What ever it is, this is not a photograph of his real, with a seal, long form birth certificate.
Look at the info. at the link.
Right. The absence of the seal tells us that for sure.
And if you compare the photos of my daughter’s death cert to the photo of Obama’s birth cert, you see a totally different appearance surrounding the typed words. On the real cert, on pink security paper, there is no white space at all. It’s all pink except where the ink is. But on Obama’s there is white surrounding all the print. The same process was used for both those photos: a digital photo C&P’ed into Word and then the whole file saved as a PDF so people could enlarge the images to see clearly. If there was anything goofy from file formats it should have done the same thing to both images.
If I understand correctly, there is a Youtube video where somebody said that those white areas on Obama’s BC prove that it was not actually a scan of print on security paper at all but that the security paper is a background graphic in the electronic PDF file. If that is the case, then Obama printed out the manipulated PDF using a color printer and tried to pass it off as security paper.
I didn’t put it in this particular article - probably will put it in a different article and link to it - but there’s another reason to believe that the copies of the BC that Obama made and distributed were not from the real birth certificate at all: when they scanned the image of the birth certificate to make copies for the reporters, bleed-through from page 2 of their stack of copies (Obama’s COLB, which was under the page being scanned) was picked up by the scanner. (You can see that at http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama-birth-certificate-released-white-house/story?id=13467977 . Have to magnify the image to about 150-175%, tip your screen back, and look near where the doctor’s signature is.)
That wouldn’t happen with a real birth certificate, which HDOH Administrative Rules require to be on heavier security paper. And I have also tested that with my daughter’s death cert, and Danae has tested for me whether bleed-through from a paper behind it would happen when her COLB was scanned as well. Both those documents were on security paper and did NOT allow bleed-through from behind.
It WOULD happen with the White House’s thinner copy paper - as can be seen because the distributed packet’s copy of the COLB (page 2 in their packet, at http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/See-photos-Obama-birth-certificate/ss/events/pl/042711obamabirthcert#photoViewer=/110427/480/urn_publicid_ap_org_ca51d340407f463f82b930c0e3743af0 ) also has page 3 bleeding through on the scan - the lawyer’s letter requesting the BC. So we know that their copy paper is thin enough to allow bleed-through from other pages behind the one being scanned. But security paper would not allow that.
So when they copied the long-form BC it was not from a genuine certified BC. It was scanned from a thinner piece of paper that would allow bleed-through from the page behind it. Like a piece of printer/copier paper you’d use when you printed out a PDF image that had the background cross-hatches removed.
That tells us that the “white copy” of the BC that Obama distributed to the reporters was not taken directly from the certified BC on security paper, but was first printed out on thinner paper and THEN scanned, picking up the bleed-through from the COLB right behind it in the stack.
This will be a lot easier to explain when I can post the actual images and you can see what I’m talking about. I’ll try to get a post up on my blog soon.