Posted on 11/20/2010 12:48:03 PM PST by editor-surveyor
Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast and recorded by a KCBS television crew came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near Los Angeles did not come from a jet but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.
They further suggest the missile was fired from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine off America's coast, and point out that the timing of the alleged Chinese missile shot coincided with an increasing confrontation between the U.S. and China, and was likely meant to send a message to Washington.
Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
"Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8."
I don’t know, there was a flight during that time to hawaii and quite frankly anything from WND is suspect. That ads alone on that site scream wingnut.
I’ll wait for more evidence.
Is that all?
I was convinced it was Ala coming to chat with the POTUS.
On to the CIA animation and a year's effort by the FBI's Kalstrom.
Just yesterday there were several who expressed their "Derangement Syndrome" against Beck for his having commented on practically the same thing: his having received information from some reliable sources which hold the same belief.
And no I'm not a Beck-ite (or whatever one would refer to a person who watches him constantly and agrees with everything he espouses) but let's face it you "supposed" conservatives, he HAS done MUCH to advance our cause, so how's about you save your hateful remarks for those on the Dark Side, i.e. Demo-Rats, Libs, Progs and Commies....all one-in-the-same!
The certified Wingnuts are convinced that “WND is suspect.”
Please support the Ostritch Syndrome Association; someday there’ll be a cure!
.
I don’t know much about contrails or missile launches, but why would the Chinese compromise a first strike weapon as a show of force? Once that “missile” went live, we could have collected a lot of intelligence about the launch vehicle, platform, etc. It almost seems frivolous. It really doesn’t seem like their style. Would you really want to give an enemy that much information by showing off?
If it was airliner, where is the match to flight number Ha?
The contrail examples (in ones showing motion, not the static photos that prove little) can’t be dismissed out of hand but, as I’ve posted earlier, if you had to commission a study of how the Chinese could “fire a shot across our bow” this SLBM scenario is almost certainly what a Tom Clancy would write.
It was out there the next day -- a Hono/Phoenix flight that passes Los Angeles daily at that time; another chopper shot an eerily similar video at the same time, the next day.
These whackjob threads are an embarrassment to FR.
Amazing what you can learn from a few seconds of out-of-focus video off the Internet.
How would they know it was Chinese? Did they hear a gong?
>How would they know it was Chinese?<
They were hungry an hour later.
“Ala coming to chat with the POTUS”
in the name of a lie.
I had the good fortune of being out of the country when this "event" happened. But, when I returned home to see what the conspiracy theorists were saying, one word came to mind. Ridiculous.
As a navy vet who has witnessed the launch of a cruise missile from a surface ship, and someone who has been a sailor my entire life, there is NO WAY that this was "launched" 30 miles from the most densely populated parts of this country with NO ONE on the ground or on the sea seeing a thing.
I don't think people realize how loud it is, nor how much of a spectacle a missile rising through the surface of the water, and quickly approaching supersonic speeds would be. Where's the sonic boom? The Chinese have successfully test-fired the slowest missile in the history of missiles?
That part of the California coast is heavily populated with recreational boaters, commercial ships and off-shore oil rigs, but not a single person has come forward to say they witnessed this "launch". It's preposterous.
When will sanity restore itself to the country?
With all that fighter piloting and rocket designing experience, are you worried that the Chinese have developed the worlds first silent ICBM. I mean, if they can ignore that physical law, what else might be up their sleeves?
I hope they don't set their phasers to kill.
An "accidental launch"? Wow, that's even better. Ignoring for a moment that it takes dozens of members of the crew to spin-up up a launch tube and its missile, how do you think one accidentally launches a missile, considering of course that the boat has to be at the precise depth to make a successful launch. I mean, you don't think that they were just motoring along, and someone "accidentally" pressed the red button, do you?
|
||
Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile |
||
11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | StaffEditor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast and recorded by a KCBS television crew came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are... |
||
|
||
Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile |
||
11/19/2010 7:53:53 PM PST · by righttackle44 · 58 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | StaffEditor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports. Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast and recorded by a KCBS television crew came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are... |
||
|
||
Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile |
||
11/19/2010 5:19:18 PM PST · by conservativegramma · 232 replies World Net Daily ^ | November 19, 2010 | Joseph Farah'Muted response' was decision 'made by the president himself' Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast and recorded by a KCBS television crew came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious... |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.