Cheers!
Posted on 03/15/2010 2:45:10 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Bukkaki O’Bunga is headed for a big dissappointment. Real big. :-)
Thank you for clarifying that.
Who are we to judge?
< / moral relativism >
“Please... just try it here...”
.
They’re already doing it and it is government’s official policy that Islam is a ROP. Look around and notice those sinister mosques marring the American landscape.
Wow. These people are unreachable.
Sheesh, couldn’t you have waited telling me that story until after I had my first drink? I guess I’ll have to start early today.
LOL. An older gentleman friend of mine told me about a worker on a farm near him who was caught ummm...’abusing’ the cows at night. The animals weren’t destroyed, they still went to market when it was time. Guess you never know who’s been ‘at’ your meat, no matter where it comes from.
I have a feeling we are all going to want to drink ourselves into oblivion by the 2013 gets here.
What do you call a muslim who owns a goat and a sheep?
Bisexual.
What do you call a muslim who owns a herd of sheep?
A pimp.
Sure gives insight into Kevin Jennings and the rest of Obama’s administration, eh?
LOL Good ones!
Sick beyond belief.
Cheers!
That is only part of the stanza. The complete paragraph states that there will be a total of 100 virgins: 72 FEMALES and 28 BOYS.
Freepers, in their generosity and tolerance, oftentimes pass up that fact, in deference to one of the great religions of the world.
I know because I made the same mistake myself.
It is a common assumption among many imams that the stanza about being able to orgasm 100 times a day, and the stanza about there being 72 female perpetual virgin spirits, are reconciled by the “young boys scattered about like pearls” being called upon to make up the extra 28 to fill the ‘100 times a day’ quota without having to do any of the female spirits twice in the same day.
Nowhere is the actual number of “28 boys” stated directly; it is the difference between the “100 times a day” and the “72 perpetual virgins”.
At least when challenged to support my assertion (identical to your own) I was unable to find any direct source.
Let me know if you find one, otherwise it is a common interpretation, but not directly stated.
Coincidentally, I was banned from FR years ago for speaking ill of islam. I think I called it "a gutter religion", and some Freepers objected to that terminology.
My, how things have changed, and for the better!
But it is merely an interpretation.
What is not in doubt is that their “paradise” sounds like an X-rated movie; with 100 orgasms a day, 72 perpetual virgin spirits, and “young boys scattered about like pearls” in an obvious sexual context. And that is all direct from the Quran.
“If a father (or paternal grandfather) marries off his daughter (or granddaughter) in her absence without knowing for a certainty that she is alive, the marriage becomes null and void as soon as it is established that she was dead at the time of the marriage.”
These people are wacky!
That anyone would even think of doing some of these acts is unreal enough, but to excuse them and legislate them is beyond belief.
Some more lovable deeds of our Mozzie “friends”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.