'Climate science' is an oxymoron. Time for Zero Tolerance of Green agendas

Telegraph Blogs (U.K.) ^ | January 6, 2010 | Gerald Warner

[Schnucki]

Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative…

“Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city, town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their credibility is 20 degrees below zero.

Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker with their hands high and “fess up”. Patronisingly fobbing off the public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain Britain’s Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of –25C? Is it the Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951?

The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal despoliation of citizens.

2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green taxes? We won’t pay them. Nor will we vote

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[Boonie]

How do we not pay if they become federally payroll deducted????

[uncommonsense]

Very well said!

[manc]

good article

here in FL the last two winters have been way below normal right now it is in the 30’s and it’s not even night.

We’re looking at the rest of the week of minus every night and never going above 35.

stuff the global warming where the sun doesn’t shine and if anyone actually stills thinks that it exists then there as nutty as men chopping off their penis and thinking they’re a woman or a man thinking it’s hey OK and normal to have sex with another fells arse.

[manc]

good article

here in FL the last two winters have been way below normal right now it is in the 30’s and it’s not even night.

We’re looking at the rest of the week of minus every night and never going above 35.

stuff the global warming where the sun doesn’t shine and if anyone actually stills thinks that it exists then there as nutty as men chopping off their penis and thinking they’re a woman or a man thinking it’s hey OK and normal to have sex with another fellas arse.

[equalitybeforethelaw]

For english speakers like myself “Grand Peur” is French for Great Fear. The original providence of the term came from the French Revolution; fearing you may be next for execution. This being a British article I guess it is appropriate to use the expression. Press 2 for English.

[rdl6989]

Snow is a possibility in south Florida for the first time since 1977:

First Alert Weather meteorologist Eric Burris said near-freezing temperatures combined with moisture provides the potential for something that hasn’t happened in South Florida since 1977.

“We’re talking about the potential — and I underline the word potential — for some snow flurries,” Burris said.

http://www.wpbf.com/weather/22149508/detail.html

[marvlus]

later read.

[steelyourfaith]

1200 records set this past week for cold and snow in the USofA.

I believe the "oxymoron" term is applicable only to the warmist/prostitute scientists, the ones that massage the truth to keep the government grants flowing.

I'd say that true climatology science would be more like medical science. An incomplete science.

While we understand much through the scientific method and are constantly adding to our knowledge, the vastness of the factors influencing those two disciplines confounds our ability to totally comprehend them with our current knowledge.