Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Delay's Attorney Blames Tea Party for Jail Sentence (Leftist Spin Title)
Yahoo ^ | 01/13/2011 | William Tapscott, Yahoo! Contributor Network

Posted on 01/13/2011 2:29:33 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan

On January 10, 2011, former Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, Tom Delay, was sentenced to three years in jail for his participation in a money laundering conspiracy. Now, his attorney blames the Tea Party, in part, for his conviction.

(snip)

DeLay's attorney, Dick DeGuerin, explained the Tea Party connection by saying, "We went to trial on the very day people across the country, voters, rebelled against politics." While DeLay presumably does not differ much ideologically from the Tea Party, their inconveniently timed uprising might have irritated liberal jury members, who took their wrath out on Delay.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: teapart; tomdelay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan

Why do people think they have to defend this man just because there’s an (R) next to his name? He is crooked political scum, the ultimate in career politician. There is nothing conservative about him whatsoever!


41 posted on 01/13/2011 2:55:12 PM PST by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

When this took place there were no laws and it was common practice in BOTH parties. It took EIGHT grand juries to get an indictment.


42 posted on 01/13/2011 2:55:29 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
liberal prosecutor went after him on a technicality in the law

I thought that when this took place there WAS no law and BOTH parties transferred funds this way.

43 posted on 01/13/2011 2:57:02 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Gotcha. Thanks.


44 posted on 01/13/2011 2:57:36 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Was the jury not a representative group of DeLay's peers? Not enough whores, criminals, and lying cheats in the jury pool?

I didn't opine about Mr. Delay. I certainly don't share you venom for him though. I do assume his attorney will offer the most aggressive defense available to him though.

And no, I don't consider a murder of 0bozo zombies to be a jury of his peers.

45 posted on 01/13/2011 2:58:36 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Domalais

I haven’t read any defense of Delay’s actual crime on this thread. Most agree he that committed a crime. What people take issue with are the prosecutor’s and judge’s motives and the jail sentence.


46 posted on 01/13/2011 2:58:36 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: donna

Amen. DeLay and Fat Hastert along with GWB were able to push through more big govt BS than I care to remember. For that, I would approve of DeLay’s sentence not for campaign contributions he raised in his PAC.


47 posted on 01/13/2011 2:59:23 PM PST by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Last night my cats had a fight, I forgot and left the backyard faucet running this morning and at lunchtime I spilled some corn - obviously the teaparty caused ALL of this.


48 posted on 01/13/2011 3:01:36 PM PST by sanjoaquinvalley (Longtime Lady Lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’ve read a lot of defense of him in other threads. Mostly it has to do with “Well, Rangel didn’t go to jail so Delay shouldn’t go to jail.”

Of course, these same people will then go into yet other threads and proclaim that relative morality is a liberal falsehood.


49 posted on 01/13/2011 3:02:00 PM PST by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
This jury was right.

Maybe it was. Juries usually do the right thing inspite of the lawyers (I include the Judge in that too). I have not looked into the case. I just recall that the Prosecutor forum shopped the case.

50 posted on 01/13/2011 3:02:16 PM PST by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Why not blame this travesty of perverted justice on "anthropomorphic climate change," and make the Tea Party responsible for that, too. All that "heated rhetoric," etc.

This guy might mean well, but he probably needs to just shut up and file his appeal. This crap should never have gone to trial, and it's time for some Profiles in Courage. If Perry wants to even be considered for higher office, he had better be ready with a full pardon.

51 posted on 01/13/2011 3:04:24 PM PST by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Which perversely enough ought to make the left like the Partiers a little bit better. They really didn’t like the little guy all that much.


52 posted on 01/13/2011 3:06:54 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
"Somebody put a surveyor symbol on me."


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

53 posted on 01/13/2011 3:09:28 PM PST by The Comedian (Sarah Palin: America's last, best hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dools0007world
I’d do is fire the lawyer and disown the Tea Party disparagement.

I don't think that's what the lawyer said or meant. Travis County is packed with liberals, which is why the prosecution chose that venue. Liberal jurors were looking for payback BECAUSE of the success of the TEA Party. So they hammered the hammer. DeLay's lawyer is probably right on the jury psychology. To say so is not a criticism of the TEA Party.

54 posted on 01/13/2011 3:09:45 PM PST by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

No wonder Tom’s is going to prison.

Look what he chose to represent him.


55 posted on 01/13/2011 3:12:08 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Sorry, I disagree. It’s not like the liberal jury needed any Tea Party activity to stir up their hatred - it’s in their nature. I think it was unnecessary to bring the Tea Party into it.


56 posted on 01/13/2011 3:18:46 PM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

When this took place there were no laws and it was common practice in BOTH parties. It took EIGHT grand juries to get an indictment.


There were three Grand Juries as I understand it not eight. The Texas Criminal Statutes that DeLay was indicted under have been on the books in Texas for a long time and the ban against corporate money to state office holders goes back to 1905. Granted the two indictments using the Criminal Statues was a very unique application of those statutes, and as I understand it the first of its kind in Texas and may very well be reversed on appeal.

The indictment using the Election Code was thrown out by Judge Priest back in 2005 thus DeLay never went to trial on that count.


57 posted on 01/13/2011 3:33:12 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thank you for the information!


58 posted on 01/13/2011 3:35:19 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
What I find the hardest to understand is that out of twelve people on the jury, six women and six men that not one was fighting for not guilty. It was an unanimous verdict and you'd think one juror would have held out if the crime didn't meet the test as they understood the law, evidence. That said I think there maybe a good chance this verdict will be reversed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The Judge even said as much himself.
59 posted on 01/13/2011 3:38:19 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Was this cry baby liar not allowed to vet each jury member? If so, he’s a dumbass.


60 posted on 01/13/2011 3:47:01 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson