Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Urges President to Ignore Court Ruling
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 4 Feb 2011 | John Semmens

Posted on 02/04/2011 9:12:28 PM PST by John Semmens

Federal Judge Roger Vinson’s ruling that President Obama’s health care law is unconstitutional need not be obeyed says Senator Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill).

“The Courts aren’t the only ones authorized to decide the Constitutionality of the laws,” Durbin insisted. “We all—Congress and President, alike—take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Just because the Court has a different opinion doesn’t mean the President must accept it.”

“This wouldn’t be the first time a President ignored a Court decision,” Durbin observed. “Back in the 1830s, President Jackson chose to ignore a Supreme Court decision—telling then Chief Justice John Marshall to enforce his own decision. So, President Obama ignoring a lower court decision is small potatoes in comparison. In the final analysis, the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The Army and all federal law enforcement personnel answer to him. If he doesn’t want to abide by a court decision who’s going to make him?”

The Court decision President Andrew Jackson chose to ignore was one asserting that Indians had sovereign rights that the US and state governments had to respect. Subsequently, the Cherokee Tribe was forcibly evicted from its land by the US Army so it could be seized by the State of Georgia.

In related news, Obama Administration spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said that Vinson’s ruling will have “no effect on our implementation of the health care reform law,” calling it “a rogue decision by a judge who is out of step with modern judicial thinking. It is one thing for courts to make laws that help people. It is another thing entirely when a judge tries to overturn the efforts of Congress and the President to help people. Quite simply, Judge Vinson is guilty of the wrong kind of judicial activism.”

read more...

http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/senator-urges-president-to-ignore-court-ruling/


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Humor
KEYWORDS: constitution; craptire; democrats; judgevinson; obama; satire; stupid; wasteoftime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: John Semmens

It’s nearly impossible to tell the diff between truth and satire anymore.


41 posted on 02/04/2011 11:48:30 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

cafeteria constitutionalist ping.

BTW, does merely briefly believing Durbin said this constitute taking the bait, or is it only by actually posting in the mistaken belief he said this that one lands in the fisherman’s hold?


42 posted on 02/04/2011 11:52:31 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

mark


43 posted on 02/04/2011 11:58:06 PM PST by Ladysmith ("A community organizer can't bitch when communities organize." Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Note to readers. The story is false but they won’t tell you that. The “fish” metaphor is a way to ridicule people for believing the lie. It’s apparently funny that people believe made up stories reported as factual. That’s what “semi-satirical” means.

Remember its funny to be lied to and then ridiculed for believing it, so enjoy yourselves.


44 posted on 02/05/2011 12:03:03 AM PST by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

tubin durbin did say it

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2668418/posts


45 posted on 02/05/2011 12:09:52 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
Payback is a bitch when Palin becomes President.

Will she ever make it there? I mean, the left is full of a truckload of nut cases who will do anything to get their way. Durbin just publicly cast the an important from a standing ranking member of the Senate against SCOTUS.

If they are that brazen the rest of that which is conservative about America is not out of their sites. This is much worse than it seems on a quick read. Think back to the recent shooting by the 24 year old leftist. Consider O's speech's and the MSM's piling on conservatives and all things conservative.

Will we one day be looking back to this time as a point of change in our country? Will we realize we were there(here) in history and did not even realize the seriousness of it?

Do we see it now?
46 posted on 02/05/2011 12:16:15 AM PST by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

"Arrrrr, ye be battered and flash frozen by sun up, matey!"

LOL

47 posted on 02/05/2011 12:22:50 AM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Prokopton; aquila48; John Semmens

48 posted on 02/05/2011 12:23:21 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
Or he is just plain evil.

All the left is evil. That saying a while ago that "The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise" has really been showing it's veracity in these times of O as president. They seem to really be going all out to take this country any way they can.

The problem is that in these times of this attempted takeover, with no weapons have been shown the "civility" that exists on our side is not taking it as serious as it is.
49 posted on 02/05/2011 12:26:36 AM PST by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
And the line forms on the right, babe.
50 posted on 02/05/2011 12:34:28 AM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Guess Ole Macks back in town.


51 posted on 02/05/2011 12:36:11 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JSteff; DaxtonBrown
Do we see it now?

See it? I sure see it, and the view from here is dizzying!

Where is our leverage?

52 posted on 02/05/2011 12:46:01 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Not only is Durbin advocating for a dictatorship, but is also promoting anarchy. If a President can ignore the courts with impunity, there is no “nation of laws” and it is every man for himself.

And to threaten the people with use of the military is a “high crime and misdemeanor.”


53 posted on 02/05/2011 2:35:08 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

This one is a powerhouse.

Good...no...great job.


54 posted on 02/05/2011 2:40:09 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Good one John.


55 posted on 02/05/2011 3:51:11 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

You just keep skating right on that razor thin edge Johnny.


56 posted on 02/05/2011 4:06:17 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Good one John!


57 posted on 02/05/2011 4:20:21 AM PST by McGavin999 ("I was there when we had the numbers, but didn't have the principles"-Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csense

“Jackson never said that and he never defied a Supreme Court Ruling.”

Thanks for this. I’d always accepted the “conventional wisdom” (having heard it repeated so many times) and your response motivated me to dig deeper. Unless you and Wikipedia are in cahoots to exonerate Jackson, it would appear you are quite correct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia


58 posted on 02/05/2011 4:38:27 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

You got plenty of fish and beef. Enough to feed the whole flock with plenty left over for a week or two. So where is the satire? Great one John!


59 posted on 02/05/2011 5:40:53 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
John,

Got here late. The kill ratio for this one was exceptional :-)

60 posted on 02/05/2011 5:42:28 AM PST by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson