcement in Nevada to apprehend the subpoena evader (Obama) and bring him to court! This is within the judges power!
Judge Dredd.
“Judge Dredd”, maybe? Never saw it, but you’re right.
Sadly (speaking as an atty) this is utterly meaningless as it’s an ALJ (from what I gather). Even if this were a State Trial Court it means nothing. If anything is to come of this, it would need to be through Fed Dist Ct.
Went back and looked at 2008 election results...They had McCain/Obama at 52 to 47.....and Obama wound up winning?? Something sure seems wrong there. I'll go back and see how early that separation was..
Watch Obama throw his lawyer under the bus.
Let a few more states follow and we'll have Hillary running. I don't know if enough libs can remember why they hated her last time. Hussein and his handlers know his time is quickly running out and are probably surprised he's held on as long as he has. If this does gain speed, he'll step down claiming it's damaging his health or family life or some other hooey.
Oops..My previous post is wrong....McCain won Georgia.
Here is the way I see it, when the One was first elected he was fairly untouchable, Judges said “no Standing” because they new damn well there would be massive riots had he been removed for the fraud he has put on us! Now that just about everyone is tired of Obama judges are more likely to move on the Constitution versus being blamed for huge riots. I think Orly is pretty close to Checkmate, the king may be going down, we can hope and change, can’t we?
See post #14.
The Constitution means what it says.
The legislature of Georgia has spoken, as cited by the ALJ and the Secretary of State of Georgia.
More likely that Jablonski has decided he isn’t going to risk getting disbarred or going to prison by filing documents he knows to be fradulent.
The icing on the cake would be if he was exported back to Kenya!
I hope obummer has trouble sleeping tonight.
I’m of the opinion that this is not going to effictively go anywhere in Georgia. Obummers lawyers will just take this to the federal judiciary where their batting average is greatly improved. Should they receive an adverse ruling on the ballot issue at the state level they will just ask for and likely get a stay on any state court ruling pending a hearing in federal court. This is only the beginning and will (likely) drag out beyond the election while the order of stay is in effect and Obummer stays on the ballot.
Dear Mr. Jablonski:
I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (”OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.
As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.
In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.
I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
I believe it is, there is another thread about it too. Others here will say if it’s not correct.
The Hubris Chickens...
...Have come home to roost!
“If Obama’s lawyer chooses not to attend the next hearing then go for summary judgment FTW and disallow Obama’s name to be placed on the ballot.”
Undoubtedly provoking race riots around election time in ATL that they so long for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.