Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama releases long-form birth certificate
Politico ^ | 4/27/11 10:31 AM EDT

Posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:22 AM PDT by DBCJR

President Obama hopes to finally end questions about his citizenship with the release of his long-form Hawaiian birth certificate.

Obama said in a brief appearance before the cameras Wednesday morning that he decided on the release because the conspiracy theory over where he was born had eclipsed the debate on the budget.

“We do not have time for this kind of silliness,” Obama told reporters. “I’ve got better stuff to do.”

...

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; colbfake; dualcitizenship; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
Why did it take so long?
1 posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:30 AM PDT by DBCJR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Why did it take so long?

Exactly. It took 5 minutes. Why not do this 3 years ago?

2 posted on 04/27/2011 7:52:42 AM PDT by Pete (29thday.org Exponential problems require exponential solutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
This is not the long form birth certificate. This is a COLB yet again. Who was the attending physician?
3 posted on 04/27/2011 7:53:20 AM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

I have better stuff to do, now if you will excuse me, I have to go do oprah.


4 posted on 04/27/2011 7:53:23 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

“We do not have time for this kind of silliness,” Obama told reporters. “I’ve got better stuff to do.” ...

“Now I have to get back to work for the American People.” Pres. Clinton after Lewinsky.


5 posted on 04/27/2011 7:53:54 AM PDT by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

>>“We do not have time for this kind of silliness,” Obama told reporters. “I’ve got better stuff to do.” <<

This is a flip flop. You don’t spend millions trying to hide something and then release it with the above comment.

That is just stupid. Literally.


6 posted on 04/27/2011 7:54:46 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

I used to post politico stuff yet found them zealots for the left. No balance, no reason. They are cheerleaders for Obama. Will they know admit that US voters had a legitimate interest in securing more info on the issue?


7 posted on 04/27/2011 7:56:12 AM PDT by SonsOfLibertyII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I agree I see no difference it is a new copy of the old form. Will Trump let this go?


8 posted on 04/27/2011 7:56:51 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (Social engineers build bad bridges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

I’ve read that the oft repeated “spent millions” comment as originally reported in WND is not true. Do you have a verifiable source?


9 posted on 04/27/2011 7:57:42 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Of course Zero had to respond to Trump on the bc issue, because Trump was also pushing the issue of the Rezko land deal, his admittance to Columbia and Harvard and grades, and coming up would have been the SSN issue.

So Obama had to pre-empt The Donald and attempt to shut him down. Let’s see if Trump is satisfied with today’s release.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2711185/posts


10 posted on 04/27/2011 7:58:10 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Exactly. It took 5 minutes. Why not do this 3 years ago?

Took that long to find the right paper, ink and forger.

11 posted on 04/27/2011 7:59:47 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
“We do not have time for this kind of silliness. I’ve got better stuff to do.”

So up until now, for nearly 3 years, you did have time for silliness, and you didn't have 'better stuff' to do?

12 posted on 04/27/2011 8:01:38 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Exactly. It took 5 minutes. Why not do this 3 years ago?
Took that long to find the right paper, ink and forger.

................................................

Look at the document...it is superimposed on a different background that contains Onaka’s signature (hint: look at the curling on the left-hand margin of the text fields).


13 posted on 04/27/2011 8:02:26 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Unfortunately, this will satisfy 99% of the public and all the simpletons in the media. They will proclaim the issue dead.

I'm not a document expert, but this smells very much like a fake. Maybe it is because 0bama has been a habitual liar from the start.

14 posted on 04/27/2011 8:02:28 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
No, he didn't.

He released the same old COLB.

If The Donald doesn't make an issue of this, it means the whole thing was a charade on his part, and he's really just a stalking-horse for The Won.

15 posted on 04/27/2011 8:02:41 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When and why did Steve Dunham change his name to Barack Hussein Obama? When he converted to Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Why did Hawaiian governor Abercrombie say there “was no birth certificate” just six weeks ago? Had they not finished photoshopping one then? There have been several versions of the COLB, but no original birth certificate with the signature of the attending physician.


16 posted on 04/27/2011 8:03:13 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


17 posted on 04/27/2011 8:03:43 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

On Youtube there is an episode of a 70’s TV game show where the answer to a question that today would be “gay” or “homosexual”. But in this show, the “normal and acceptable answer” was “queer”.

But this document reeks of modern modification because of a similar concept: In 1961, blacks were called negro, colored, darkie, and several other less accepted names, but they were NEVER called “African” as Urkel’s father was in this document. An American adult in 1961 would no more have called a negro “African” than they would have called a homosexual “gay”. That alone is enough to raise huge questions about this document.

An within a context of paying millions to hide it only to eventually produce a “completely harmless” document is what is causing so much speculation on the document’s authenticity. And the effort to hide it was made at a time when Urkel said he was going to be more open than any president.

The whole thing reeks. I realized six months ago that the well had been poisoned: That any document he released confirming what he has been claiming could not be trusted and would not be. The window of opportunity to come clean (even if this document is authentic) expired over a year ago. This will never be resolved.

We are reaching that point with the college transcripts. Life is not a John Grisham novel.


18 posted on 04/27/2011 8:05:09 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have a question. If you are legally adopted, do they go back and make changes to your birth certificate, particularly if there is a name change? If so, where are the changes for this COLB and why is there access to the “original”?


19 posted on 04/27/2011 8:06:24 AM PDT by cumbo78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Key is the wording at the bottom.
Nordyke one says "true and CORRECT copy".
Obama one says "true copy or ABSTRACT".

Abstract in Merriam/Webster dictionary says:
1c - insufficiently factual
2 - expressing a quality apart from the original
4 - having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content.

20 posted on 04/27/2011 8:06:42 AM PDT by LivingNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson