Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: library user

Argument about the validity of the proffered Obama birth certificate is just more obfuscation, and the result of ill-placed focus on the birth certificate instead of the Constitutional question of the Framers’ intent of the ‘natural born’ language. The birth certificate was never anything but a red herring and it seems at the moment to be working perfectly in Obama’s favor.

With all due respect to Mr. Corsi(and I am looking forward to reading his book), the sequence of numbers of the registrations is irrelevant. It is only a matter of when the documents were submitted, and the order in which the registrar’s clerk entered them.

August 4, 1961 was a Friday. According to the released BC, Obama was born that evening after 7pm. Even assuming the paperwork at the hospital was completed immediately for both Obama and the Nordyke twins, which is a function of the hospital staff, the attending physician, and the mother, it would not be handled by the registrar’s office until the following Monday at the earliest. By that time they would all be backed up on the data entry clerk’s desk, and just taken one at a time without regard to the date/time of the child(ren)’s birth. It’s really that simple. We don’t need to conjure conspiracies.

I would point out from personal experience, my twin sons’ registrations are out of sequence. The older twin has a higher registration number than his younger brother. The information for both certificates was provided by me in the hospital; then typed in, either by hospital or the OB’s staff; then signed by the attending physician (four days after the birth), then forwarded to the Dept of Vital Records where they were received and entered (two weeks after the birth). So it is more than probable that children born after my own, whose paperwork was completed more quickly, have lower registrations numbers.


56 posted on 04/30/2011 10:31:07 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA
The information for both certificates was provided by me in the hospital; then typed in, either by hospital or the OB’s staff; then signed by the attending physician (four days after the birth), then forwarded to the Dept of Vital Records where they were received and entered (two weeks after the birth).

The registration number is presumably assigned by the "Registrar General" whose dated signature appears on the document. Obama's supposedly was signed on August 8, 1961, (a Tuesday) and the Nordykes' were signed three days later.

ML/NJ

106 posted on 04/30/2011 11:05:11 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: EDINVA
August 4, 1961 was a Friday. According to the released BC, Obama was born that evening after 7pm. Even assuming the paperwork at the hospital was completed immediately for both Obama and the Nordyke twins, which is a function of the hospital staff, the attending physician, and the mother, it would not be handled by the registrar’s office until the following Monday at the earliest.

Contrary to what the COLB says, there is NO EVIDENCE of Obozo being born at that hospital, at any time. And NO EIDENCE of Stanley Ann Dunham/aka Obama ever delivering at that hospital. So, I believe he was born elsewhere. Where? God (and a few others) knows. The listing of the hospital as the birth place was given because the "first exam" of the newborn was purportedly done there.

151 posted on 04/30/2011 11:43:12 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson