Just one of 5 of identical character pairs. A mathematical impossibility.
Posted on 05/04/2011 3:23:20 PM PDT by butterdezillion
HOW WE KNOW OBAMA'S LONG-FORM IS A FORGERY - NO COMPUTER KNOWLEDGE NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND:
The only non-manipulable image of Obama’s long-form that would have to show the certifying seal is an alleged photograph of the certified long-form. Unlike scans or black and white photocopies, actual photos always show evidence of a seal, as I document here through photographs of my own daughter’s death certificate.
But the alleged photo of Obama’s certified long-form shows no sign of a seal.
That proves that what he showed reporters was NOT the certified copy he received from the HDOH. It had no seal, and the reporters totally spaced off what any one of us who researches this stuff would have immediately checked, since it is the only part that gives the paper any legal value.
Obama had certified copies from the HDOH and he chose to present to the entire world something else, while CLAIMING it was what the HDOH sent him. Presumably it was a print-out of the manipulated PDF. If no manipulation had been necessary Obama could have simply shown the media the actual certified copy, as he CLAIMED to do. The absence of the seal gives it all away.
I don't know how to post the PDF here. It has the images and explanation. Here's a direct link to it: http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/longform-forgery-for-dummies.pdf If somebody knows how to post the whole thing here, I would be eternally grateful if they did. =)
Ping
I’m not much of a techie, but I found this -
Thanks. Looks like that uses scribd, which always seems slow and awkward for me. Might be just as easy to click to see it on the blog. The direct clickable link is http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/longform-forgery-for-dummies.pdf
I’m trying not to be a blog pimp, but it’s tough for techno-morons like me. lol
A link is sufficient
http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/longform-forgery-for-dummies.pdf
So could Trump...easy to understand. No seal = not valid.
You should fax/email to Trump as he wanted to wait until the document was examined before commenting further.
Hannity was making fun of the “Birthers” last night and the “Osama Deathers.” Hannity would be wise to start reading and looking at the evidence regarding Zero’s forgery instead of ridiculing those that have legitimate questions.
I was just looking at the comparison at the very end between the photo of what Obama presented and the photo of my daughter’s death certificate. They had the same processing: a digital photo taken which was C&P’ed into my Word document and saved as a PDF. But look at the difference in the way the printed words look. This has nothing to do with layers, file format, or anything. The two were handled in exactly the same way. Like a controlled experiment.
And yet the difference in the appearance surrounding the printed letters is stunning. Obama’s has white all around the words. Mine has no white anywhere.
Obama presented a print-out of a PDF as if it was a certified BC, and the media didn’t even notice. I’m convinced. I believe that fits what at least one of the Youtubes (which I can’t see) said.
I wonder if Trump would be willing to take this up.
People like Hannity only have courage if they have the cover of somebody like Trump.
If what Fitzpatrick was saying is correct, though, some military people may be emboldened by the easily-visible truth that Obama is an illegal usurping deceiver who is committing crimes to the smiles and nods of the entire media and government. That’s really the big story, and if people don’t see that it’s because they are weary of facing it.
For example, if the US gov wanted to “counterfeit” US currency, they could just use the actual gov printing presses...same way, if the state of HI wanted to fake a BC for Obama, they could just do so...
So I have to say, & there is no other way to say it: all charges that the LFBC could be a forgery are utterly illogical.
Maybe someone else with a different type of pen wrote in the date befoe or after Obama's mother signed it. Could have happened that way, but it doesn't smell right to me.
Why didn't Obama's mother just go ahead and write the date right after she signed her name? I think most of us would have signed it that way.
I am very suspicious of Obama's mother's signature because of the way "Stanley", Obama's mother's first name, is clumsily put in parenthesis as if it was an afterthought.
However, the doctor seemed to have used the same type of pen to write his name and the date he signed it.
Just seems odd to me.
The HDOH only needs to refuse to report Obama’s forgery.
And when I asked Janice Okubo directly whether she would report a known forgery to law enforcement she said the law forbids them from revealing ANYTHING about a birth certificate. IOW, they will claim they CAN’T report a known forgery.
Fukino is already on record saying that Obama’s birth record is “half-typed, half-handwritten”. Abercrombie is on record saying it’s “actually written down” in the state archives. None of that matches what has been released and they know it - yet none of them has come out to accuse Obama. The HDOH has already indirectly confirmed in 2 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery, and both of those revealing items are also true for the long-form forgery. These people have known all along that Obama was posting a forgery. They keep working to try to give themselves plausible deniability.
Ultimately, Obama is asking everybody to believe that a document having no seal on it is actually a certified copy of his BC. Nobody who works in an office actually verifying records would buy that for a New York second.
To believe that it is a certified copy requires you to trust your “logic” above your own eyes.
The HDOH may be unwilling to come out with a full forgery right now because they know Trump could be snooping and they need to minimize their criminal liability.
N00b, what is illogical is to believe the composite fabrication is the thing Hawaii sent to barry bassturd. You do realize that the state of Hawaii could know for a fact that what barry ‘released’ is not what they sent, yet they would not have to speak up (why would they since they worship even his spittle) because there will never be a court case allowed to go as far as disclosure. What is illogical is fools who keep joining Freerepublic just to play games defending the lying bass turd playing at being POTUS. You really should tell Axelgreay to write more cogent talking points. You folks are looking really stooooopid.
The same ‘date’ handwriting is on the Nordyke twins’ BC, too.
The fact that the photo of the “certified birth certificate” has no seal shows us that what he presented as a “certified birth certificate” was actually a print-out of something else. Most probably the manipulated PDF.
So we can analyze to try to figure out exactly how the PDF was manipulated but we can prove for certain that he DID manipulate it. That photo of the “certified birth certificate” without a seal gives it all away.
The copied and repositioned little boxes for checking is the one that had me laughing out loud at the stupidity of the forgery.
Yeah. They didn’t even try to cover their tracks.
To democrats and liberals and barry bassturd stcophants working FR of late, that their president has foisted a forgery is of no more importance to them than when sinkEmperor clintoon shook his finger in America’s face and lied with conviction. Truth means nothing to democrats and barry bassturd sycophants.
What ever it is, this is not a photograph of his real, with a seal, long form birth certificate.
Look at the info. at the link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.