Aw... shucks...
Posted on 04/02/2011 8:54:17 AM PDT by patriotgal1787
. . . . .
Dear readers,
If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times or more --- how can a guy who does as much reporting on what's going on in the World of Soros miss this? How can a guy who claims to be able to piece disparate pieces together to see the big picture miss this? How can a guy who tells his viewers and listeners to "Question with Boldness" and seek the truth because "The Truth Has No Agenda" deliberately turn his back on what is so glaringly obvious to millions of us? If he can uncover and report day after day on the evil being perpetrated on America by some of the most powerful people in the world, why won't he report on this?
Glenn Beck is anything but stupid. The incredibly talented Beck is nobody's fool. He knows better than most about what is going on behind the curtain, under the surface, in the back rooms. So what gives?
Has he been told to keep his mouth shut? Has he been told his children's lives are in danger if he shines a spotlight on Obama's eligibility? Has he been told he can go anywhere but "there"? Is the truth something so horrible he refrains from telling us because... because... what?
And if Beck's been threatened, what makes this any different from all the other threats he's received that requires him to have 24-hour security protection? What's he been told? Who told him? What does Beck know that we don't?
For a guy who claims to have America's best interests at heart and has dedicated his career to promoting and educating America about the values and history of our Founders and the founding documents, why does he actively disparage those who do "question with boldness" this socialist mystery man in our White House? Who has gotten to Beck?
On this very serious issue, Beck is playing the fool -- the rodeo clown. And never more so than when he makes his weekly appearances as the galoomphy buffoon playing off Bill O'Bloviator's superciliousness. (Lord, that man is an overrated ignoramus.)
When Beck starts with this foolishness, I turn him off. His mockery of those who question with boldness about something he obviously does not want to go near, insults us all. I am personally disappointed in him. And sadly, reluctantly, question his credibility. Every time he opens his mouth to disparage "birthers", he damages himself in the eyes of millions. I shake my head in wonderment. How can he be so stupid? If he honestly doesn't agree that it is a major issue, just shut up about it already. Why insult most of your audience? Or is he trying to signal us that this is such a dangerous area that he is dissuading us from pursuing it? It is baffling.
Note in the video below that Beck and O'Bloviator never address the essential issue Trump has brought forward about Obama's eligibility. Instead they dissect why Trump is making "provocative" statements, deciding it's "because he likes the attention."
O'Bloviator's so ignorant, one wouldn't expect him to think it through any deeper than "announcements were published int he newspaper. But Beck is brighter than that. He's not a stupid man. So who has gotten to him? Who has gotten to Beck???
Pay close attention to what O'Bloviator says at the very end of the segment when he responds to Beck's comment about stating the truth of what's going on: "But then you and I would be off the air."
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m8W8xc9AoE&feature=player_embedded#at=19]
. . . . .
Actually...I was living in Elkton, Maryland, at the time and I could only get his program in the parking lot of our local supermarket! :-)
So?....Now I am curious. What did he say about Vince Foster?
Beck NEEDS Obama. He needs him to be controversial. He needs there to be turmoil in the country. He needs something to preach about. If all was well Beck wouldn’t have a job.
Soros’ threat is more than just a threat to kill people; the threat is that he and his communist-Islamist allies will make a run on the bank that makes the Sept 2008 run pale by comparison.
Just like the mafia puts a horse head on somebody’s pillow to say that they are fully capable of carrying out their threats, the September 2008 run on the bank is a deposit guaranteeing what is to come if anybody balks.
Why do you think Beck is so sure that there is going to be complete financial collapse? Why do you think he is telling everybody to be prepared and get “food insurance”? Glenn Beck is probably the one person who fully grasps what Soros is capable of.
Beck is choosing to live (by complying with the “rules” on the eligibility issue) so he can fight another day (confront Soros’ wider plan, which is a full communist-Islamist takeover of the world economy - something that only Glenn Beck has been willing to connect the dots on and point out). Glenn Beck “gets it”. He knows this isn’t just about his family being safe. He knows if Soros is successful there is literally going to be a whole world of hurt, including financial collapse and an Islamic caliphate. Kind of like the Bible hints at in Revelation with the two beasts and the mark of the beast being required to buy and sell. Beck has pointed out that what Revelation hints at and what Ahmadinejad is trying to get to happen (and now believes is very close at hand) are basically the same thing. He is WAY ahead of the curve in recognizing where this is all heading. This isn’t just your run-of-the-mill mafia threat to kill you and your family; it’s much bigger than that.
Within a single day “somebody” convinced Bush that the whole world as we know it would fall apart if we didn’t pass TARP (which all the financial advisors said was a drop in the bucket that was pretty much a token gesture, and the months-long delay in the passage of TARP without damaging the economy demonstrated that fact as well).... AND convinced John McCain to suspend his campaign and try to cancel the debates which alone could lift him to win (IOW, they convinced McCain to give up the election). Those guys have been living with personal threats for a long time; it took something much, much bigger to scare the crap out of them, and it happened to both of them on the exact same day.
I became very suspicious about Foster when news leaked that his office was raided by three Clinton aids the night of his death. (At least two of them were Hillary's aids. I'm doing this from memory. Right now, I'm too lazy to go searching for the details.) Foster was killed in July 93. This was in Dec 93. During the middle of January, I got through to Rush's show wanting to talk about Foster and was told by Snerdley, (James Golden, really, but all of Rush's early screeners were Snerdleys.) "We're not ready to talk about that yet."
Toward the end of January, the NY Post published the first of Chris Ruddy's investigative articles that briefly broke the media silence about Foster. Rush led with the story that day (At least I think he led with it. He certainly talked about it during the opening monologue.) I got through again that day, and was the first caller permitted to talk about my suspicions regarding the Foster death.
This opened the floodgates and Rush talked frequently for about a month about questions surrounding Foster's death. I'm not sure he said so then, but it is important to remember that Rush was out of the country being given a VIP tour of Israel when Foster was murdered so he probably knew little about the event when it happened.
Then in March, Rush reported a rumor that supposedly came from Senator Moynahan's office (D-NY) that Foster had been murdered in an apartment used by Hillary and friends. I forget all the details but I'll end with a link where you might be able to get some of them. Within an hour of reporting this, Rush said that he had found out from a source he trusted (my guess, Chris Ruddy) that it wasn't true.
But the damage had been done. A left-wing media group that called itself FAIR took out full page newspaper ads suggesting that someone so irresponsible should not be allowed to be on the air. Maybe they called for sponsor boycotts, I don't remember. But they were certainly aided by their willing accomplices in the media in calling for Rush's scalp. IMHO, they were nearly successful.
There was a huge amount of disinformation put out during those days about Foster. (He was running money to Switzerland. He was involved in clandestine activities. He was involved in the Whitewater scandal.) The Moynahan rumor was probably part of this disinformation. Such stuff was used to discredit anyone with influence who repeated it.
There is even less known about Barack Obama's past than was known about the circumstances of Vincent Foster's death. I'm sure there is quite a bit of disinformation in what some think they know about Obama's past. And someone like Rush has to be very careful about repeating any of it. So he is.
I said I would give you a link where you can read some more about the Monayhan rumor. This is from an old newsgroup that I participated in and the discussion occurs soon after Rush reported the rumor. (Moynahan's office supposedly said it originated from the Smick-Johnson Investment firm so you may see these names associated with the rumor rather than Moynahan's.) If you search there for "Switzer" who used to post daily summaries of Rush's show, you will be able to see relevant parts from his summary of that first show where Rush discussed the Foster death.
ML/NJ
I have found the conservative blackout on the topic of Obama’s natural born citizenship to be very frustrating. Rush, though, has at least been polite to the the birthers ( proofers).
This guy would have had access, but the original doesn’t exist:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/show.aspx?userurl=rcr&year=2011&month=04&day=01&url=reality-check-radio
There’s an index notation about it. Original is gone. Seems most likely a deal was cut between Dem/Repub elite that McCain would run; Obama would run. Obama looked to be a long shot at best at the time.
Obama will battle it out in the court system until his presidency is over. Welcome to the Banana Republic of the United States.
By the way post #203 is very interesting.
Sheeesh
You sort of said that already. Thanks.
ML/NJ
Believing that Obama and his enablers have perpetrated the unimaginal fraud on this Nation, I don’t want him or his family living off me,my children or grand children the rest of their, the Obamas, lives. The punishment for such a crime must begin when discovery of facts are validated. To let the crime go on would be like letting an identified bank robber spend his loot before arresting him. The impact that Obama and his enablers have and would put on my chilren and granchildren leaves no consideration for kindness to his family.
I think what Beck has already uncovered regarding Soros is more of a threat than the birther issue.
Sorry, I can’t buy into your theory.
Well, now...isn’t that the perfect reference. lol
Good on you, Elsie! I love it!
He was told if he ignores the eligibility issue he would be given a shot at Katie’s chair on the Evening News when she leaves. Or so I heard...
Hey!
I've heard that, too!!
3 days ago...
They would be DEAD!!!
There is a real possibility (I would say probability) that a non-citizen is serving as our Commander in Chief. You can't be a supporter and interpreter of the Constitution and, at the same time, treat this concern as a joke, or as something too trivial to be discussed!
This goes for Mark Levin as well. Until they are willing to address this issue, I will NOT consider either of these individuals to be a serious commentator on Constitutional questions.
Love that one, too. ;o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.