Skip to comments.
Hidden Clause: Reid Bill Says Future Congresses Cannot Repeal Parts of Reid Bill!
Dittos Rush! ^
| 12-22-09
| James
Posted on 12/22/2009 6:34:41 AM PST by iloveamerica1980
Video: This is getting really sickening folks! The Weekly Standard: The Reid bill declares on page 1020 that the Independent Medicare Advisory Board cannot be repealed by future Congresses. I am beside myself!
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: iloveamerica1980
Yeah...it's Crap! One Congress is not bound by the actions of a previous Congress.
21
posted on
12/22/2009 6:50:33 AM PST
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
To: iloveamerica1980
No Congress can restrict what any other one does. That's why ten year budget projections are a total joke.
22
posted on
12/22/2009 6:51:30 AM PST
by
TWfromTEXAS
(Life is the one choice that pro choicers will not support.)
To: iloveamerica1980
“The Reid bill declares on page 1020 that the Independent Medicare Advisory Board cannot be repealed by future Congresses.”
What's the problem? Defund the board, make it necessary to gain Congressional approval for members of the board, and assign a negative salary to its members. If the board has zero budget, no members, and anyone foolish enough to volunteer has to pay $100,000 per year for the privilege, its existence won't matter.
23
posted on
12/22/2009 6:51:48 AM PST
by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: ecomcon
The electorate was warned don’t put the far left in control of the entire government. Many people supposedly in the center, and even rightward leaners, scoffed and said no it was fine. They believed what they wanted to believe, and rejected the idea that tyranny could come to America. Now we all suffer the consequences.
24
posted on
12/22/2009 6:51:57 AM PST
by
TNCMAXQ
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Sotomayor will rule in her infinite wisdom in favor of Harry and the 60 thieves.
25
posted on
12/22/2009 6:52:49 AM PST
by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
To: iloveamerica1980
This is tyranny of the majority.. A system of repeal MUST always exist within a democracy..
D-
26
posted on
12/22/2009 6:53:40 AM PST
by
D521646
To: grady
Viola! Problem solved. And just what does a medium-sized member of the violin family of instruments have to do the problem?
27
posted on
12/22/2009 6:54:57 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
To: iloveamerica1980
If it turns out that BO is not a natural born citizen then it will be null and void!
28
posted on
12/22/2009 6:55:09 AM PST
by
big bad easter bunny
(A lie can get half way around the world before the truth gets it's boots on!-Mark Twain)
To: iloveamerica1980
Hey Harry wanna bet?
If congress can givith, congress can take it away.
29
posted on
12/22/2009 6:55:40 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: iloveamerica1980
If enough people have the will, anything can be repealed. Anything.
To: iloveamerica1980
The Reid Bill needs to be torched!
To: jersey117
What should we do with Reid and his girlfriend Pelosi after the revolution?
32
posted on
12/22/2009 6:58:44 AM PST
by
IbJensen
(A Prayer for Obama (Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
To: grady
Congress cannot bind a future Congress except by constitutional amendment. All a future Congress has to do is pass legislation deleting that language. Viola! Problem solved. Totally legally correct (the possible effect of treaties notwithstanding)
They may try to make it so under some concept of a financial obligation, but if arguing against this law before the SCOTUS, I would use this phrase as an example of how the entire bill is flawed.
This also says to me that the bill was written by policy wonks, not experienced lawyers.
Remember, in 2000+ pages, I'm sure we can find something to pound the Constitutional podium about!
33
posted on
12/22/2009 6:58:44 AM PST
by
MindBender26
(Never kick Libs when they're down. Wait 'till they're 1/2 way back up. You get much better leverage!)
To: iloveamerica1980
local contact and fax numbers for Senators (demwits)Email them but the Phone is the best route.
Remind them that obamanationcare effects EVERY ONE!
VA cuts, retired Military..Tri Care for Life (nearly $5,000 in new fees) 8% cut in Medicare, increased premiums, 15% cut to nursing homes and for Pete's sake why are we creating a new tax on special needs kids? And why do we need 111 NEW federal agencies to 'oversee' obamnationcare? Oh, that is how he is 'growing' jobs!
34
posted on
12/22/2009 7:02:06 AM PST
by
GailA
(JESUS is Christmas! Cradle in the shadow of a Cross)
To: cripplecreek
Well congress may not be able to repeal it but they can refuse to fund it...
35
posted on
12/22/2009 7:02:21 AM PST
by
carcraft
(Pray for our Country)
To: iloveamerica1980
Yeah, this is BS. No congress can write a mandate that future congresses cannot overturn.
36
posted on
12/22/2009 7:05:14 AM PST
by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: IbJensen
What should we do with Reid and his girlfriend Pelosi after the revolution?I'll buy Madame Defarge a new set of knitting needles.
37
posted on
12/22/2009 7:06:55 AM PST
by
reg45
(Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Viola! Problem solved. And just what does a medium-sized member of the violin family of instruments have to do the problem?
I suppose it would depend on how hugh and series the problem was.
Please pardon my sporadic dyslexia.
38
posted on
12/22/2009 7:08:18 AM PST
by
grady
("Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading." - Unknown)
To: iloveamerica1980
So is Harry going to sue when he’s out of office and congress repeals it?
To: Richard Kimball; iloveamerica1980; carcraft; cripplecreek
Yeah, this is BS. No congress can write a mandate that future congresses cannot overturn. They can but only if it is a constitutional amendment, but that would require a 2/3'rds super majority in both the house and senate and ratification by 3/4'ths of the states.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson