Posted on 04/30/2011 9:44:49 AM PDT by patlin
Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery...Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator for CNN.
LISTEN TO BREAKING NEWS
http://www.unicusmagazine.com/MP3/breaking%20news.mp3
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
And hate to be trite, but "oh what a wicked web we weave when first we practice to deceive". Certainly fits this massive chaotic mess.
I don’t know who he is but after getting to the part of the story about time travel and Obama briefed in 1982 that he would be elected President.....
I can say the dude is a fruit loop.
Another Con's Certificate thread...
Stanley said that this is bigger than Watergate because of its Constitutional implications and he is calling for Congress & the FBI to investigate. More audio & video at the link
Don't think these Communist-infiltrated and possibly communist-ruled agencies are going to "investigate!"
Maybe they will investigate and come up with their masters pre-ordained verdict: ORIGINAL...PERIOD.
If it’s a fraud, the Donald may be our only hope of getting any attention to it.... Look at where we’ve come as a nation!
The registration number is presumably assigned by the "Registrar General" whose dated signature appears on the document. Obama's supposedly was signed on August 8, 1961, (a Tuesday) and the Nordykes' were signed three days later.
ML/NJ
I don't know if time is on our side....but I pray your latter statement comes true...
Hasn’t Obama waved his privacy rights on the Birth Certificate by allegedly releasing it?
Should Hawaii now allow a team of reporters and experts in to view the holy document?
Seriously, the ball is in Hawaii’s court now.
As much as I wanted to vacation in Hawaii, I will never go or spend a dime in that corrupt state, if they don’t get this issue resolved.
If, as you suggest, it wasn't known as "Kenya", why did that name appear on postage stamps from that era?
Very exiting indeed!
Really? Can you point to a couple of pdf which purport to represent the scanned image of a single document, that have been on the internet since before last week that exhibit similar properties.
Come on! This is gonna be easy for you. Right?
ML/NJ
Let's see.. UFO conspiracy theorist... CIA conspiracy theorist.. I can't even apply the old broken watch adage, as this guy is completely bonkers.
“Yes, scan to PDF when it’s opened in Illustrator. I’ve duplicated this myself. The layers theory has been quite thoroughly debunked.”
Just curious — did it create some color layers and some purely black and white layers when you duplicated it? That’s the latest thing I’ve seen. Some of the layers, including non-text things like the sigs, are monochrome (i.e., no chromatic aberation as is seen with a color scan of actual black text).
You can MAKE it create multiple layers, but you have to set it up that way. And even then it will not make layers like the ones we see in Obambi’s copy, which should have been a simple copy machine copy... like you or I can get.
Let one of these people who think layers are normal PROVE IT- print and then scan the BC obambi supplied, and see if you can make the same ‘layers’
If that is true, then the “Nordyke Twins” birth certificate are also forgeries, because they have identical hospital information to Obama’s “document”. In fact, I believe that Obama’s “certificate” was forged from a scan of the Nordyke document. Every official signature on them is identical, including the “Ukelele”.
No it isn't. It is still full of tracking cookies and pop up MySpace crap.
Either post the entire article or expect that not many FReepers will click on it and will simply discuss the excerpt.
The examiner "blog" sucks in every possible way.
This has been my personal belief all along, that it has nothing to do with his birth place but rather his Indonesian citizenship that he still claimed to have & acted as an adult.
But, even if he had renounced those citizenships when he came of age in 1979, under the definition, he could have never held any other US citizenship, other than that of, citizen by way of birth on the soil only under the 14th Amendment which we will get to shortly.
This man spent the most impressionable years of his life fathered by 2 foreigners, one British/Kenyan and the other Indonesian. The rest of his youth he spent under the wing of a Proud Communist grandfather and also under the wing of the countys most renowned communist at the time, Frank Marshall Davis, who fled the mainland for Hawaii to avoid prosecution. So, for all of BHO aka BHSs young life before he came of age, he either was under the wing of foreigners or citizens who hated America and the Constitution and fought politically to undermine the country and the Constitution until the day they died.
Now some say that because of the Indonesian citizenship, he was automatically disqualified, but this is where I disagree with those claims.
Citizenship at birth can never be changed. History and research are very clear on this point. However, the actions of the person once they become of age, come into play as to qualifications for any elected office, thus the reason for the 14 year requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause V...
You also, now know the 1stof the many ugly truths as to why BHO aka BHS is having such a hard time with foreign policy that is leaving even the toughest of our brave military personnel quaking in their boots.
He hasnt figured out which one, of the sovereign nations he holds allegiance to, is the most important/beneficial to his agenda as of yet. His Global Campaign Tour of 2008, where he made sure to stop in communist country as well as Muslim country announcing to all he is a global citizen (in which he literally is according to court and government records) was my 1st clue that prompted the old saying: Houston, we have a problem.
Former assist US Attorney, Andrew McCarthy, in his most recent eligibilty article at NRO wrote this of the qualifications and stated that Obama was Kenyan at birth which is misleading, Obama was British at birth, Kenya did not gain its sovereignty from Great Britain until Obama was 2 years old:
The overwhelming evidence is that Obama was born an American citizen on Aug. 4, 1961, which almost certainly makes him constitutionally eligible to hold his office. I say almost certainly because Obama, as we shall see, presents complex dual-citizenship issues. For now, lets just stick with whats indisputable: He was also born a Kenyan citizen. In theory, that could raise a question about whether he qualifies as a natural born American an uncharted constitutional concept.
Obama’s mother didn’t know who the father of Obama
I must have missed this tidbit do you have a source? How many black males were in Hawaii in 1961 dating Stanley Ann?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.