Think That Exhaust Trail Was From a Plane? Farah's Report Says Differently

Here's The Right Side Of It ^ | November 20, 2010 | John L. Work

[JLWORK]

The powers that be, they who control what news information we get, must think we are even more stupid than I previously believed they do. I’m referring to the state-controlled big media and Pentagon cover-up of the source of the recent exhaust trail in the sky off the coast of California – the one that was filmed by KCBS television personnel.

Joseph Farah of World Net Daily published a pretty darned credible story last night, backed up by former military experts, suggesting that the source of the trail was a Chinese missile fired from a submarine. Worse, experts who should know how this kind of incident is handled are of the opinion that the insipid, insulting explanation we’ve been spoon-fed came directly from the Commander In Chief, himself, (photo above). Here’s a link to Farah’s Copyrighted story, which includes an interesting four minute and eighteen second video:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=230425

I’m no expert. But in sixty-three years I’ve seen a lot of jet vapor trials, com-trails, exhaust trails, or whatever you want to call them from airplanes. This one looks like what I saw years ago as a kid in Southern California – that resulted from missile launches from Vandenberg Air Force Base.

Rush Limbaugh has said more than once that elections have consequences. I cannot help wondering how much worse things will get with this man in Office.

[Frantzie]

Oh careful that anti-birther Romney-bot woman will come around and bash World Net Daily.

[trumandogz]

Is Joe Farah sure it was not a Pterodactyl that had bad gas?

[muawiyah]

Now that we know that the original video was cut and edited to lead you to an erroneous viewpoint, let me ask why Joseph Farah is so easily misled by CBS propaganda?

Has he lost his touch?

Frankly, it was a plane, and with all the various segments seen in the correct order as they were originally filmed, it's pretty clearly NOT A ROCKET.

[bboop]

I thot it looked like a Vandenberg shot too.

[AlexW]

“I’m no expert. But in sixty-three years I’ve seen a lot of jet vapor trials, com-trails....”

I also do not think it looks like a contrail.
The Kook to Kookers, however, will tell you that it is a Chemtrail, haha. They think all streaks in the sky are from evil govmit, trying to poison us.

I have seen only the one photo, and it appears to be going up and arching.

[cripplecreek]

I still want to know why our government didn’t do the easy thing and simply say it was one of ours and be done with it.

Its almost as if someone wanted a conspiracy theory.

[xkaydet65]

have you seen the original vid? If so can you direct me to a site tht has it? Thanx

[muawiyah]

Another Freeper who has the requisite skills, home super computer/video editor, and software managed to examine the videos (there are two versions BTW) and find the edit marks ~ then reconstruct it. You should try here to see what he found: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2630024/posts

[Chode]

am i to believe that there is not ONE SINGLE RADAR pointed west that would confirm the track as horizontal at altitude or vertical from the surface???

NOT ONE???

good thing it wasn't pointed inland or the first notice would be when it hit...

[Keith in Iowa]

Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
	11/20/2010 12:48:03 PM PST · by editor-surveyor · 134 replies WND ^ | November 20, 2010 | Joseph Farah Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near...
Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
	11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Staff Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are...
Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
	11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Staff Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are...
Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
	11/19/2010 5:19:18 PM PST · by conservativegramma · 243 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Joseph Farah 'Muted response' was decision 'made by the president himself' Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious...

[samtheman]

There have been at least several lengthy technical pieces posted on the internet (and here in FR) making the case that this was just an airplane, and even naming the plane (some air cargo plane).

The posted piece here, from WND, doesn’t even try to refute those technical pro-plane arguments. It just makes assertions.

Though I would be the first to believe (in general) that Obambi is a friggin’ liar and that the Chinese have pulled the wool over his eyes (who couldn’t?)... the details of THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT seem to favor those who actually post technical arguments. I haven’t seen a single technical argument posted that argues for this being a missile. They post different “experts” who say it “must” be a missile... but they don’t say why.

Show me the missile argument... in detail. I want to see the details.

The people who make the “it’s a plane” argument are backing it up with details... not appeals to authority.

Again, I am very willing to believe (in general) that Obambi is the world’s biggest freaking liar (and most evil human alive... no kidding)... but in this PARTICULAR case... SHOW ME THE DETAILS!

[Finny]

Yeah, but look on the bright side. UPS has a great video clip for a fabulous new marketing campaign:

"That's not a missile, that's UPS!" What's Brown done for you today?

[^ )

[Tex-Con-Man]

Which do you want...WND or facts? ...cause you can't have both.

[Thrownatbirth]

Folks at SUBPAC all seem to be capitated.

[Bernard Marx]

The people who make the “it’s a plane” argument are backing it up with details... not appeals to authority.

I'll try to make this an appeal to logic. I live directly under the path of the purported "missile" and the landing approach to Pt. Mugu Naval Air Station.

I see many similar aircraft contrails daily. The CBS video distorted the contrail's perspective. It was headed inland to Phoenix and was traveling horizontally at high altitude.

Believe me -- if a foreign vessel of any kind had launched a missile in that area I'd have had to wear earplugs to dampen the noise of all the fighter-bomber sorties in and out of Mugu! As it happened it was an especially quiet night in that respect.

I've seen perhaps 20 missile launches from V-berg over the years. I admit I thought this contrail was missile exhaust at first. But when I figured out the inland-bound perspective I quickly realized it was an optical illusion. But I don't expect the True Believers to change their thinking. We have a new Roswell Myth a-making. Jesse Ventura's probably already on it like white on rice.

[TChad]

am i to believe that there is not ONE SINGLE RADAR pointed west that would confirm the track as horizontal at altitude or vertical from the surface???

Freepers are not permitted to mention the R word in these threads. It spoils the fun.

[TigersEye]

New footage of 'Mystery Missile' :: Nov 8, 2010, Off Southern California Coast

[samtheman]

Good post. Good points.

[samtheman]

You’re right about WND, in general.