You mean her amnesty position whereby she is against amnesty (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly on every single Palin thread (with links) you have polluted with your presence), right?
“Now you want you turn the clock back 30 years to avoid discussing Palin? “
You have been continually hammered on Palin threads since you started showing spewing your nonsense. Why would anyone be bothered taking you on, given that you are empty barrel that is full of noise but nothing else?
“Why not revert back to the Lincoln-Douglas debates?”
Because the Reagan/Bush example was directly applicable to what you were saying in that post. I notice that you never bothered to answer the question I asked, but instead, have resorted to empty rhetoric which totally avoids the issue, as usual.
“Every time I think I've seen the depth of desperation of Palin supporters you prove me wrong”
Every time you open your mouth, you stink up the joint. People have to hold their noses just to to avoid the acrid stench that emanates from your direction.