Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Palin Victory Doesn't Depend on a Date
Conservatives4Palin ^

Posted on 10/02/2011 1:17:04 PM PDT by Amerisrael

A Palin victory will depend on the decisions the voters will make based upon her record in Alaska and the solutions she presents to the problems currently plaguing this country.

Once a primary is running full force, most voters don’t remember or give the slightest hoot as to which candidate had jumped in a full year ahead of the game and which candidate is only in the race a half a year or three quarters of a year. Votes based on such calculations are petty, foolish, and therefore probably non-existent. When questioned at exit polls, voters usually point to a particular position on policy which they feel strongly about, or an approach to a current problem and which they feel their candidate has got it right.

Yes, in 2008 many voted for Obama mainly to assuage their conscience, feel righteous, and join those creating history. But by and large, especially in difficult times, voters vote for a candidate because of their confidence in him or her to lead the country and to deal with the issues.

Additionally, Obama’s grandiose though empty promises were also the deciding factor for many of those who voted for him and were swept up, up, up and away in his euphoric rhetoric only to have since landed back to reality with a painful thud. In 2012, promises will therefore not be enough. Candidates are and will continue to be requested to provide proof to their claims and promises via their records and undergo careful scrutiny and questioning about specifics in their past.

Those that have repeatedly attempted to nail Palin down to a date at which she must declare her candidacy or the games is over, are therefore either ignorant of the facts or purposely attempting to mislead the people. For what difference does it now make to anyone that Romney has announced his candidacy on the specific date he chose to do so or that Perry’s announcement came after Romney’s?

Since these are the same individuals who mock the millions of her supporters as idiotic and foolish for allowing themselves to be strung along and taken for a ride, it appears to be the latter. For her supporters are comprised of a diverse group of Americans who are united in that they actually aren’t afraid to think for themselves and haven’t allowed the pundits to decide for them who they must support and vote for. They falsely portray the vast majority of her supporters as cultists, worshipers, and the like, totally ignoring the incredible amounts of knowledge these supporters know about her record, which is why they are ready to do all they can to see her win this nomination. It’s not about the person itself, but about the ideology, record, and achievements behind her, and the clear and bold solutions she constantly presents to ensure success in the future, which no other candidate comes close to her heels.

It’s pretty comical to watch how many who’ve gone utterly berserk over the fact that Palin hasn’t yet announced her candidacy despite her having said last week that there won’t be any announcement before the end of September, are the very same people who’ve had no problem when other candidates such as Perry has retracted his promise from the 2010 campaign not to run for the presidency. If it’s perfectly understandable that times have changed in the last year and a half which thus caused him to have a change of mind, how is that so different from pushing off a decision another couple of days or weeks due to political shifting? This isn’t a reversal on policy such as Perry on Gardasil and Romney on just about everything. The actual timing of the announcement, although it may have an effect on the style and other aspects of her campaign, won’t be of any serious significance to the voters in the weeks and months afterwards.

Ultimately, a decision will be made and we will all be privy to it. Those who’ve mocked and derided her for stringing along her supporters while not planning to run and seeking only publicity and attention will probably be proven wrong, and left to scramble with something somewhat comprehensible in response, while those who’ve had to deal with the scorn and endless name-calling will watch in amusement. For those who laugh last, laugh best.


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: campaign; electon; notrunning; palin; palin2012; primary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Hugin
Never mind that she made a commitment to announce by September, so as not to string people along.

She never made a commitment to announce by the end of September. You'd know that if you were keeping up, or were (GASP!) a Palin supporter.

She has never personally announced a firm time frame for officially declaring her candidacy. What she has done, is agree with a couple of talking heads on a generalized time frame to make her intentions known.

Maybe that's an official promise in your book, but I'm sure that most people watching, realize that she's given the best answers she could, without revealing anything of her actual plans.

As a Palin supporter, I hope she enters soon, but I'm not holding her to any concrete timetable, nor are any other Palin supporters I talk to. It's only her detractors and the chattering class in the MSM that are doing that.

41 posted on 10/02/2011 5:37:50 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; calcowgirl; ...
RE “ Those who’ve mocked and derided her for stringing along her supporters while not planning to run and seeking only publicity and attention will probably be proven wrong, and left to scramble with something somewhat comprehensible in response, while those who’ve had to deal with the scorn and endless name-calling will watch in amusement. For those who laugh last, laugh best.

Another C4P classic. Get on board before it's too late LOL.

42 posted on 10/02/2011 7:19:31 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Name recognition is good as long as it is all positive.

Hers is not.


43 posted on 10/02/2011 7:24:48 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Hey, she is just smarter than you, she is doin’ Sun Tzu.

/sarc


44 posted on 10/02/2011 7:26:19 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
If Palin runs, Bachmann will poll at about 1%.

What does that mean about her name recognition?

:-)

45 posted on 10/02/2011 7:33:11 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Bachmann is sticking it out. Good for her. Seems Queen Bee was agreeing with her lately.


46 posted on 10/02/2011 7:35:16 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Getting ready to eat some crow ? LOL

This C4P author is not as certain as the one the other day who predicted DEFINITELY October 9.


47 posted on 10/02/2011 7:41:30 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
She's okay, got a great conservative voting record for a congresscritter....

No way did she ever run expecting to win. She ran to up her name recognition and to get a better job outside of Minnesota.

I don't blame her for that, Minnesota is a tough place for a conservative.

48 posted on 10/02/2011 7:42:13 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Nah, it will be the “ides of October”, or maybe not.

She doesn’t have to enter to win anyway. LOL


49 posted on 10/02/2011 7:45:43 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
"Another C4P classic. Get on board before it's too late LOL."


It is nice of them to provide us with some amusement.
50 posted on 10/02/2011 7:45:43 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rob777; indylindy
RE :”Another C4P classic. Get on board before it's too late LOL.” .....
It is nice of them to provide us with some amusement.

It's getting so good that I posted one myself Friday. However this C4P author does not appear very confident. The one on Thursday said she will definitely announce a run by October 11. This one ONLY says we will eat crow IF he is right.

51 posted on 10/02/2011 7:53:52 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Does the crow eating go both ways?


52 posted on 10/02/2011 7:56:34 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
RE :"She doesn’t have to enter to win anyway. LOL"

...because she's 'unconventional'..

53 posted on 10/02/2011 7:56:41 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Heck, you eat crow every day and seem to enjoy it.

What way do you like it prepared best, raw, or crispy?

You seem to prefer raunchy dining, is there any kind of crap sandwich you don't like?

54 posted on 10/02/2011 7:57:36 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: indylindy; reaganaut
RE:"Does the crow eating go both ways?"

Saturday reaganaut made a comment about them 'eating crow' and she was accused of not acting Christian-like, by one that will be eating the most of it.

Yet the above says..

55 posted on 10/02/2011 8:01:03 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

A Palin victory won’t have a faux Roman coliseum for a victory arena.

Nor will her campaign be a 24/7 onslaught on the air waves blaming others.

Her message will be brief, honest and to the point, all the rest will imitate her to strive to even be close to her rising popularity.

This election will NOT be bought and paid for, America has wizened up how the money shuffle is working for the dems.


56 posted on 10/02/2011 8:03:09 PM PDT by Eye of Unk (Sarah Palin and John Bolton--- 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; indylindy
RE :”You seem to prefer raunchy dining, is there any kind of crap sandwich you don't like?

I got a copy of your secret loyalty test used to separate the ‘true believers’ from the PDSers.

1) Who is your ONLY possible candidate, unless she directs you otherwise to another?
2) How long will you wait for her to announce?
3) How do you address (hint nick-name, hint :’P..’) and treat anyone that doesnt pass this test?
4) Who is the biggest ‘threat’ to everyone ‘bad’, ‘bad’ meaning those who dont pass this test?
5) If someone asks you what her specific position is on ....what do you tell them?

Every day more and more people are failing your test and your list grows longer and longer.

57 posted on 10/02/2011 8:03:50 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
My test? Good grief, you are so pathetic...

However, every day, you just prove what a miserable, has no life person you are.

No one listens to you, no one likes you...just change your poster name to sickomyself, it would be best.

58 posted on 10/02/2011 8:09:40 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
RE:"My test? "

Yep, looks like another personality cult has moved into town and many of them are as aggressive as you are, except they are not buying your 'join me in what-ever or I will insult you' line.

Justice??? I would say so. I got the popcorn.

59 posted on 10/02/2011 8:15:18 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Over-taxed means 'paying too much in taxes', not zero taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The most unconventional evah!


60 posted on 10/02/2011 8:18:21 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson