Posted on 02/16/2011 6:17:43 PM PST by Seizethecarp
O'Reilly began a segment tonight by saying that he did not believe the recent poll that showed that 51% of likely GOP primary voters didn't believe that Obama was born in HI. He offered up a different poll showing that 58% of Americans believed Obama was born in HI.
Rove came on and after admitting that Obama could end the birth certificate controversy immediately by simply releasing his birth records, Rove said the controversy benefited Obama.
Then both O'Reilly and Rove equated "birthers" with "truthers" and Ron Paul supporters and said they were on the Tea Party and GOP fringe.
When Rove said he was satisfied that Obama was born in HI and started to refer to the newspaper birth announcements, O'Reilly butted in and said (IIRC) "You got that from me. We broke that here first. We investigated that."
Two RINO’s sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g!
Stop watching O’Reilly. He has sold us out one too many times. When you start trading the truth for an Obama interview you are no longer a reliable source of information. Life is short - don’t waste any more of yours on this jerk.
> “why doesn’t chicken sheet oreilly have a real birther on the factless show to debate? Bring on Orly Taitz, Alan Keyes,jerome corsi etc” <
I emailed O’Reilly after his melt-down a few nights ago. I mentioned Corsi’s forthcoming book by title and challenged him to read it and then have Corsi on for some Q & A.
Let’s see what happens when Corsi’s book, “Where’s The Birth Certificate?” hits the “New York Slimes” Best Seller List.
What sorry combo.
I pray we're not too late to stop them.
Why doesn’t BOR simply show us all the proof he has, instead of just talking about it. Let him lay it all on the table and step by step show his evidence.
Maybe he could write a book about it and then he’d talk about ‘my book’ during every show!!! And he’d end every show with letters from readers saying how great his ‘book’ is!
I agree with O and Rove in this case. With all due respect to my freeper friends who are “birthers”,I find it kind of embarrassing. That said, I had originally thought that this issue was going to work against Conservatives and Republicans, but it looks like it might not. In fact, it may work for them. Who knows, they may be right all along (birthers), in which case, I will eat a large plate of Crow. So while I disagree with the birthers, I wont stoop to ridicule them or question their intelligence, just a difference of opinion.
Ok, so I didn’t bother to read the article before posting. O and Rove are jackasses, and there is a WORLD of difference between being a birther and a truther.. sheesh...
and, most of us would accept good evidence that the creep was eligible and deep in side would be content that the constitution was protected.
911 truthers just want chaos.
Tokyo Rove is still running influence ops to get his boy and Mexico’s favoroite son Jeb Bush the nomination, and Rove will say whatever it takes to smear all other candidates.
O’Reilly is just....
Well. We all know what he is.
I appreciate that. I have been with this constitutional issue from the beginning (before the election) and I always felt or sensed something was fishy. I just wanted Obama to prove his eligibility. There are only 3 requirements to be president. Our wise founders thought they were important enough to include them in the constitution.
Dare I say that anyone of them would fight this fraud to the death if they could be resurrected today>
6. Unlike 9/11 conspiracies, there is only one person involved and is to blame for this fiasco: Obama himself
Frank Luntz asks a sample of Republicans, “How many people think Obama is a Muslim?’’
He gets 50+ percent saying they think he’s a Muslim.
He should also ask: “How many people think Bill Clinton is a Muslim?”
That response (likely to be 0 percent) would help prove that Obama, not the respondents, created the impression.
Same thing with the BC matter. No pollster ever asks a control question.
Just about every one of those 23 items is something I would really like to see for myself, and I believe that any American who wishes to should be able to see any and all of them, any time.
A couple of them- #6 and #7, concerning his Illinois State Senate records, should be a matter of public record. The fact that these aren't available puts the lie to the claim that people who want to see his records are just tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy nutcases.
Rove was talking about the birth announcements in the papers and BOR told him that he got that info from him. Rove said he got the info elsewhere and BOR said that HE was the first one to report it!! What a guy!! A$$hole.
I posted that on another thread but it fits here, too. BOR claimed he investigated the BC issue quite a while ago and has seen the original. The great and powerful OZ has spoken. (barf)
I hit this issue hard before the 2008 issue and for the first 5 or 6 months of the frauds stealing of the presidency.
Yes, I do think this issue was as big as the tax and spend issues when it came to the tea party and America. Real Americans don’t like to be played for fools. We are independent, free thinking, honest and full of basic common sense.
Obama is horrible for all of America. He is hiding and lying about his agenda.
He is wicked.
He always equates the good with the evil, the Republicans with the Democrats, the cost cutters with the spenders, the Right with the Far Left....on and on ad nauseaum.
All this equation is done with the express purpose of the Bloviator proudly announcing he is a person of the "middle", luxuriating in the noble position of being midway between all the "extremists" to the right and left of him.
This is what "fair and balanced" means to him.
Rove is a pathetic little bore, droning away with his poll numbers and statistics, so much so that even O'Reilly told him tonight that the rotund one gives him a splitting headache. For once I agreed with Barfer Bill.
What a pair to draw to.
Leni
(P.S.....see my tagline)
Please don’t take this as anything but a gentle probing so I can try to understand your reaction to this issue. Don’t answer if you don’t want to, but is there something in particular that you find embarrassing, or is there something that you think is shameful about the subject matter or the people who are concerned with the subject matter?
I started out thinking that the eligibility issue was a technicality, something to fall back on if we can’t beat Obama in a fair fight. Sort of like Al Franken challenging every ballot so he can worm it around to a different result than what was clearly the fair result. I wanted conservatives to be too good for that kind of dirty trick.
Is that where you’re at? Are you thinking the subject isn’t nice, or there’s something peevish about the whole thing?
Help me understand where you’re coming from.
I do appreciate it that you don’t feel a need to ridicule or put down those who think differently than you do on this issue, and I hope I will always return that favor.
He may be running scared, but he is enjoying every minute of it at our expense.
How much is Wagu Beef per pound? How much for a trip to Hawaii or India? I am sick to my stomach about this fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.