Skip to comments.
Senator Urges President to Ignore Court Ruling
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^
| 4 Feb 2011
| John Semmens
Posted on 02/04/2011 9:12:28 PM PST by John Semmens
Federal Judge Roger Vinsons ruling that President Obamas health care law is unconstitutional need not be obeyed says Senator Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill).
The Courts arent the only ones authorized to decide the Constitutionality of the laws, Durbin insisted. We allCongress and President, aliketake an oath to uphold the Constitution. Just because the Court has a different opinion doesnt mean the President must accept it.
This wouldnt be the first time a President ignored a Court decision, Durbin observed. Back in the 1830s, President Jackson chose to ignore a Supreme Court decisiontelling then Chief Justice John Marshall to enforce his own decision. So, President Obama ignoring a lower court decision is small potatoes in comparison. In the final analysis, the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The Army and all federal law enforcement personnel answer to him. If he doesnt want to abide by a court decision whos going to make him?
The Court decision President Andrew Jackson chose to ignore was one asserting that Indians had sovereign rights that the US and state governments had to respect. Subsequently, the Cherokee Tribe was forcibly evicted from its land by the US Army so it could be seized by the State of Georgia.
In related news, Obama Administration spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said that Vinsons ruling will have no effect on our implementation of the health care reform law, calling it a rogue decision by a judge who is out of step with modern judicial thinking. It is one thing for courts to make laws that help people. It is another thing entirely when a judge tries to overturn the efforts of Congress and the President to help people. Quite simply, Judge Vinson is guilty of the wrong kind of judicial activism.
read more...
http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/senator-urges-president-to-ignore-court-ruling/
TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Humor
KEYWORDS: constitution; craptire; democrats; judgevinson; obama; satire; stupid; wasteoftime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: John Semmens
It’s nearly impossible to tell the diff between truth and satire anymore.
41
posted on
02/04/2011 11:48:30 PM PST
by
lurk
To: John Semmens
cafeteria constitutionalist ping.
BTW, does merely briefly believing Durbin said this constitute taking the bait, or is it only by actually posting in the mistaken belief he said this that one lands in the fisherman’s hold?
To: John Semmens
43
posted on
02/04/2011 11:58:06 PM PST
by
Ladysmith
("A community organizer can't bitch when communities organize." Rush Limbaugh)
Note to readers. The story is false but they won’t tell you that. The “fish” metaphor is a way to ridicule people for believing the lie. It’s apparently funny that people believe made up stories reported as factual. That’s what “semi-satirical” means.
Remember its funny to be lied to and then ridiculed for believing it, so enjoy yourselves.
44
posted on
02/05/2011 12:03:03 AM PST
by
TN4Liberty
(My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
To: bigbob
To: DaxtonBrown
Payback is a bitch when Palin becomes President.
Will she ever make it there? I mean, the left is full of a truckload of nut cases who will do anything to get their way. Durbin just publicly cast the an important from a standing ranking member of the Senate against SCOTUS.
If they are that brazen the rest of that which is conservative about America is not out of their sites. This is much worse than it seems on a quick read. Think back to the recent shooting by the 24 year old leftist. Consider O's speech's and the MSM's piling on conservatives and all things conservative.
Will we one day be looking back to this time as a point of change in our country? Will we realize we were there(here) in history and did not even realize the seriousness of it?
Do we see it now?
46
posted on
02/05/2011 12:16:15 AM PST
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: Springfield Reformer

"Arrrrr, ye be battered and flash frozen by sun up, matey!"
LOL
47
posted on
02/05/2011 12:22:50 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
To: TigersEye; Prokopton; aquila48; John Semmens
48
posted on
02/05/2011 12:23:21 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: RobRoy
Or he is just plain evil.
All the left is evil. That saying a while ago that "The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise" has really been showing it's veracity in these times of O as president. They seem to really be going all out to take this country any way they can.
The problem is that in these times of this attempted takeover, with no weapons have been shown the "civility" that exists on our side is not taking it as serious as it is.
49
posted on
02/05/2011 12:26:36 AM PST
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: Vendome
50
posted on
02/05/2011 12:34:28 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
To: TigersEye
Guess Ole Macks back in town.
51
posted on
02/05/2011 12:36:11 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: JSteff; DaxtonBrown
Do we see it now?See it? I sure see it, and the view from here is dizzying!
Where is our leverage?
To: John Semmens
Not only is Durbin advocating for a dictatorship, but is also promoting anarchy. If a President can ignore the courts with impunity, there is no “nation of laws” and it is every man for himself.
And to threaten the people with use of the military is a “high crime and misdemeanor.”
53
posted on
02/05/2011 2:35:08 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: John Semmens
This one is a powerhouse.
Good...no...great job.
54
posted on
02/05/2011 2:40:09 AM PST
by
Tainan
(Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
To: John Semmens
55
posted on
02/05/2011 3:51:11 AM PST
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: John Semmens
You just keep skating right on that razor thin edge Johnny.
56
posted on
02/05/2011 4:06:17 AM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: John Semmens
57
posted on
02/05/2011 4:20:21 AM PST
by
McGavin999
("I was there when we had the numbers, but didn't have the principles"-Jim DeMint)
To: csense
“Jackson never said that and he never defied a Supreme Court Ruling.”
Thanks for this. I’d always accepted the “conventional wisdom” (having heard it repeated so many times) and your response motivated me to dig deeper. Unless you and Wikipedia are in cahoots to exonerate Jackson, it would appear you are quite correct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia
58
posted on
02/05/2011 4:38:27 AM PST
by
DrC
To: John Semmens
You got plenty of fish and beef. Enough to feed the whole flock with plenty left over for a week or two. So where is the satire? Great one John!
59
posted on
02/05/2011 5:40:53 AM PST
by
no-to-illegals
(Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
To: John Semmens
John,
Got here late. The kill ratio for this one was exceptional :-)
60
posted on
02/05/2011 5:42:28 AM PST
by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson