Posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:22 AM PDT by DBCJR
President Obama hopes to finally end questions about his citizenship with the release of his long-form Hawaiian birth certificate.
Obama said in a brief appearance before the cameras Wednesday morning that he decided on the release because the conspiracy theory over where he was born had eclipsed the debate on the budget.
We do not have time for this kind of silliness, Obama told reporters. Ive got better stuff to do.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Exactly. It took 5 minutes. Why not do this 3 years ago?
I have better stuff to do, now if you will excuse me, I have to go do oprah.
We do not have time for this kind of silliness, Obama told reporters. Ive got better stuff to do. ...
“Now I have to get back to work for the American People.” Pres. Clinton after Lewinsky.
>>We do not have time for this kind of silliness, Obama told reporters. Ive got better stuff to do. <<
This is a flip flop. You don’t spend millions trying to hide something and then release it with the above comment.
That is just stupid. Literally.
I used to post politico stuff yet found them zealots for the left. No balance, no reason. They are cheerleaders for Obama. Will they know admit that US voters had a legitimate interest in securing more info on the issue?
I agree I see no difference it is a new copy of the old form. Will Trump let this go?
I’ve read that the oft repeated “spent millions” comment as originally reported in WND is not true. Do you have a verifiable source?
Of course Zero had to respond to Trump on the bc issue, because Trump was also pushing the issue of the Rezko land deal, his admittance to Columbia and Harvard and grades, and coming up would have been the SSN issue.
So Obama had to pre-empt The Donald and attempt to shut him down. Let’s see if Trump is satisfied with today’s release.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2711185/posts
Took that long to find the right paper, ink and forger.
So up until now, for nearly 3 years, you did have time for silliness, and you didn't have 'better stuff' to do?
Exactly. It took 5 minutes. Why not do this 3 years ago?
Took that long to find the right paper, ink and forger.
................................................
Look at the document...it is superimposed on a different background that contains Onaka’s signature (hint: look at the curling on the left-hand margin of the text fields).
I'm not a document expert, but this smells very much like a fake. Maybe it is because 0bama has been a habitual liar from the start.
He released the same old COLB.
If The Donald doesn't make an issue of this, it means the whole thing was a charade on his part, and he's really just a stalking-horse for The Won.
Why did Hawaiian governor Abercrombie say there “was no birth certificate” just six weeks ago? Had they not finished photoshopping one then? There have been several versions of the COLB, but no original birth certificate with the signature of the attending physician.
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
On Youtube there is an episode of a 70’s TV game show where the answer to a question that today would be “gay” or “homosexual”. But in this show, the “normal and acceptable answer” was “queer”.
But this document reeks of modern modification because of a similar concept: In 1961, blacks were called negro, colored, darkie, and several other less accepted names, but they were NEVER called “African” as Urkel’s father was in this document. An American adult in 1961 would no more have called a negro “African” than they would have called a homosexual “gay”. That alone is enough to raise huge questions about this document.
An within a context of paying millions to hide it only to eventually produce a “completely harmless” document is what is causing so much speculation on the document’s authenticity. And the effort to hide it was made at a time when Urkel said he was going to be more open than any president.
The whole thing reeks. I realized six months ago that the well had been poisoned: That any document he released confirming what he has been claiming could not be trusted and would not be. The window of opportunity to come clean (even if this document is authentic) expired over a year ago. This will never be resolved.
We are reaching that point with the college transcripts. Life is not a John Grisham novel.
I have a question. If you are legally adopted, do they go back and make changes to your birth certificate, particularly if there is a name change? If so, where are the changes for this COLB and why is there access to the “original”?
Abstract in Merriam/Webster dictionary says:
1c - insufficiently factual
2 - expressing a quality apart from the original
4 - having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.