http://www.c4strategies.com/ImpeachObama/impeachobama2.html
You’re all racist!
Seriously - Do you really want Joe Biden to be the next president?
It’s better to wait 3 more years and kick him out at the ballot box.
He’d have to grow a little mustache and demand we all throw our arms in the air while shouting is name before he ever gets impeached - and for some even that wouldn’t be enough.
Unfortunately, This type of action has to originate from Congress.
The Supreme Court doesn’t review “Emotional Outburts”.
If Congress didn’t back up their Inspector General when Obama fired him......We have to Fire Congressional Reps before proceeding with Impeachment grounds with newly elected Reps on the front row.
Majority Representation Rules.....and there is no Impeach majority at this point.
Catskill Joe...he’s be here all week!
Hardly solid legal grounds for impeachment.
Wake me up when he does something illegal, like lie under oath.
If, as I deeply hope and believe, that the American people will rise up and vote in such numbers as to totally shift the majority of the House of Representatives to a Republican majority...as this happens then we can impeach Obama, then Biden and the speaker of the House will be a Republican.
Nine months overdue!
With all due respect, this is silly. Aside from the fact that the House Democrats will never vote to impeach their own President, didn’t we learn from the Clinton impeachment that unless you have 67 hard core GOP senators willing to convict, impeachment means nothing.
Impeachment proceedings in and of themselves could cause a “sympathy” tilt in BO’s favor. I say wait 3 years and let Palin beat him like Reagan beat Mondale!!
It all hinges on the articles.
I believe Obama’s plan to put active U.S. Troops on U.S. soil is grounds for impeachment.
It’s something I’m not prepared to watch go down without a very loud debate.
Radio-personality Tammy Bruce may have said it best: "... ultimately, it comes down to... the fact that he seems to have, it seems to me, some malevolence toward this country, which is unabated."
I take a back seat to few in my disdain for His Excellency Al-Hashish Field Marshmallow Dr. Barack Obama Dada, COD, RIP, LSMFT, Would-Be Life President of the Republic Formerly Known as the United States, and Chairman of the Organisation of Halfrican Unity. But that said, I'd like to remind one and all that the Constitution---that ancient parchment the comprehension of which escapes both God's Only Begotten Grandson and no small volume of his supporters and critics alike---does not suggest "some malevolence toward this country" as grounds for impeachment.
On the strength of his “malevolence” you’re going to impeach him?
Dream on.
Don’t you all realize that Impeachment is only for whitie?
I’d vote to impeach this jerk in a New York minute. The problem is, both house of Congress are controlled by the dims, who would never let such a thing happen, and two, the pubs are scared sh*tless of supporting such a measure and being labeled a bunch of racists.
Like it or not, we’re stuck with this abomination until 2012.
Incompetence, naievity and malevonence, even though they’re horrible qualities for a leader to have, are not “high crimes and misdemenors”. Let the voters “impeach” him in November of 2010 and 2012.
If you’re going to make a move to impeach Obama, first you have to name the articles of impeachment. Heck, I’ll sign the petition if you can name the proposed articles of impeachment. Otherwise, this is about as loony as the left’s attempts to impeach Bush. We cant’ go around using the process of impeachment as a pseudo recall vote whenever a politician disagrees with us. That’s what elections are for. Some Freepers, sometimes, are about as ignorant about the constitution and about American politics as the liberals we hate so much, only we don’t have an excuse for being so stupid.
Extremely counterproductive if not totally kooky at this point.
7. You can be sure of succeeding in your attacks
if you only attack places which are undefended.You can
ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold
positions that cannot be attacked.
8. Hence that general is skillful in attack whose
opponent does not know what to defend; and he is skillful
in defense whose opponent does not know what to attack.
9. O divine art of subtlety and secrecy! Through you
we learn to be invisible, through you inaudible;
and hence we can hold the enemy’s fate in our hands.
10. You may advance and be absolutely irresistible,
if you make for the enemy’s weak points; you may retire
and be safe from pursuit if your movements are more rapid
than those of the enemy.
Is a solid Democrat majority in both the House and the Senate, where a battle for impeachment must be waged, a “weak point” or a “strong point” in the defense of an effort to impeach Obama?
Isn't it fun to sound just like the leftist crazies during the 8 years of Bush/Cheney?