Posted on 06/01/2011 7:09:22 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Levin says it would be better if some of these ‘conservatives’ on Fox News who reject Sarah Palin would just come out and say it instead of telling us over and over she can’t win. He specifically calls out Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer, and Bill O’Reilly and says it’s remarkable that they know who can win and who can’t. He goes on:
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
Actually, I was thinking about the time some union Democrats were responsible for repair of a malfunctioning voting machine. Mix in the new black pampers....
My comment was in regards to Krauthammer, Hume and O’reilly, not Fox news as a whole.
Include George Will (Do you want to let Sarah Palin have nuclear weapons?) and Dick Morris (my poll question was: Given the amount of personal baggage that Sarah Palin has, would you vote for her for president?).
Exactly. I wouldn't call them "Fair and Balanced" and I certainly wouldn't call them "Right Wing Faux News", just less biased to the left than the other organs.
There will be many outing themselves before this campaign season is over with.
Right on... right on... right on!!!
LLS
That’s good, so long as we don’t allow them to resume the pretense of conservatism after the election.
I’m not planning on going there. I like it here.
“So what is it? What’s the problem?” he said. “She’s solid on social issues. She’s solid on fiscal issues. She’s solid against these subsidies against big companies – in other words, she is not a corporatist. She’s not a crony or a believer in that. She’s solid on taxes and spending. I’m just confused. She’s solid on Israel. She’s solid on the military. She’s solid with respect to our allies. Is there some big issue that’s disqualifying? What – because the liberals don’t like her? …
“I’m getting sick and tired, as I said yesterday, last week and I’ve said over the months – I’m getting sick and tired of these smears by Krauthammer against her,” Levin said. “He’s a thoroughly decent man, I understand, but he doesn’t seem very decent in this regard and I don’t know why. He’s certainly owes us a column or a better explanation, doesn’t he? He wants to influence the outcome.”
Levin saying it well. I’m going to remember these points when I debate my liberal friends. Its best to turn socratic with these points: how do you differ with Palin on subsidies? etc....
Please put me on your ping list.....
Members of Congress include the Senators. Our current president is a former Senator.
The House of Representatives may be what you meant, if I read our comments properly.
Yes, “Congress” includes the House and Senate, but for some reason “Congressmen” usually refers to Representatives, exclusive of Senators. Doesn’t really make sense, but I didn’t start it. But yes, you read me correctly. I mean, House members don’t get elected to the Presidency.
While I agree with your sentiments, I wish that you would lady up with the language.
They have M.C. after their names: Member of Congress.
The difference is important, just as the difference between calling our nation a Democracy or a Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.