Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Papering Barry [Obots respond to "DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office"]
Canada Free Press ^ | April 24, 2010 | Judi McLeod

Posted on 04/25/2010 7:53:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Note to Obamabots: JB Williams is a full-blooded American. In point of fact, you can file him under genus: American Patriot.

When Google News ran JB’s DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office on its front page yesterday, Canada Free Press (CFP) was hit by 20,000 visitors within the first five minutes.

Hundreds of letters started pouring in using the Obamabot’s favourite one line message: “Idiot!” Being familiar with the term it was the only word they spelled correctly.

For anyone who may have been thinking that the Obamabots returned to the local pool halls after the election of their Messiah, Google proves that they are alive and seething.

Many letters accused JB of being a “dirty Canuck”. Interesting how they bandy the word “racist” about, but feel it’s okay to smear those they disagree with as a “dirty Canuck”.

“Don’t come here, Canada, you’re not welcome!” was the theme of their collective message.

JB, of course, is American and has the birth certificate to prove it. It is CFP who is the “dirty “Canuck”.

Reading all of the letters from these courageous Obamabots, like their master hiding their identities, in this case behind GMail, hotmail and Yahoo accounts, made me stop and think about the Big O’s missing education records.

You see, it’s not the controversy of his BC that troubles me, it’s that all of the straw man’s papers are locked away from public view.

Knowing he wasn’t born in a manger is about all we know for sure about the president of the most powerful nation on earth.

For all we know, little Barry Soetoro may have failed kindergarten.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; birthers; canadafreepress; certifigate; cfp; jbwilliams; judimcleod; kenyabelieveit; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But one thing we do know is that once we start accepting the missing identity of the President of the United States of America, how long is it before we let through charlatans in medicine and the military?

no onus on proof, anybody can be anybody they want to be.

Getting rid of documents is a convenient agenda in the first-the-pond-tomorrow-the-word Power Game.

Only in America can a man who doesn’t exist grow up to be President.

21 posted on 04/26/2010 8:50:20 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Just A Nobody; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Did the brief stint Obama performed as an interpreter for the CIA in Afghanistan decades later enable him to a brand new identity in the Witness Protection Program ripoff of all time?

Interpreter? Give me a break! 0b0wa doesn't master any language, including English, except teleprompter English. Case in point, corps pronounced corpse and other examples I really don't care to numerate.

Knowing a few words of a language, pronounced with a thick accent and the wrong emphasis, doesn’t make one an interpreter or a linguist. Another implied or unintended glorification for an idiot!

He might have been a CIA informer who squealed on his buddies, the radical blacks, terrorists and communists, but to glorify him as an "interpreter" is quite a stretch. IOW, 'singing" to the CIA doesn't make him the new Sinatra!

You can imagine how all these groups would react to such revelations about their messiah. I certainly wouldn’t like to be in his hoofs when it eventually happens!

........should be rebranding them as “Documentarists” rather than “Birthers”.

You got that right. This ghost of a POTUS's documents, especially education documents, should be uncovered to find out who the real 0kaka is.

This is why I consider myself a Ghoster not a Birther.

22 posted on 04/26/2010 9:38:49 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Doesn’t EVERYONE get their citizenship by statue?

If your mom and dad were American citizens and you were born in the United States, no law is needed to define your citizenship. You are a "natural born" citizen. You don't have any choices -- you're an American. You don't have a claim to being a citizen of any other country -- by birthplace or blood -- and no other country has a claim on you.

Both McCain and Obama had ties, either through their birthplace or parentage to another country. It required a "statute" to define their citizenship status.

McCain did have a choice, at some point in his life to be a Panamanian or an American, and Obama did have a choice about being a Kenyan or an American.


23 posted on 04/26/2010 9:44:03 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Re “According to your view was Barry Goldwater eligible to run for POTUS in 1964?”

Why The Republicans Are Silent On The Eligibility Issue

The Republican Party has a history of accommodating presidential candidates whose Constitutional eligibility is uncertain.

Chester Arthur — America’s first post-1787-born president, whose parents were not both U.S. citizens, was a Republican.

George Romney — ran for the Republican party nomination in 1968. He was born in Mexico.

Barry Goldwater — born (in 1909) in Phoenix, when Arizona was still territory, not yet a state.

Lowell Weicker — entered the race for the Republican party nomination of 1980 but dropped out. He was born in Paris, France.

John McCain — born in the Republic of Panama.

Bobby Jindal — a possible Republican candidate in 2012. He was born in the United States, but at the time of his birth, his parents were not U.S. citizens.

Given its history of eligibility-questionable presidential candidates, the Republican Party would be guilty of hypocrisy if it were to challenge Obama’s eligibility.

Moreover, if the Courts find that Barack Obama is ineligible, it is likely that John McCain is ineligible as well, since neither candidate was subject to sole and complete U.S. jurisdiction at the time of his birth. Should that happen, both major political parties might be required to reimburse presidential campaign financing they received from the Federal government in 2008. This would be a non-issue for the Democratic Party which accepted little, if any, Federal monies during the 2008 presidential campaign. But the McCain campaign received substantial Federal funding.

If McCain were found to be an ineligible presidential candidate, the RNC might be required to return government monies it had received in 2008 for McCain’s presidential campaign. Given the financial risk that McCain’s questionable eligibility poses, the Republican Party is likely to oppose any public discussion of McCain’s or Obama’s presidential eligibility.

http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SilentRepublicans.htm


24 posted on 04/26/2010 9:49:02 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Re: 14th Amendment:

You need to read it. The 14th Amendment is about citizenship rights. The word "eligibility" appears nowhere in the amendment, and after all, this discussion isn't about Obama's citizenship -- it's about his "eligibility" to serve as POTUS and CiC -- the citizenship issue is simply an Obot smokescreen. It allows them to confuse the issue.

Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


25 posted on 04/26/2010 10:00:45 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Re: What if Ireland decided to grant Irish citizenship to all persons who could show at least one grandparent was an Irish citizen, at birth.

Now you’re just being foolish.

No country can just decide to make you a citizen.

All four of my grandparents came from Ireland, and, yes, I can file for Irish citizenship and an Irish passport, but Ireland can’t decide on it’s own to make me an Irish citizen.


26 posted on 04/26/2010 10:05:58 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

In reference to your “The idea that you if you are born here (on American soil) you are automatically a citizen is also a statue (14th Ammendment).”

This is wrong-

Title 8 and the 14th Amendment both state; All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy fourth edition
Under Jus Soli, the following is written “The Supreme Court’s first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.” Most Indians could not meet the test. “Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102.
It continues that Congress eventually passed legislation with the ‘Allotment Act of 1887, that conferred citizenship on many Indians.

The fact remains, the Court held, complete and sole Jurisdiction. As I have held that being born anywhere in the United States, jurisdiction is required, sole and complete, and Barack Hussein Obama was already claimed by British jurisdiction under the British Nationailty Act of 1948, and as such fails the United states Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen.

So explain how “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.”

So to ‘what’ degree was Barack Hussein Obama under US Jurisdiction at birth? Knowing that he was already under British jurisdiction, and how that being only partial or to whatever degree you impose not being in conflict with “completely subject to”?

Mind you this is The Supreme Court that has stated complete and not partial to any degree jurisdiction.


27 posted on 04/26/2010 10:24:09 AM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Now you’re just being foolish.

No country can just decide to make you a citizen.

All four of my grandparents came from Ireland, and, yes, I can file for Irish citizenship and an Irish passport, but Ireland can’t decide on it’s own to make me an Irish citizen.


However the US State Department provides “guidance” for persons who were conferred automatic foreign citizenship as minors.
http://www.richw.org/dualcit/law.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode08/usc_sup_01_8_10_12_20_III.html


28 posted on 04/26/2010 10:35:47 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Doesn’t have anything to do with my post.

Are you confused?


29 posted on 04/26/2010 10:51:00 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Doesn’t have anything to do with my post.

Are you confused?


My post is about OBAMA’s eligibility and dual citizenship.

Are you a narcissist who thinks that everything is always about you?


30 posted on 04/26/2010 11:05:13 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.mohavedailynews.com/articles/2010/04/26/news/local/doc4bd523c70ef73660583516.txt

Az birther bill

McLain said Obama took too long to show proof of his citizenship. Obama’s mother was an American citizen but his father was from Kenya.Arizona Rep. Doris Goodale, R-Kingman, also supported the bill, saying so many hours and so much energy was spent in the past year debating the issue of Obama’s birth.“This bill is to prevent the angst and frustration with this situation occurring again,” Goodale said. “This will place Arizona in a solid position of knowing, proving the certification and requirements for the candidacy for our highest office.”“I have no problem requiring candidates prove they meet the qualifications to run for office. From the top of the ballot to the bottom,” Arizona Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City said.


31 posted on 04/26/2010 11:09:16 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; jamese777

I’d say you’ve exposed this obamanoid, Beckwith! This poster has been bending truth for weeks, trying to give cover to the affirmative action liar-in-chief. Now, the effectiveness of exposing the malignant narcissism of the sonofabitch in the Oval Office is showing up in the tlking points to be used in defending the lair and his illegitimacy.


32 posted on 04/26/2010 11:28:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

Az birther bill

McLain said Obama took too long to show proof of his citizenship. Obama’s mother was an American citizen but his father was from Kenya.Arizona Rep. Doris Goodale, R-Kingman, also supported the bill, saying so many hours and so much energy was spent in the past year debating the issue of Obama’s birth.“This bill is to prevent the angst and frustration with this situation occurring again,” Goodale said. “This will place Arizona in a solid position of knowing, proving the certification and requirements for the candidacy for our highest office.”“I have no problem requiring candidates prove they meet the qualifications to run for office. From the top of the ballot to the bottom,” Arizona Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City said.


In 2010, Obama will present his computerized print out COLB to get on the ballot in Arizona. Nowhere in the law that just passed does it state what form of proof is required. The Federal government accepts the Hawaii short form as proof for issuing a passport and at the bottom of every Hawaii Certification of Live Birth it states: “This copy is prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.” The state of Hawaii has considered the short form COLB as the official birth certificate of the state since they computerized their vital records in 2001.
The Arizona law wiil not require a long form, vault copy, original birth certificate.


33 posted on 04/26/2010 12:31:53 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

The base hospital McCain claimed for his birthplace wasn’t even authorized to be built until 1941. McCain was born in 1936. There are various sites when a search is made showing he was born in Colon Hospital in the Republic of Panama, not on a U.S. military base. Back to SR 511: if there were no question it would have not been necessary, but Obama used it to try and make his own NBC legitimate. It was a trick and both parties were at fault. Repubs thought McCain would defeat Hillary because of her known liberalism. With Obama’s deception (failure to tell what he was all about), Dems had ACORN, SEIU and the black vote, which I believe is how they won Congress in 2006 as well. I also believe the secret session of Mar. 12, 2008 about the economy to fail in Sept., gov’t finances to fail in Feb. ‘09, civil war, etc. caused many Congressmen to believe a catastrophe was imminent and globalism, and world government was the way to go. (Ben Pershing, Washington Post, 3/13/08 “House holds rare closed session” and also Gold and Silver Exchange, March 13/2008, “Closed door session of Congress predicted the present economic crisis.”


34 posted on 04/26/2010 5:10:15 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: southernsunshine; Protect the Bill of Rights; 2ndDivisionVet
I think that one came from the Reverend Manning.

That is where I recall hearing it. And yes, I do believe he has a fast approaching court date.

35 posted on 04/26/2010 8:20:47 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
Every Congressman has known since early in 2008 that neither McCain nor Obama was eligible for the Presidency.

Why weren't any questions about McCain's eligibility raised during the 2000 campaign? Why wait until 2008?

36 posted on 04/26/2010 8:28:15 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Thanks
:-)


37 posted on 04/26/2010 8:29:47 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (Just another loony nationalistic egotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Thank you for the list and the excellent history lesson.

The GOP should set a good example by cleaning up its own act first with regard to Presidential candidates of dubious eligibility. Mr. Arthur is a stain that can never be removed, unfortunately.


38 posted on 04/26/2010 8:32:30 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Do YOU fear Obama?
_______________
No and HELL NO! He can KMA. I fear for the future of my children.


39 posted on 04/26/2010 8:38:47 PM PDT by mojitojoe (“Our leaders seek to pit us against one another, and torment us relentlessly."Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hillbillary

No sh*t. He moved there for the lovely weather. LMAO! Crime City.


40 posted on 04/26/2010 8:40:05 PM PDT by mojitojoe (“Our leaders seek to pit us against one another, and torment us relentlessly."Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson