Posted on 04/30/2011 9:44:49 AM PDT by patlin
Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery...Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator for CNN.
LISTEN TO BREAKING NEWS
http://www.unicusmagazine.com/MP3/breaking%20news.mp3
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Who is John?
Let's see if Hawaii can reproduce the document.
-PJ
The article takes a sudden bizarre turn. Very very odd.
I wonder if this guy is a plant.
Ping to desktop
The obfuscators claim that OCR caused the layers, but it didn’t. OCR created characters, not layers. If OCR occured, one would be able to do a text search onthe doc. I tried, there is nothing searchable about that PDF the White House released.
Anyone who listened to this whole interview and believes any of this crap...I feel sorry for ya!
Stanley refuted that quantum time travel crap & so do I. Stick to the facts here folks.
UM..DUDE, do you believe everything you read? Did you listen to Robert Stanley refute that claim in the video? My guess is “NOT”.
Just travel forward in time and read it now.
Nothing will happen. Obama is black, and there is no way they will risk burning cities to uphold the Constitution.
The Washington Times is one of the best news papers in the country. If they put thier name to this story it is big.
It wouldn’t be a far reach for him to go from unofficial suspension(current state) to an official suspension.
The real interesting part is if it will stand.
Argument about the validity of the proffered Obama birth certificate is just more obfuscation, and the result of ill-placed focus on the birth certificate instead of the Constitutional question of the Framers’ intent of the ‘natural born’ language. The birth certificate was never anything but a red herring and it seems at the moment to be working perfectly in Obama’s favor.
With all due respect to Mr. Corsi(and I am looking forward to reading his book), the sequence of numbers of the registrations is irrelevant. It is only a matter of when the documents were submitted, and the order in which the registrar’s clerk entered them.
August 4, 1961 was a Friday. According to the released BC, Obama was born that evening after 7pm. Even assuming the paperwork at the hospital was completed immediately for both Obama and the Nordyke twins, which is a function of the hospital staff, the attending physician, and the mother, it would not be handled by the registrar’s office until the following Monday at the earliest. By that time they would all be backed up on the data entry clerk’s desk, and just taken one at a time without regard to the date/time of the child(ren)’s birth. It’s really that simple. We don’t need to conjure conspiracies.
I would point out from personal experience, my twin sons’ registrations are out of sequence. The older twin has a higher registration number than his younger brother. The information for both certificates was provided by me in the hospital; then typed in, either by hospital or the OB’s staff; then signed by the attending physician (four days after the birth), then forwarded to the Dept of Vital Records where they were received and entered (two weeks after the birth). So it is more than probable that children born after my own, whose paperwork was completed more quickly, have lower registrations numbers.
The article sounds plausibe until you get to the part about TIME TRAVEL !
Give me a break!
Maybe the next time you can read the WHOLE article before you post it?
There is nothing to the hospital name, that was all discussed 2 years ago & proven that Kapi’olani is in fact, the correct name & appears on ALL birth certs of children born in that hospital at that time.
Agreed....not only will Congress and the media NOT investigate...the media will strike out at anyone who holds other than the media-accepted view.
They are already in full cry after Trump. When Bachmann appeared on ABC last week she was challenged by Stepawhatshisface to support anything other than the politically correct line on the brith issue...she would not...she failed...and she is finished as a GOP candidate...but the media will not attempt to put her in jail...which would have been her fate had she not given the party line.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.