Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: My hearts in London - Everett

I respect your faith. But how do you know you have the truth vs. those that feel they have the truth via their beliefs in Catholicism, other Protestant beliefs, etc.? In the example I gave, what archeological and scientific proof is there of the Trinity? There’s ample evidence in the bible against the Trinity. Many of the early Christian fathers didn’t teach it, & in fact in many cases taught against it.

There were approx. 250 bishops present at Nicea when the Nicene creed was voted on. There were approx. 500 bishops present at Rimini/Seleucia just 25 years later when they repudiated the theory. So, how do you know which is right given the lack of archeological and scientific proof, or irrefutable evidence in the bible, but rather simply the traditions of our fathers? So, it really does become a guess for most. Maybe an educated guess, but a guess none the less.

That’s what I’m talking about. Why lambaste other’s beliefs when there is a lack of irrefutable evidence for you own? Another example, the Catholics believe in works as part of salvation. Protestants for the better part do not. This is big! For if the Catholics are right, some Protestants are screwed due to a lack of works in some cases. If the Protestants are right, that all one needs is faith, then the Catholics are still in good shape because they already believe.

There are good arguments for either theory. Does anyone really know for sure, absolutely 100%? I’m just saying that until you are 100% sure, it may be well w/ you to not demean others who may very well be right. It would seem to be sound reasoning. It would be even better for one to not spend a seeming lifetime of day after day bashing of others as some here seemingly do. But that’s just my 2 cents


240 posted on 10/29/2011 1:01:37 PM PDT by Confab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: Confab

Why do you label it “demeaning” to simply say you disagree which is what I’ve done in the majority of my posts here? I strenuously disagree with your contention that there is a lack of irrefutable evidence for my faith. There is plenty of evidence. Also, most Christian denominations (excepting Mormons) agree on the basics of the faith. I don’t know what bible you’re referencing, but mine teaches the trinity.


241 posted on 10/29/2011 1:26:12 PM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (Still searching for the new tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

To: Confab; My hearts in London - Everett
archeological and scientific proof is there of the Trinity

Are you arguing as an atheist confab?

There’s ample evidence in the bible against the Trinity

there is even more so FOR the Trinity, and those 'against' are likely to have been taken out of context.

Many of the early Christian fathers didn’t teach it, & in fact in many cases taught against it.

In fact your facts are not correct. It was taught by name at least 100+ years before nicea and is present in ANF writings through to the bible itself. I would challenge those 'early fathers' as to the validity of their claim of being Christian.

Nicea

Your education regarding the need for Nicea is evidently lacking. What teaching was this upstart Arianism challenging at the time confab?????? My, my, Trinitarianism, hmmmmmmm then it didn't originate at Nicea but Nicea served to confirm what the historic and accepted teaching was.

So, how do you know which is right given the lack of archeological and scientific proof, or irrefutable evidence in the bible, but rather simply the traditions of our fathers?

Yet you cite a form of 'archaeological' evidences - the WRITINGS of the people of the period. Hmmmmmm?

SUPERnatural is not subordinate nor can it be evaluated by the natural, which is the realm that science is bound to operate in. And you haven't refuted anything from the bible yet.

242 posted on 10/29/2011 1:32:26 PM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

To: Confab

Why lambaste other’s beliefs when there is a lack of irrefutable evidence for you own?

There were approx. 250 bishops present at Nicea when the Nicene creed was voted on.
_______________________________________

and absolutely NOBODY there when Joey Smith claimed to have had his “vision”

or saw his mormon gods or his mormon angels or his mormon anythings..

or “found” his golden plates or folden armor or golden sword

No witnesses at all...

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

“there is a lack of irrefutable evidence for you own beliefs...”


244 posted on 10/29/2011 2:34:04 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (If we give Sandy a ladder will she preach from the temple roof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

To: Confab
Does anyone really know for sure, absolutely 100%?


Thank you for calling "Ask the Prophet!"

 

Every call is important to us.

All lines are presently in use.

If you wish to access the Ask the Prophet FAQ sheet, Press 1 to be connected to LDS.ORG

If you wish to access the Ask the Prophet FAQ sheet en Espanol, Pulse 2 para ser conectado a LDS.ORG

If you wish to talk to the Living Prophet, please standby and a representitive will be with you shortly.

After receiving an answer from the Living Prophet, Press 3 to hear a unanimous affirmation of TRUTH by 12 sub-representitives.

(Cue background music: Praise to the Man)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for calling "Ask the Prophet!"

Every call is important to us.

All lines are presently in use.

.

.

.

.

261 posted on 10/29/2011 7:09:06 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson