Skip to comments.
Fred Malek: Palin’s not doing what she needs to do to run
HOTAIR.COM ^
| 16 APRIL 2010
| ALLAHPUNDIT
Posted on 04/16/2010 5:28:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Whos Fred Malek and why should you care? Think of him as sort of the Beltway-insider equivalent of John Ziegler. Like Ziegs, hes a Sarahcuda defender par excellence, and like Ziegs, he doesnt think shes angling for a serious shot at the presidency. From a WaPo profile last year describing him as the authority on Palin:
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: fredmalek; malek; malek4romney; malekantipalin; operationleper; palin; palin2012; palinistasattack; romney; romneyantipalin; romneythrewelection; saboteurromney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 621 next last
To: Man50D
221
posted on
04/17/2010 8:54:51 AM PDT
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: Man50D
Now you've associated me with Paul, then Huckabee. Who's next on you desperation list? How about Mitt? You are of course a self proclaimed third party supporter.
Which third party candidate did you vote for in the last election?
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Palin is running. Running to the bank.
223
posted on
04/17/2010 9:11:06 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: MikefromOhio
I personally think its rather obvious that she has either not made her mind up to run OR she has made her mind up and would rather play king-maker in the process. She has said that she would run if the situation is right for her family and for the country.
Why not take her at her word?
To: MikefromOhio; Extremely Extreme Extremist
I dont think shes running for President. Neither do I.
225
posted on
04/17/2010 9:15:54 AM PDT
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: rintense
I didn’t excuse Tanc’s endorsement of Flipper. I was pissed because Hunter was still in the race. Nor did I excuse Hunter’s of Huckabee. He should have refrained altogether.
WHy do you come up with fictitious things I said. I’m just now learning to forgive the bastard Tancredo for that.
226
posted on
04/17/2010 9:43:17 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: JApost; Man50D
go f yourself then ESAD More love-filled commentary from the Palindrones.
227
posted on
04/17/2010 9:46:22 AM PDT
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: rintense
BTW, I wholeheartedly disagree with the premise of this thread’s article. Palin is getting more exposure than any unannounced candidate in all of human history. She’s in a perfect spot if she decides to run.
228
posted on
04/17/2010 9:48:26 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Man50D
They’re all reliable conservatives who Sarah supported.
229
posted on
04/17/2010 10:07:02 AM PDT
by
Jacob Kell
(For he is B. Hussein Obama, King of the RDDBs, and may all lesser RDDBs bow before him!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Man50D; pissant; UCFRoadWarrior; donna; Kimberly GG; indylindy; ...
Thats a non-issue now which will have no impact on her future ambitions.Not unless McCain ekes out a win and then turns around and stabs her in the back.
It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her "loyalty" to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for.
To: pissant
You said Tancredo endorsed Romney because Romney had the best immigration plan. Then you said Hunter endorsed Huck because HE had the best immigration plan.
So, since both Huck and Romney were still in it when Tancredo left, why would he endorse someone who's plan was not as good as someone elses? We know the answer.
You stating Hunter endorsed Huck because he had the best immigration plan is the exact same reasoning others here on FR are flamed for- a single issue.
Now, no one is saying immigration isn't an important one.
But be fair in your criticism of candidates.
To: rabscuttle385
“It's funny how Palin supporters twist themselves into intellectual pretzels in order to rationalize away her “loyalty” to a man who is decidedly disloyal to everything Palin claims to stand for.”
Well, if one believes someone has been chosen by God at this exact moment in time to lead them out of whatever wilderness they believe themselves to be in, then anything that person says or does no matter how inconsistent or hypocritical, is subordinate and trivial to achieving the end game...or maybe this case, the end times.
The problem is that is not going to fly with the middle road, independent and blue dog dem votes one will need to to gain 50%+1 and the oval office.
Personally, I'm a little scared of what Palin might do with nukes vis-a-vis Israel and middle east countries.
232
posted on
04/17/2010 10:27:04 AM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Man50D
Shes certainly not helping herself by supporting flaming socialist McAmnesty. And Romney.
233
posted on
04/17/2010 10:52:38 AM PDT
by
Mojave
(Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
To: Pollster1
To win, Sarah would have to build name recognition, and I rarely hear mention of her in more than one or two stories per day on the morning and evening news, on Sunday morning interview shows, in White House press conferences, on her schedule for speeches in 20 states, or in discussions in a business settingTo win, she would have to build a reputation for understanding a broad range of issues, from nuclear weapons and defense to health care and the Constitution, and I rarely hear more than two or three sensible positions that she has taken on those issues in a particular day. You forgot the [/sarcasm] tag. She is the only one that the MSM criticizes on a daily basis. That should tell you something.
Or as John McEnroe would say "You can not be serious!"
234
posted on
04/17/2010 10:57:07 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(So how is that Hopey Changey thingy working out for ya America?)
To: meadsjn
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
She's not going to run, but IMO she will help others do so.
She makes too much money on the sidelines.
The hassle for her is probable three times more so than other candidates at this point.
236
posted on
04/17/2010 11:05:55 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: CAluvdubya
You are not worth my time when you can't even say who you support and deflect the question.
And yet you feel compelled to respond anytime someone questions any of Palin's positions.
And.....all who can read will see that your questions have been answered, several times, on this thread and many previous threads.
Now you speak for all people? There are several on this thread who have disagreed but you conveniently ignore their remarks. All my questions have been answered if you exclude Palin's support for amnesty.
Your problem? Sarah Palin is not perceived the way a handful of detractors on FR like to portray her.
You perceive anyone who dares to question Palin as a problem.
The FR Palin bashers have shown no respect for the owner of this site as he said just 3 days ago..."enough!" and pulled an entire thread similar to this one.
Now it's a matter of disrespect! That's a new tactic. You Sarahbots just keep reaching out a little farther to avoid discussing Palin's support for a flaming socialist over A Conservative. LOL!!
You all are starting to look more like paid political trolls than concerned citizens.
Yeah, that's it. Anyone who disagrees with you is part of one big socialist conspiracy. Hurry, click on the report abuse button to have me zotted before I destroy FR!!!!!
237
posted on
04/17/2010 11:11:12 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Bob J
Personally, I'm a little scared of what Palin might do with nukes vis-a-vis Israel and middle east countries. Oh dear, BobJ.
Your worries are misplaced.
238
posted on
04/17/2010 11:13:21 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: SmokingJoe
Not the same old anti-Palin rubbish again!
Tell me something, did you follow the 1980 GOP primaries between Reagan and Bush Snr at all, before Bush became Reagan's VP candidate that is?
Rubbish? That's a new label to minimize her amnesty position. Good one! Now you want you turn the clock back 30 years to avoid discussing Palin? Why not revert back to the Lincoln-Douglas debates? Every time I think I've seen the depth of desperation of Palin supporters you prove me wrong.
239
posted on
04/17/2010 11:15:58 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: FreeReign
You are of course a self proclaimed third party supporter.
Which third party candidate did you vote for in the last election?
Don't you Sarahbots ever get tired of this lame tactic to distract people's attention away from Palin?
240
posted on
04/17/2010 11:18:26 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 621 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson