Posted on 10/20/2011 12:00:20 PM PDT by Danae
New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.
Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state “Full Text of Case”, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.
+++SNIP+++
Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor’s relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the “Full Text of Case”.
+++SNIP+++
... Justia’s reaction to my last report mirrored the deception of the sabotage. Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all. And they placed “.txt robots” on their URL’s for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia.
TWO LAYERS OF SABOTAGE
In all 25 instances of tampering, the case name “Minor v. Happersett” was removed from Justia’s publication of each SCOTUS opinion which cited to it. Anyone searching for cases citing Minor at Justia or Google were led into a maze of confusion. In some instances, not only was the case name scrubbed, the numerical citation was also removed along with whole sentences of text.
I thought this statement by the 1874 Minor court was refreshing: If the law is wrong, it ought to be changed; but the power for that is not with us.
Such a view acknowledges the standard before one even gets to judicial restraint!
bttt
Well, then call 911.
you dont call 911 to report a non-emergency.
you are being a real jerk if you have a comment on the content make it otherwise please STFU
seems the coverup has stuck one of your nerves
My team did it. We were paid $500/scrub.
You’re welcome.
would you please make a sworn affidavit to that fact. I’ll be glad to take it to the authorities.
Whats the matter your baloney NBC theory shot our of the water and you want to go down with the ship?
I did make amcomment regarding the content.
A poster mentioned Leo Donofrio and I having not thought of Leo in quite some time asked if Leo was still having problems with all those black helicopters flying over his house.
What authorities are you going to take it to? Do you REALLY believe any glitches involved in Justia constitute a crime? Are you really that full of crap?
Second. Minor - not any part of it - attempts to give a full definition of NBC. That is why WKA ended up discussing it at great length, and why it was a part of the arguments in WKA.
Of course, you don’t believe that. All 50 states, every member of Congress, and every court agrees with my interpretation, but your circle jerk of idiot birthers continue to believe insanity. All 12 of you...
Their defense will be "Mens Rea".
It was cemented into law in article II where it uses two different terms, thereby implying they cannot mean the same thing.
"No Person except a natural born citizen, OR a CITIZEN of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Yep, and it was solidified by Monor, which in turn has been solidified dozens and dozens of times in SCOTUS cases which cite to it because it is the LAW.
Obama is an Illegal POTUS.
EVERYTHING he does in the office is ILLEGAL. It’s abhorrent he is still in the People’s house.
sfl
And you are submerged in it pissing up.
Default stupidity does not constitute agreement with you...though it should. You demonstrate the incompetence of a government bureaucrat without even being one! (as far as we know. On the other hand, it would explain your behavior.)
EVERYTHING he does in the office is ILLEGAL. It’s abhorrent he is still in the People’s house.
I agree.
Bump
This is BIG!
I’m surprised you weren’t pinged by someone else given your work on the Slaughterhouse cases on the 14th A.
Can you put this in breaking? Case law was tampered with prior to the’08 election. This is very serious as precedent was changed due to the sabotage which removed pertinent case info.
gnip
wondering if this warrants the ping list, the case law database was sabotaged and txt.robot were placed in files to prevent certain info from being accessed
I have a question. Would lawyers use this site to prepare for cases? Would the SCOTUS refer to this site when researching to write opinions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.