Now all we have to do is get hold of the devil by one of his feet
Posted on 01/09/2011 9:37:25 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike
-New Analysis of Democrat Party's Official 2008 Certification of Nomination documents for Obama reveals post-dated alterations not only in the legal content but also possible falsification of the stated time each were submitted to Chief Elections Officer.-
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Lol, RS. You tricked me into reading part of a post I’d otherwise have ignored, but that’s okay. In the context of your commentary, I enjoyed it. :)
“Three problems with the above: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama” are listed as parents on the birth notices for Barry that appeared in the Honolulu newspapers on August 13 and August 14, 1961.”
Barak H. Obama was the name of the man who came to Hawaii from Kenya. There is not notice with the name Barry in the Honolulu newspapers.
Lets keep this simple. Obama does not have a citizen father..this alone precludes him being a natural born citizen according to the Law of Nations.
The US Supreme Court as recent as 2003 said the “Law of Nations has been law in the last 200 years.”
Many trolls on the eligibility issue..they are not being honest...it is their duty to be deceptive.
If Obama was a natural born citizen they would not be here.
There would no need to be. Obama is afraid of freerepublic...we are his nightmare..so he dispatches his trolls to this site.
You are correct. FR and the knowledgeable reserachers and commenters are heroes.
Here are some original sources for further work:
See http://www.scribd.com/doc/46145949/US-President-Eligibility See
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21382712/Isnt-the-Birther-Movement-Really-About-Racism
http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/kenyan-assy-rec-born-in-kenya-2010-03-25-pg31.jpg
http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/kenyan-assy-rec-son-of-soil-2008-11-05-pg3275.jpg
http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/images/kenyan-born-npr-page.jpg http://oilforimmigration.org/images/screencapt3.jpg
http://www.nigerianobservernews.com/4112008/4112008/news/news1.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29518203/Timeline-Obama-Kenya-Possibility
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/NordykeTwinsBirthcertificate.jpg
http://constitutionallyspeaking.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/m1139416728.gif
http://www.wnd.com/images/090728nordyke.jpg
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/dailypix/2008/Dec/22/hawaii812220320V2_b.jpg
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2008/Dec/22/ln/hawaii812220320.html
Could not get them to go clickable: help !
John Boehner just said: “Hawai’i says that the president was born there. That’s good enough for me.”
Just show us the papers ...
Someone’s hearsay say-so is no longer good enough.
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/gaping-holes-in-obamas-bio-remain.html
Gaping Holes In Obama’s Bio Remain Anemic Story For Big Media
Overall, the media remains pathetic, however, Fox and MSNBC actually share a miraculous moment when their primetime competitors both admit Obama has never released his original 1961 natal documentation.
by Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
New York, NY - After nearly four years of weakening attempts to dismiss the subject, the media’s coverage of the actual details and essential questions about Obama’s legitimacy to be President remains pathetically wanton on every news network and publication in the world.
On its December 30, 2010 broadcast of “America Live”, Fox News, the self proclaimed “fair and balanced” network, with the help of legal maven Megan Kelly, tried, futilely, once again, to present the reality about the gaping voids in Barack Obama’s ambiguously documented biography. Fox may have a trademark claim on equilibrium but the network is vastly inaccurate when it comes to this subject.
Credit to Fox, although Kelly piggy-backed an excuse to talk about the mythology of Obama’s legitimacy on the lead-in that newly elected Hawaiian Democratic Governor, Neil Abercrombie, claims that he is currently working with the Hawaiian Attorney General to determine if there are legal channels which could allow him to release more original, biographical information about Barack Obama and, as Abercrombie says, “…put an end to the offensive claims of birthers.” Fox did talk about it.
Miracle number one!
While Kelly fumbled through the clumsy dialogue with her two guests, Fox’s ugly, evil cousin network from the other side of the tracks, MSNBC, made a fool of itself a few days earlier during its December 27th broadcast of “Hardball” when Chris “Leg Tingle” Matthews interviewed two southpaw guests, Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page, and Mother Jones bureau chief David Corn.
MSNBC is so biased for Obama it can no longer discern between news reporting and propaganda.
See videos here:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4478615/will-birther-debate-end
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baH0fi2oVHs
If Fox’s indifference hasn’t been bad enough, MSNBC has taken a position on the other extreme of super-bias in favor of Obama’s secrecy…with an equal degree of inaccuracy. Matthews’ opening introduction indicates the myopic perspective poisoning MSNBC’s capacity for objectivity. While displaying a copy of an image of what appears to be a photo static version of an original, standard U.S. “Certificate of Live Birth” (probably one of two containing information about the Nordyke twins posted last year), Matthews said, “This is an actual birth certificate, the long-form Certificate of Live Birth in the State of Hawaii...”
Miracle number two!
This is the very first time anyone at MSNBC has ever broadcast its endorsement of this 110 year old document format! For the first time in more than four years of unacknowledged reality, MSNBC admitted the single most important fact about Obama’s natal documentation!
However, don’t expect the ultra-liberal delusional minions to be cured in one shrink session. Matthews, then held up a copy of an image of an independently published, post-2000, Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, (the document commonly associated with Obama), continued, “...this, on the other hand, is what they release, generally, to the public, a ‘thinner’ form...I’m not sure if it has less information, but it is digital, of course it doesn’t have signatures on it, and to the ‘birthers’, is evidence he really ain’t one of us!”
Also, just so Matthews knows we all are aware of his passive aggressive, snarky comment, no one has ever said that Obama’s lack of standard, original documentation means that ‘he ain’t one of us’. It just means his legitimacy to be president has not been clarified based on the evidence. Apparently, according to MSNBC and Matthews, everyone not automatically qualified to be the U.S. President is a victim of racism. If Matthews had his way, America could be led by genocidal fascists as long as they were not white.
Matthews ignorance about the Constitution is so absurd, its laughable.
That leg tingle is fading for Matthews. He’s had more fun at the dentist. Even while the reality of the disparity between these two massively different documents is being held in his very hands, he still had difficulty accepting the facts.
“I’m not sure if it has less information..”??!! Is Matthews serious? Look at the document content, man! Can he count? He is so blinded by his leftist delusion, he still is unable to behold the painful truth, even while holding it in his own hand.
While main street conservatives push the essential questions about Obama’s deception, the San Fransicko-liberal establishment has mounted a ridiculous mock-fest at anyone with any question doubting Obama’s suspiciously vacant past. The true evil in both sides of this derision is the claim that the facts are already known. They are not. Anyone who says so is a liar.
Fox and MSNBC are two sides of the same coin. Their viewers may be diametrically opposed, ideologically, but they both need to make sure their proximity to the Obama administration remains legitimate in order for them to remain legitimate. Ironically, what drives the media’s inability to objectively address the facts about Obama’s documentation is the unknown risk the subject’s revelations have on their access to government.
If Obama is found illegitimate or ineligible, all the debates about his policies can no longer be framed within the viability of legitimacy. If Fox and MSNBC are ever forced to embrace the reasons for Obama’s covert identity, they are afraid it will remove their capacity for sustainable ideologically oriented debate. If Obama is found to be a usurper, his politics no longer matter…and therefore, Fox and MSNBC no longer matter.
Recall, just eight years ago, as the Bush administration presented its original documentation, for its legal case for war against Saddam Hussein to the U.N., presenting slide shows, illustrations and testimony about the threat of Saddam’s weapons-of-mass-destruction, liberal network and cable media failed then to mete out the applicable facts of that drama. Many maintain, even today, that Bush’s decision to depose Hussein was never based on legitimate evidence, even though it was an undeniable fact that Saddam Hussein had violated 17 U.N. security council resolutions regarding it’s lack of disclosure about his possession, or not, of WMD’s. The inconvenient fact that Saddam had actually used nerve gas against northern Kurds in Halabja in 1988 seemed to remain a hidden truth among biased media drones. Some liberal pundits actually said that since Saddam only used WMDs inside the borders of Iraq, he was not a threat to the world.
Of course, Bush had a legal right based on U.N. resolutions, but did he have the credibility of legitimate documentation to support his argument that Saddam was behind the attacks of 9-11? Likewise, of course, if you ask any lawyer,Obama has a legal standing based on Hawaiian municipal laws to release a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, but does he have the credibility to ensure that a lack of the original, legitimate documentation should be excused while he lays claims that he is a legitimate president?
Why did the media not report these facts supporting the legal reasons Bush cited for invading Hussein? For the same reason it refuses to report the facts about Obama’s biographic information. Because it doesn’t benefit the media milkers to butcher their cash cow.
Just as the medical industry understands there is no profit in curing a disease in lieu of extended treatment, the media understands there is no money in revealing the truth in lieu of exploiting a mystery. Voracity for controversy drives the media’s choice to avoid investigating the truth about Obama and, instead, justifies the daily dosage of avoidance as long as the deception can survive.
As long as the media is able to exploit vague information to make Obama look like a mere symptom of change rather than investigating evidence that he is the carrier of a disease destroying our sovereignty, it can continue to milk the Obama cow many times instead of butchering it all at once.
The dilema facing Obama, however, is that America is a severely lactose intolerant carnivore.
For example, the media has profited much from the narrative that the 2008 election of the first “black” president was a positive sign of a progressing society. The media adopted this liberal message without ever looking at the probable corruption and possible criminal activity in that President’s past. There is a lot of smoke, and fire, in that investigation.
Therefore, in defense of itself, American society was forced to fill the gaping orifice that used to be responsible journalism with unified national movements like the Tea Party, concerned with government spending and taxation, and the so-called “birthers”, concerned with the lack of standard records and Constitutional legitimacy of the Obama administration.
These unification movements are not irrational. In fact, they are the natural consequence when government threatens inalienable rights; particularly the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment and the 10th Amendment.
Without the media protecting the people, holding their government accountable, the people had to prepare itself for the possibility that the election of Obama was actually the usurpation of power by an illegitimate rogue, radical, communist, puppet-leader acting in coordination with an international and domestic leftist agenda to undermine the stronghold of longstanding, vintage American exceptionalism by redistributing white, judeo-christian wealth toward the ultimate goal of global economic justice.
There is no longer any doubt that Fox and MSNBC have hindered a resolution to the controversy over Obama’s undocumented identity. However, it was joyous to see them agree with the American public for once.
Let’s make something very clear. Those who denounce Obama’s credibility based on his lack of biographical transparency are not claiming, specifically, that he was not born in Hawaii. They are protesting the covert treatment of what are considered common documentation, which every other American must present for reasons far less significant than being the President, demonsrating that he was indeed born under the geographic, biographic and demographic circumstances he has claimed.
For monetary and political reasons, Obama’s natal biography has become a part of some weird media black-out. Reporters and pundits all look like scared little kids waiting for some guidance from Obamaland. In fact, the majority of people questioning Obama’s identity actually believe he was born in Hawaii. However, the media is not willing to accept the fact that his birth place is not what people are concerned about. The primary concerns about Obama exist because he was not thoroughly vetted, his records remain hidden and he has simply not been honest in his disclosure about is biographical information.
However, Kelly on Fox, and Matthews on MSNBC did get one fact right for the first time in the last four years of evasion. They both finally admitted that Obama has yet to produce a standard U.S. 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, which is the only document available to natural-born citizens of the U.S.
At one point, Kelly said, “Abercrombie is going to try to do more to release an actual, tangible birth certificate…which has yet to be produced.”
Chris Matthews likewise nearly choked during his show in saying, “Why has the president himself not demanded that they put out the initial documents (an original 1961 birth certificate)?”
Stanley and O Sr must have married at some point; there’s a divorce, and I don’t see how you get one of those without a marriage. No wonder we’re not allowed to see the original marriage certificate, however; it would reveal the marriage succeeded the birth, which is a fact BO doesn’t want to publicize.
Oddly, no proof of Marriage is needed to get a “divorce”; just a statement by Dunham.
Just show us the papers ...
Someone’s hearsay say-so is no longer good enough.
Eyewitness testimony isn’t hearsay and officials of the former gubernatorial administration in Hawaii have personally seen the document in the records of the Department of Health and can sign depositions and testify to those facts in any court of law in America or before any legislative committee of a state or the federal government.
Barak H. Obama was the name of the man who came to Hawaii from Kenya. There is not notice with the name Barry in the Honolulu newspapers.
Lets keep this simple. Obama does not have a citizen father..this alone precludes him being a natural born citizen according to the Law of Nations.
The US Supreme Court as recent as 2003 said the “Law of Nations has been law in the last 200 years.”
“Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes REGARDLESS OF THE CITIZENSHIP OF THEIR PARENTS.”
Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana, November 12, 2009
US CODE OF LAWS: TITLE 8, CHAPTER 12, SUBCHAPTER III, Part I, Section 1401. “Nationals and citizens of United States at birth:”
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
A Swiss law book has no force of law in the United States of America. You see, in America, we are perfectly capable of writing our own laws and don’t need to depend on non-citizens like Emer deVattel to do it for us.
Thank you for that information re: divorce, and the fact that a prior marriage is not a prerequisite. That is very fascinating, and certainly sheds light on what on/about Obama’s BC might be so ‘embarrassing’. Hmm. Obama lies so pathologically, it’s hard to figure out the truth in all this. He said his ‘parents’ married prior to his birth, but Michelle said his mother was still ‘very single’ when he was born. I’m going with Michelle on this one, and my guess is that the info on the BC is far more ‘embarrassing’ than we can even imagine.
Interestingly, the trolls have been going wild lately. In fact, it seems that since LTC Lakin’s judge mentioned the ‘embarrassment’ connected to Obama’s BC, the trolls have lost their marbles. Their increased rudeness, aggressiveness and irrationality bodes well for our side; the BC matter is slowly yet inexorably coming to a head.
I think, to be perfectly blunt, the trolls had been operating on the assumption that Little Barry [to borrow O’s good friend Abercrombie’s designation] had a perfectly intact BC that revealed nothing damaging. Now they’re suffering severe cognitive dissonance, since in the fevered world of Obotism the BC is still hunky dory, while in the real world Lakin’s judge has blown that sad delusion to kingdom come.
Next up: exploding heads amongst trolls and on the left—take it to the bank.
Thanks
Amazing Birth Certificate Information #1: “I happen to be Kenyan. I was born 1 month before Obama at Mombasa medical center. I am a teacher here at the MM Shaw Primary School in Kenya. I compared my birth certificate to the one that has been put on by Taitz and mine is exactly the same.”
Letter from Kitau in Mombasa, Kenya:
I happen to be Kenyan. I was born 1 month before Obama at Mombasa medical center. I am a teacher here at the MM Shaw Primary School in Kenya. I compared my birth certificate to the one that has been put on by Taitz and mine is exactly the same.
I even have the same registrar and format. The type is identical.
I am by nature a skeptical person. I teach science here and challenge most things that cannot be proven.
So I went to an official registrar today and pulled up the picture on the web. They magnified it and determined it to be authentic. There is even a plaque with Registrar Lavenders name on it as he was a Brit and was in charge of the Registrar office from 1959 until January of 1964.
The reason the date on the certificate says republic of Kenya is that we were a republic when the “copy” of the original was ordered. I stress the word “copy”. My copy also has republic of Kenya.
So what you say is true about Kenya not being a republic at the time of Obama’s birth, however it was a republic when the copy was ordered.
The birth certificate is genuine. I assure you it will be authenticated by a forensic auditor. We are very proud Obama was born here.
We have a shrine for him and there are many people who remember his birth here as he had a white mother. They are being interviewed now by one of your media outlets.
Fortunately they even have pictures of his parents with him immediately after his birth at the Mombasa hospital with the hospital in the back ground.
It will be a proud day for us when it is proven that he was born here and a Kenyan became the most powerful man in the world.
I encourage anyone to come here and visit. I will be happy to take you and show you the pictures at the hospital myself as well as my document and many others that are identical to what Taitz posted.
God Bless.
Kitau
http://www.thepowerhour.com/news4/obama_kenyan_birth_certificate.htm
http://write2fight.wordpress.com
Amazing Birth Certificate Information #2: Grandmother of President Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. reveals below the story of his birth in Mombasa, Kenya, a seaport, after his mother suffered labor pains while swimming at ocean beach in Mombasa
Grandmother of President Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. reveals below the story of his birth in Mombasa, Kenya, a seaport, after his mother suffered labor pains while swimming at ocean beach in Mombasa .
“On August 4, 1961 Obama’s mother, father and grandmother were attending a Muslim festival in Mombassa, Kenya. Mother had been refused entry to airplanes due to her 9 month pregnancy. It was a hot August day at the festival so the Obama’s went to the beach to cool off. While swimming in the ocean his mother experienced labor pains so was rushed to the Coast Provincial General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya where Obama was born a few hours later at 7:21 pm on August 4, 1961. Four days later his mother flew to Hawaii and registered his birth in Honolulu as a certificate of live birth which omitted the place and hospital of birth.”
The local Imam in Mombasa named Barack with his middle name Hussein so his official name on his certificate of live birth below is Barack Hussein Obama, II.
Barack Hussein Obama is the first U.S. president born in Africa at the Coast Provincial Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya. The Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth below is a forgery and of no value.
See this Alan Keyes video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmujttc0oJc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxec1mjZwYg
Amazing Birth Certificate Information #3: “I asked a British history buff I know if he could find out who the colonial registrar was for Mombasa in 1961. He called me up a few minutes ago and said “Sir Edward F. Lavender” Source(s): “ Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library.””
“I asked a British history buff I know if he could find out who the colonial registrar wasfor Mombasa in 1961.
He called me up a few minutes ago and said “Sir Edward F. Lavender”
Source(s): “ Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library.”
Posted by Alan Peters at 11:56 PM
In Amazing Birth Certificate Information #2, read:
Testimony from a Mombasa science teacher and the Mombasa Registrar of births that Obama’s birth certificate from Mombasa is genuine. A copy of President Obama’s birth certificate that Lucas Smith obtained through the help of a Kenyan Colonel who got it recently directly from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
http://state-of-the-nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/birth2.jpg
Now if we can just load up a White House bathmat with ink and compare it to that footprint at a magnification of 200 power...
Great idea.
Shouldn’t be too hard or too expensive.
Don’t we have any billionaires on our side?
Seems they have hundreds.
Oh Wait. Can I say that?
Thanks for that information, which I had not seen before. Let me put it this way. If it were to Obama’s advantage to be born in Mombasa, the Obots would be vigorously, vociferously, and even obnoxiously, arguing that the Mombasa BC is legitimate. I have lost all respect for them because they repeat memes that have been refuted a hundred times, and they show no regard for the truth whatsoever. On the other side—our side—are people engaged in a relentless search for the truth. If this Mombasa BC is legitimate, that fact will eventually be established, of that you can be sure.
In the meantime, we will stay on this issue like the hounds of hell. The truth of Obama’s birth will come out—and I’m betting it happens sooner than later.
Note to lurking leftist trolls and Dems re: post 152. ‘Exploding heads’ is an internet term referring to what happens when people of limited intellect or lacking in critical thinking skills encounter a fact that destroys the assumptions upon which their world view rests. Iow, it has nothing to do with violence or inflammatory rhetoric.
::rolls eyes:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.