Posted on 03/15/2010 2:45:10 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
The leader of the Iranian Revolution in 1989, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, wrote extensively on Islamic Jurisprudence. A two-volume book, which was published originally in Arabic, was called ‘Tahrir al Wasilah’. Translated into Farsi, the book is called “Tahrirolvasyleh.” Khomeini also had another treatise on Islamic rules for living, called in English, “The Little Green Book.”
It is useful to understand what an esteemed Islamic leader such as the Ayatollah teaches his followers.
Here are some excerpts from “Tahrirolvasyleh” which Muslims probably don’t want you to know about Islam:
A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven. ["Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990]
A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighbouring village is reasonable.
If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned.
(Excerpt) Read more at uncoverage.net ...
it’s not a gutter religion. Gutters are cleaner and it ain’t a religion, more like a Bedo’s war-tribe cult
I predict there will be a time when the SCOTUS will review a case when some Muslim pervert who violated a child or children will say he was expressing his First Amendment Rights.
Hopefully, the Supremes will rule it a mala in se crime and deny the petition.
"Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin" -- Isaiah 30:1
Shia forums call these stories, that "graced" our morning here, "propaganda" and lies, saying that volume 4 does not exist but offer no links or evidence to the contrary. We should be reminded that Muslims have an obligation to deceive the "infidels," so their denial without verifiable evidence is worthless.
But even if volume 4 did not exist, pedophilia and the use of young boys for pleasure in Muslim societies has been well documented as fact. Female circumcision and mercy killings likewise. Hadith's and Surahs testify for themselves what Islam believes. There is no need for anyone to 'fabricate' the truth about Islam. This Bedouin perversion and moon-god worship is well known but for some reason the western public is kept in the dark about it, even intentionally misinformed (wasn't it GWB who called Islam the "religion of peace?"). I guess it has to do with the price of oil.
This is the kind of stuff we should have on our nightly news, every night, because the American people simply don't know and will not take the time to learn on their own. I mean, how many have bothered to read the Koran, and more importantly the hadiths? How many know what is taqquiya (sometimes spelled taquiyya)?
Islam's perverse nature should become public knowledge. But I am sure some "human rights" groups would object on behalf of those "moderate" and "peace-loving" Muslims—the two or three of them.
BTW, I would think twice before going to a Middle Eastern restaurant for a shishekabob...
And the EU is thinking about bringing Turkey into the union so Turks can settle anywhere they like there? Quick, hide your wives, daughters, sons and pets! Might as well throw in sons-in-law too...
Makes you wander what Princess Di was thinking when she latched herself to that Egyptian boyfriend of hers and what was really behind the tragedy that followed.
INDEED TO THE MAX.
Why would you agree with a hyper-psuedo-rationalist?
LOL.
Sometimes they are correct!
And, imho, they deserve affirmation when they are.
And those issues are horrendously important in our era and world currently and going to become more so.
LOL.
Sometimes they are correct!
By whose standards? Yours? Who died and left you in charge?
At other times on other issues . . .
they can be horrifically and terminally WRONG.
...in your opinion.
Apples and oranges. The other times are nebulous, subjective and 'supernatural,' and this time is in black and white, real, and with nothing left to imagination or 'inspiration.'
We know what Islam professes. We don't have to 'believe' it. You don't need special 'eyes and ears' to see and hear; anyone who can read is privilegded to see the truth.
I see your studies have either lead you to learn Arabic, or find an honest translation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.