Posted on 04/27/2011 2:53:10 PM PDT by RobinMasters
This is getting good... Just when they thought the "release" would put the issue to rest. Let us see if the mainstream media continues the coverup... Below reports from Market Ticker, Drudge Report and The Smoking Gun web site...
Via Market Ticker: Oh C'mon #2 - AP Is Involved?
The AP has also released a "different version" of the document the White House released. [White House Version Embedded Below, Note The Gap Between Date Stamp And "Date Stamped"]
Guys, this is too freaking blatant.
Incidentally, the AP's version was flattened before being PDF'd. Too bad they forgot to do that on the *****house, er, Whitehouse copy.
Heh AP - betcha you won't look at this!
Here's the AP's document snippet on the accepted date:
And now let's have the Whitehouse version:
Look closely at the date stamp. They're not aligned at the top. The error is small, but it's there. Also note the saturation problems in the Whitehouse version in the word "Date" and the fill on the "A".
The mystery deepens, but the evidence is even more damning than it was before: This "document" was tampered with.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Makes you wonder if they were running a contest to see who could do the best forgery.
“And how is that working out for you?
I’ll try to remember to ask you the same thing when he’s voted out in 2012.
But hey.. keep on fighting. Just don’t forget to come back to reality long enough to vote.”
I someone here put a tenth of the effort onto getting this fraud out of the big chair ‘before’ 2012, for legitimately constitutional reasons I may add, as they spend crying over bloggers, then we might not have to wait that long ;)
Well it seems to be Sinclair.
Up until today it was unknown, at least by me.
Is there a point to this?
Is "Sinclair" indicative of some further deeper darker conspiracy?
Linkage to Larry Sinclair perhaps?
You tell me.
Birthers could have a birth canal video of the actual event and still not buy it.
If it didn’t include a GPS locator and time stamp certainly not...
The probable answer to that question would be arrogance.
The same reason why Nixon didn’t burn the tapes the second after Butterfield blabbed to Ervin’s committee about them.
I = ‘If’
You can't recall a president having failed to be re-elected?
Really?
And, there has been a bunch of it today.
“OMG. OMG. OMG. Are you really serious? You do know there is a different standard for citizenship when it comes to the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces? You do know that right?”
Our first nine Presidents were all born in British territories and were not, by this modern standard, ‘natural born citizens’. And up until 1815 the United Kingdom considered all US citizens to also be subjects of the Crown. Under that latter definition then even Abraham Lincoln was not a ‘natural born citizen’ because at birth both of his parents had been born in the UK and and that he’d also held dual citizenship until after his fifth birthday.
My point is to stop pounding on this and to move on to something else because the Supreme Court has already made clear that they’re not interested in challenges to Obama’s qualifications.
That said, let’s focus on the next election and on subjects that will resolve this problem at noon on January 20, 2013.
Some comb over boy, reality tv star forced the president of the United States to cough up a personal document which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this president does not meet Article 2 Sect 1. concerning eligibility for the office in which he now sits.
The presumed presidents approval numbers are hovering (officially) in the mid 30's.
The biased mainstream media continues the drip, drip, drip of slow abandonment for the presumed president.
Let this incessant clamor for more documents continue to demonstrate to the American people that the presumed president is a liar and a fraud and the pressure on Congress to begin impeachment proceedings will be enormous. The sticking point will be the liberal Senate, I will grant you that, but Obama (sic) being the weakling bully that he is, will possibly resign / hand himself over to the authorities and we'll not have to get to a vote for removal in Reids Senate diaper room
Huh, you suggested attacking the issues, then implied it is working.
I then asked you which one.
So which one?
The question I’ve been asking has not yet been answered. Does anyone know if an American citizen legally becomes a citizen of another country, is he still considered also an American citizen?
Great thought! What if the real Barack Obama died and this President guy just assumed his identity.
True (sorta) today but was the 14th amendment given that interpretation in 1961? If the accepted usage at the time was that it applied only to the newly freed slaves after the Civil War and was subject to a broader interpretation at a later date does the "broader interpretation" apply retroactively?
Murky waters ahead...
Regards,
GtG
If this issue isn’t important to you, then why sta here and stop us from having our own crazy time. Wha tdo you care?
Why not just shut up and laugh at us or go away?
The "original" birth certificate on FactCheck, which we all know now is bogus, had a doctor listed that is not Sinclair. Their "proof" was some old broad that said so. Guess what...FactCheck lied......hit FactCheck.org to see what they are saying now......
I don't see any doctor listed at all
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible..."
Talking points are out, all the noobs are repeating this over and over.....
Oh yeah, #8 was born in the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
