Posted on 03/12/2011 9:54:29 PM PST by thecodont
Continuing to thwart the United States Constitution and the people’s will, the Obama-Jarrett administration appears to be bribing the states considering eligibility legislation. Already Georgia* and New Hampshire’s eligibility bills will be postponed to 2013, clearly to protect Obama. And although there are signs of improvement in the language of the Arizona bill, what do you want to bet that will be postponed too?
The way the bribe is being set up only reinforces our own research that Congress is engaged in the cover up of the usurpation.
The goal is to reduce or threaten federal funding for key infrastructure projects in those states that have eligibility bills. But in order to hide the extortion, the reductions in funding must appear to come from Congress, specifically the republicans in Congress. Whatever loophole is left the democrat-controlled Senate will fix.
This is the federal government extracting behavior out of the states by leveraging our tax dollars. It is power the Founders never wanted our federal government to have.
(Excerpt) Read more at drkatesview.wordpress.com ...
The republican primary candidate who is brave enough to take on obama directly, get in his face and call him on all the crap he’s gotten away with, gets my vote. I don’t care who it is at this point. I just want the POS out of office.
No, it doesn't end in 2012. Even if defeated, or if Obama is a one-term president, we are stuck with his judicial appointments and legislation.
If Obama is not a natural born citizen we, as conservatives, must see that he is removed, charged with a crime, and convicted.
This is **fundamentally** about preserving the rule of law and our beloved Constitution!
Aren’t there enough people active on the issue? What do you think Rush can do? Report every day on the same topic?
Yeah! I really do think he could have done a LOT better!
This year, he did give some serious time in January. Since then he is back to using the Constituton as JOKE.
Rush, even since this year, could do still a lot better in his reporting.
My conclusion: Rush's commitment to the Constitution is about as deep as a thin dime in his pocket.
Your comment that I should want him to use **”every”** minute to discuss Obama’s eligibility is a STRAWMAN of **your** creation! I can not defend a strawman argument that you created.
You post this on nearly every thread. And...It is debunked every time.
Isn’t it time to get some new talking points from the DNC and DOJ?
Without reading further on this thread, I absolutely agree with that sentiment!
(Although with a single caveat, we should not advocate action that would give the WH a basis for imposing martial law or calling out the Guard unless prepared for CW.)
What seems necessary is a Republican revolt v its leadership that presses for a Congressional inquiry which include subpoenas.
In light of the fraud by our Congress over the past two years, the revolt will have to be sparked and conducted by recently elected Republicans and those male and female members of Congress who have had the political balls to publicly challenge the WH over various issues.
Candor7 warned us early on about the incapability’s of "if-HI-says-he-was-born-there-its-good-enough-for-me" Boehner and it seems clear he was correct.
It is up to real Americans, such as most of those here on Free Republic, to hammer their members of Congress on this point.
Calls to our Congressmen and Senators 24/7 asking for an investigation into Zero’s eligibility would be in order.
Factcheck.org????? That is where you are quoting from? hahaha
You both raise excellent points. However, we may be stuck with the single issue of whether there was a non-U.S. birth.
It seems likely the USSC will render its opinion of what is included as an elements of NBC only upon application from Congress. OK, lets assume a sea change in Congress and the court opines NBC requires a citizen father.
O cannot be charged with concealing his parentage. My concern is that the court will state the finding should not be retroactive as the issue was previously unsettled. While that may preclude a second term, it would not likely interupt a second term. I.e., time is of the essence.
Wouldn’t surprise me a bit if he is bribing and/or threatening!
Here we are in only March 2011, nearly a year before presidential primary season, and already the cowardly elected officials of both New Hampshire and Georgia are saying that they won't pass such a law until nearly two years from now in 2013.
For once, the elected officials of the two states have a chance to be courageous and stand up and protect the American people from lying presidential candidates, but, instead, they choose to put their heads in the sand and justify their cowardly actions by saying something like this to themselves:
"It is not our job to screen presidential candidates as to whether or not they lie about themselves on their application forms. Let's push the responsibility onto the backs of the voters on election day so that we don't offend Democrats in Congress and President Obama, and we can still get our blood money from Washington, money we desperately need to run our state. We are sure the good people of New Hampshire and Georgia will understand that we are postponing the passage of the presidential eligibility law only because we care about them and the economy of New Hampshire and Georgia."
I predict that the elected officials of both New Hampshire and Georgia will be treated harshly by history because of their cowardly behavior in allowing a liar and a fraud named Obama to file a presidential application form for the presidential race of 2012 without attaching his long form Hawaii birth certificate, if one even exists.
Factcheck.org????? That is where you are quoting from? hahaha
Mr. Kurt Tsue is still an employee of the State of Hawaii so he can be asked directly at any time if he made that statement.
A committee of the House of Representatives could call him to testify under oath at any time or he could be subpoenaed to appear before a Grand Jury investigation.
How true! No one wants to be responsible or held accountable for seeing that presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible. And when voters do ask they're ignored or written off a loons. And to make matters worse, when voters do take it to the courts we're told we have "no standing".
Tsue may have made that statement and it may indeed be true—today. But not in 1961.
In 1961, there was no such thing as “self-identified” racial classification. When he talks about this issue, he’s talking about today’s process, not the process in 1961.
In 1961, the powers that be decided upon what was going onto the birth record. There was a specific set of racial classifications.
Barack Hussein Obama (senior) would have been classified Negro.
In those days, there wasn’t even a category for “African-American”. Hyphenated Americans didn’t exist. (Not to mention, he wasn’t an “American” of any race. He was a Kenyan.)
Back then, “blacks” were called negroes or coloreds. And that’s a fact, Jack.
It matters not, because he wasn’t racially classified on ANY birth certificate in Hawaii, not contemporaneously. There’s no indication that he was mentioned at all on any original birth certificate, because Tim Adams has said that there is no original birth certificate.
At this point, it’s very possible that there is NOW some sort of document upon which an abstract could be based—such as a late birth certificate given to Obama recently, upon his filing of an affidavit from his now-deceased grandmother and perhaps testimony from interested others. Perhaps on that document, BHO Sr. is named as father and identified by his alleged son or mother-in-law (not by self, since he’s deceased) as “African”.
However, whatever that document that exists NOW may be, it’s not the document from which that alleged scan on FactCheck blog was abstracted, because that scan is based upon nothing. It was produced, all right, by not by Hawaii.
How true! No one wants to be responsible or held accountable for seeing that presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible. And when voters do ask they're ignored or written off a loons. And to make matters worse, when voters do take it to the courts we're told we have "no standing".
******
In a way, the terrible actions by the supposedly responsible elected officials of New Hampshire and Georgia are laughable, because they don't realize what their cowardly actions are telling Obama and the American public about what they think about Obama's long form birth certificate controversy:
They are telling Obama and the public that they doubt that Obama could attach a long form birth certificate to his application if they pass such a presidential eligibility law even if he wanted to.
That is, they don't want to be embarrassed by taking the chance that Obama would skip their states during the presidential primaries, because he can't or won't attach his Hawaii long form birth certificate to his application form, if it even exist.
No doubt George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are turning over in their graves as they watch these elected state officials abandon their duty to do what is best for the American people.
In this case, the American people deserve to have their presidential candidates attach their long form birth certificates to their state application forms so that the American people will be reassured that (1)the candidates were born in the state and on the date they claim, (2)they are who they say they are, and (3)they were NOT adopted at some point in their lives by a citizen of another country.
What a bunch of cowards.
Very true. But it's not the first time this has happened, not by a long shot. It's been going on at least since the era of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
As far as the Obama constitutional eligibility issue is concerned, threats of withholding federal money from a vital Hawaii state government program are believed to be the major reason for Hawaii's state government's obstinate attitude toward multiple requests for release of Obama's birth and school records in the state's possession.
Taitz received from the Social Security Administration the issuance name and his SSAN 4424 that preceded Obama’s most used SSAN 4425. The Connecticut SSAN was issued between March 28, 1977 and April 15 1977. Thomas Wood who was issued the SS number is deceased.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=19708
So when did Obama work at that Hawaiian Baskin Robins?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.