[grey_whiskers]

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

*PING* to late-night birdcage liner!

(Considering the source, it's hot merde-on-merde action.)

Cheers!

[GlockLady]

Gadzooks!
Have you ever hit the nail on the head, there, grey_whiskers. :)

[Lakeshark]

Well said GW.

[MHGinTN]

Aw right, Professor, that was a great essay! ... Now rewrite it, bring it to 300 words max, and shorten your sentences to no more than nine words on average. {Hey, that’s what you professors did/do to me, Professor, you need the same back slap!] BTW, keep the jewels coming, Whiskers.

[One Name]

Dude- you should let the pressure out of the steam kettle more often! A lot to distill there...

But, you are right on. If I could offer a synopsis-

1.The Founders had a great Divinely-inspired Plan.

2. We have radically departed from above Plan.

3. We need to return to the Plan or face certain destruction.

4. Sarah Palin has been annointed by God to return this nation to favor with God.

5. She is hated by the enemies of God.

6. We have one last chance to right this ship.

I have been saying this for a while now. God Bless America.

[FreeReign]

LOL. Sarah's bus tour indeed.

[GregoryFul]

But her politics are our national cure – Palinitis – and we have a lifesaving dose.

It is the politics of security.

It’s the politics of love.

It’s the politics of honesty and sunlight (as her term in Alaska proved).

It’s the politics of genuineness (as her own emails proved).

It’s the politics of hard work.

It’s the politics of personal responsibility instead of sponging.

It’s the politics of conquering ignorance with true knowledge.

It’s the politics of restoration (as her bus tour said).

But, most of all, it is the politics of generosity -- to set people free from dependence, into self-reliance "If the Son make you Free, you shall be free indeed".

You betcha!

[Jeff Head]

GO SARAH GO!

[basil]

Ping!

[piytar]

“grey_whiskers is a contributor of political commentary at Free Republic online”

You are the anti-blog-pimp, kind of like Palin is the anti-obama.

Good content. May need some help on form, and then you may have a real future as a conservative political commentator...

[grey_whiskers]

*PING* -- rewriting a moonbat's anti-Palin article to reflect reality.

Cheers!

[Windflier]

Wow! Now that's a real labor of love. Outstanding!

[thecodont]

A masterpiece! Thank you!

[M-cubed]

“He who…” construction I’ve heard her use before. There’s definitely some reference to the Bible or one of the founding fathers or some other loathsome conservative source from the past loaded up in that phrasing, but I’m not conservative enough or open-minded enough to have any hope of recognizing it. <<<

GOOGLE: He who......google does it for ya

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

Worth reading PING!

[Louis Foxwell]

That is a piece deserving of reading from a teleprompter on a dais by every wannabe commentator on the left, right or middle before a crowd of from dozens to thousands on TV, radio and the web. I love jointed rambling.

How saucy, how bright, how well mannered. We all need lessons in chivalry.
I love the thought that a responsible citizenry should always elect a Sarah Palin. Indeed why would they not? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I cherish your writing and the thoughts that give it meat.

[JimRed]

Entire article posted, no pimping! Let us all reward the poster by a visit.

[exit82]

My FRiend, there were so many flashes of brilliance in your writing, I had to wear sunglasses while reading this article.

Brava!!!

BTTT.

[exit82]

Re: post 56—it should have said “Bravo!”.

Had a gender mix-up.

[exit82]

Obama come across as incoherent, whereas Sarah comes across as so genuinely excited that her sentences splash into an iridescent fountain of thought, seemingly unconnected until the observer stands back, to be amazed at the verbal equivalent of a Seurat masterpiece.

One of my favorite flashes of brilliance in this piece.