Posted on 10/14/2009 5:51:36 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.
(Excerpt) Read more at web.archive.org ...
Just read that comment. If you spent as much time reading the threads on FR as you do bitching and whining that I haven’t shown you what I saw, you’d have found it by now.
Carry on, and have fun reaping.
I don’t know if you voted for Barr.
All I know is that every single one of your posts is in irrational defense of the Kenyan.
Good thing they got the screen capture. It’s been pulled from the web in the last couple of hours.
Plus one other thing. Are you birthers going to go after Bobby Jindal if he gets the GOP nomination for President in 2012? Oily T*tz claims he's not a natural born citizen even though he was born on American soil.
Maybe you should get off your high horse because you haven't offered any more to this thread than what I have.
Lucky for me, you calling me an Obama suckup doesn't actually make me one. It's not a job I want.
And hey, there's no need for veiled language or insults or ultimatums. Chill out a bit. When asked for any information about the phantom ad, you couldn't provide it. So the only thing to consider is your word, even though you specifically said you weren't asking people to take your word about the ad's existence. Nothing more than that, and nothing to get riled about.
And I don't know if you voted at all. So we're even.
All I know is that every single one of your posts is in irrational defense of the Kenyan.
Funny, then, that I never post to defend any of his policies or his political decisions. It's almost as if my only 'defense' of Obama is in rebutting silly conspiracy theories.
And it's conspiracy theories that are irrational. Claims of worldwide secrets and cover-ups and whatnot. What I deal in is reason, and conservatism *is* reason. Liberalism deals in feelings. Seeing conservatism undermined by bogus claims of Presidential illegitimacy is not in the best interests of conservatism or the U.S. It gives liberals the opportunity to lump Birthers and "Tenthers" (their word, not mine) together, as if it's ridiculous and irrational to believe that the Tenth Amendment serves as a limitation on the federal government. Birtherism serves only to provide fodder for those who want to dismiss conservatism as a serious, viable political philosophy.
So no, I'm not out in defense of Obama. I do what I do in defense of reason, of rationality, and of the future of conservatism.
How about this one?
CBS 60 Minutes Interview of Obama and McCain, I Am Barrack Obama and I Approve This Message
“It could cause any conservative candidate running for congress and the White House to be viewed as a kook “
ANY conservative who runs will be viewed as a kook. Maybe you don’t remember what the media did to Reagan....
1) He will start World War 3!
2) He will destroy the economy(heavy tax cuts)
3) He’s an actor! (sucessful 2 term governor of Cal.)
4) He’s a right wing extremist, like Hitler! (strait-line conservative)
“I want the GOP to take back the House and Senate in 2010 and the White House in 2012 and am against anything that could possibly stop or hinder that.”
I will tell you one sure fire way to lose. Failure to screm bloody murder about Obama and his programs. McCain told us “we had nothing to fear from an Obama Administration.” Witness the result
“Plus one other thing. Are you birthers going to go after Bobby Jindal if he gets the GOP nomination for President in 2012? “
Yes, we are all stupid, as you have stated in your own inimitable style. By the way, the term “birther” was invented by the left to trash conservatives. Thank you for using it against FReepers. I am far more interested in the following:
And we actually want to see all his records.
Why are these off limits?
1. Certified copy of original birth certificate
2. Columbia University transcripts
3. Columbia thesis paper
4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Harvard University transcripts
6. Illinois State Senate records
7. Illinois State Senate schedule
8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11. Occidental College Transcripts
12. Parent’s marriage Certificate
13. Record of baptism
14. Selective Service registration records
15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16. Scholarly articles
“Maybe you should get off your high horse because you haven’t offered any more to this thread than what I have. “
I don’t own a horse. I will let my fellow FReepers decide who is obnoxious here, and who isn’t.
That’s just a blog post about the 60 Minutes special. There’s no indication given that “Barrack” was used on the show; that phrase certainly wasn’t the title of the hour special. All appearances suggest that it’s simply the blogger’s error in titling his post.
Look, VRs, ever heard of Abrahan Lincoln?
Sure you have.
It'd behoove you to keep one of Honest Abe's best quotes near & dear to your heart: Better to keep one's mouth shut & thought a fool, than open it and remove all doubt."
You're well on your way to removing any doubt, my friend. Over your head and especially messin' with the board's "sasquatch", SJBer. ;^)
Poster Stephenjohnbanker, I and others who may take the time to respond to you are not the enemy.
Capiche?
You, OTOH, display curious behavior supposedly for one on the Right side. That strange behavior raises more questions about you than anything else including your lame attack on a very well known, well liked and very well respected forum citizen. You risk absorption, pal.
Think about it.
I will not be voting for Bobby Jindal. He has turned me off of him big time lately.
and I do not vote for the GOP. Its a stupid party run by stupid people, I will vote for conservatives, if any decide to run. Or I won’t vote at all. RINO or else kind of people can go pound sand.
Thank you, Elderberry.
None so blind as he who does not want to see. One of life’s little eternal truths.
Your comment:
“It could cause any conservative candidate running for congress and the White House to be viewed as a kook by the voters if the media successfully paints that candidate with the birther brush.”
Proves your 0bama suckup status. The media is the wholely owned subsidiary of the Democratic party. They hate all things, ideas, and people who are conservative and even all Republicans unless they are whining traitors.
To make any choices or decisions due to fear that “the media” won’t like us is aboslutely suicidal and actually one of the problems. To act in fear of the opinion of the media means being a capon, a eunuch, a kissa**, a RINO, and that is the problem.
Standing up for truth and real conservative principles is not the problem, it is the cure.
Threats? You’re out of your mind. Threats? As in “I shall taunt you again”?
People have posted all kinds of links to various spellings of the Thug In Chief’s purported name.
All you have to do is read. If you read more and posted less, you’d learn all kinds of things you claim have no existence or relevance.
Anyway, I’m now officially done with reading your silly replies.
“Standing up for truth and real conservative principles is not the problem, it is the cure.”
Exactly. Americans(as ill-informed as they are) still can smell a weak candidate a mile away. When they saw that McCain did not stand for conservative principles, and offered nothing but praise for a Marxist Chicago con man, they wrote him off.
I want conservatives to take back Congress and the White House.
The problem with handing control of the Federal government back to the Republican Party is that the American electorate already had six years of rampant spending, nation-building, and expansion of government under Bush and a Republican Congress.
If the Republicans want power back, they better show that they're actually worthy of being granted power rather than acting like they're entitled to it, simply because they're not the Democrats.
Rut Row it seems this one didn’t get cleared
Well Said
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.