Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2010 7:13:16 PM PST by JLWORK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JLWORK

Oh careful that anti-birther Romney-bot woman will come around and bash World Net Daily.


2 posted on 11/20/2010 7:17:56 PM PST by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

Is Joe Farah sure it was not a Pterodactyl that had bad gas?


3 posted on 11/20/2010 7:18:10 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

I thot it looked like a Vandenberg shot too.


5 posted on 11/20/2010 7:25:26 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

“I’m no expert. But in sixty-three years I’ve seen a lot of jet vapor trials, com-trails....”

I also do not think it looks like a contrail.
The Kook to Kookers, however, will tell you that it is a Chemtrail, haha. They think all streaks in the sky are from evil govmit, trying to poison us.

I have seen only the one photo, and it appears to be going up and arching.


6 posted on 11/20/2010 7:29:12 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
am i to believe that there is not ONE SINGLE RADAR pointed west that would confirm the track as horizontal at altitude or vertical from the surface???

NOT ONE???

good thing it wasn't pointed inland or the first notice would be when it hit...

10 posted on 11/20/2010 7:56:46 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
 
11/20/2010 12:48:03 PM PST · by editor-surveyor · 134 replies
WND ^ | November 20, 2010 | Joseph Farah
Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near...
 

Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
 
11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies
World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Staff
Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are...
 

Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
 
11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies
World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Staff
Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are...
 

Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
 
11/19/2010 5:19:18 PM PST · by conservativegramma · 243 replies
World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Joseph Farah
'Muted response' was decision 'made by the president himself' Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious...

11 posted on 11/20/2010 7:57:47 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

There have been at least several lengthy technical pieces posted on the internet (and here in FR) making the case that this was just an airplane, and even naming the plane (some air cargo plane).

The posted piece here, from WND, doesn’t even try to refute those technical pro-plane arguments. It just makes assertions.

Though I would be the first to believe (in general) that Obambi is a friggin’ liar and that the Chinese have pulled the wool over his eyes (who couldn’t?)... the details of THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT seem to favor those who actually post technical arguments. I haven’t seen a single technical argument posted that argues for this being a missile. They post different “experts” who say it “must” be a missile... but they don’t say why.

Show me the missile argument... in detail. I want to see the details.

The people who make the “it’s a plane” argument are backing it up with details... not appeals to authority.

Again, I am very willing to believe (in general) that Obambi is the world’s biggest freaking liar (and most evil human alive... no kidding)... but in this PARTICULAR case... SHOW ME THE DETAILS!


12 posted on 11/20/2010 7:59:38 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
Yeah, but look on the bright side. UPS has a great video clip for a fabulous new marketing campaign:

"That's not a missile, that's UPS!" What's Brown done for you today?

[^ )

13 posted on 11/20/2010 8:09:30 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

Folks at SUBPAC all seem to be capitated.


15 posted on 11/20/2010 8:23:56 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
New footage of 'Mystery Missile' :: Nov 8, 2010, Off Southern California Coast
18 posted on 11/20/2010 8:27:40 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

The frequent assertions by WND don’t seem to have merit. It is very likely that Chinese missiles can leave a signature exhaust/vapor trial. But WND offers no expert analysis from an indentifiable source or for that matter verifiable radar tracking for the frequent postings appearing in FRs.

It’s an entertaining hoax driving FRs nutz and I’m laughing my phisteris off at the many speculations offered in these sundry postings. But would be very happy to change my mind if they come up with some solid stuff.


21 posted on 11/20/2010 8:37:41 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("To punish a province Let it be ruled by a professor " Frederick The Great paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

There are TWO missile trails. The news reporter says the one his crew filmed was “just like” the one they saw the previous day! They didn’t film the first one.


22 posted on 11/20/2010 8:39:11 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
Well, I can see that Zero would want to cover up a Chinese missile launch 35 miles off the coast.

But I can't see - because it would be impossible - to cover up the NORAD, USN, and ATC activity that would have happened immediately, long before Zero (who was in Indonesia) could have issued orders to do so.

Unless you believe that we would not have gone to DEFCON 1 without orders, automatically, in response to such an event, how can you believe in a coverup?

I mean, there's been a system in place for 45 years to respond to a missile breaking the surface off the coast. Where was it?

25 posted on 11/20/2010 8:44:11 PM PST by Jim Noble (It's the tyranny, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK
What, China decides to attack the west coast using boat based missiles, and only brought one with them...?

We will all be in a world of crap when that boat returns next week with another one.

Who can say, this one might even hit the frikin continent.

26 posted on 11/20/2010 8:45:50 PM PST by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

I said from the beginning tha it was a Chinese missile.


40 posted on 11/20/2010 9:59:27 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLWORK

It was a joint Chinese/American missile attack, launched from San Nicolas Island. The original target was the UPS flight 902, which was carrying gold bullion and US treasury bills.

But here’s the conspiracy — the gold bullion wasn’t really worth that much, because it wasn’t real; it was simply gold-plated blanks.

The U.S. treasury bills weren’t worth much either. Oh, they were real — they simply aren’t worth that much. So the plan was to blow up the plane so people wouldn’t know that China and the US had been selling Gold paper units secretly on the market, without owning the gold; and US treasuries without having any money.

By using a Chinese missile, the US would have plausible deniability; by launching from a US base, the Chinese could also claim innocence.

However, here’s where the plan went awry. Just as the missile was being launched, Rahm Emmanuel found out that a conniving reporter had managed to get a copy of Barack’s actual birth certificate — the one proving he was actually born not in Hawaii, but in American Samoa. That reporter was transporting the document back on Flight 808. So Obama called up the top brass at San Nicolas and told them to re-target the weapon for the commercial aircraft.

Unbenownst to them, flight 808 had been delayed at takeoff, because the pilot had been stuck in the new TSA screening procedure; complaining about x-rays, he was picked for “special pat-down”. However, it turns out he was a transsexual transgendered lesbian, and it took quite some time for TSA to find an appropriate gender-match to perform his “servicing”.

So they mis-directed the missile, it missed it’s target.

Needless to say, this has been quite the embarrassment. We know this is exactly what happened because, in addition to the incontrovertable 40-mile zoom edited shaky helicopter video, we also know that the FAA detected nothing, nobody heard anything, nobody saw the launch, no soldiers reported anything, no pilots saw the missile, the military denies it, and satellite images show a normal airplane contrail.

There is no way that so many people could be manipulated to say nothing happened, unless the missile launch was directed from the highest parts of government.


42 posted on 11/20/2010 10:02:55 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson