Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drive-By Bulbing Raises Mercury Fears
Backcountry Notes ^ | September 26, 2009 | Jay Henderson

Posted on 09/26/2009 4:36:16 AM PDT by jay1949

Six teenagers are under observation in a Benjaminville, Virginia, hospital following the nation's first drive-by bulbing on Friday night. The incident raised concerns of mercury poisoning from the exploded CFL light bulbs used by the perpetrators. The local chapter of the Natural Resources Committee issued a statement condemning "this obvious right-wing Republican ecoterrorist hate crime."

(Excerpt) Read more at backcountrynotes.com ...


TOPICS: Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: bulbing; cflbulbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Bryanw92

Carrots may kill kids, but apparently they thrive on stray dogs and cats in Va.


21 posted on 09/26/2009 6:37:44 AM PDT by csmusaret (Joe Wilson--Speaking truth to power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Hey dude that’s fluorescent !..ha ha you misspelled a word
So ? That means what ? I misspelled a word so I’m wrong ?
Break one of those things take a deep whiff and get back to me.

Cheers !


22 posted on 09/26/2009 6:42:34 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (We don't need no stinkin video clips unrelated to the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

Thanks for the inside scoop.
One of the nice things about FR is the ability to learn from experts.
Since growing up in Cleveland in the 1950s, breathing the air and drinking the water, didn’t do me in, I’m not too worried about light bulbs.


23 posted on 09/26/2009 6:46:12 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jay1949

It looks like these Environmental idiots didn’t think about how dangerous these bulbs were before they forcedthem upon us.What dopes.


24 posted on 09/26/2009 6:54:41 AM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the Dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
Break one of those things take a deep whiff and get back to me.

(Degree in Chemistry, lots of people spelled the element "Fluorine" as "Flouring" so I'm hyper-sensitive on that one word.)

25 posted on 09/26/2009 6:59:15 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

I have often wondered about the electrical fields emitting from fluorescent bulbs/fixture....I suspect there are high electrostatic fields, from my observations of radio interference, related to the use of these bulbs/tubes.....for sure the E field is high, and the H field is probably high due the ballast, required to operate the device......

An additional concern is the X-rays emitted....

It would be interesting to research the rise in Brain cancer and the use of fluorescent bulbs.....


26 posted on 09/26/2009 6:59:50 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jay1949
BAN TOXIC TWISTYS
27 posted on 09/26/2009 7:21:16 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

Being the expert can you tell me if Ballast installation causes any health concerns.


28 posted on 09/26/2009 7:29:43 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Degree in Chemistry, lots of people spelled the element "Fluorine" as "Flouring" so I'm hyper-sensitive on that one word.

I'm from the South, so "fluorine" sounds like it should be the name of a second cousin -- Florene.

29 posted on 09/26/2009 7:53:15 AM PDT by jay1949 (Work is the curse of the blogging class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thinking

interesting piece:

http://www.neatorama.com/2008/03/02/fluorescent-tubes-powered-by-magnetic-field-of-power-lines/


30 posted on 09/26/2009 8:03:18 AM PDT by jay1949 (Work is the curse of the blogging class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

It’s ‘ethanol lighting’. Another heavy-handed, environmentally counterproductive boondoogle that Congress has imposed on us in order to reward certain special interests that have funded their incumbency.


31 posted on 09/26/2009 8:08:14 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jay1949

Soooo...that 9/12 sign that said “We come unarmed - this time” was talking about revolution by lightbulb? Just askin’


32 posted on 09/26/2009 5:02:47 PM PDT by Wife of D28Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinking

From your post it could be:

“high electrostatic fields”

“the E field is high”

“the H field is probably high”

“An additional concern is the X-rays emitted”

I’m surprised you didn’t include global warming and PMS in you list of concerns.

Lurking’


33 posted on 09/26/2009 6:01:39 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rappini

“can you tell me if Ballast installation causes any health concerns”

only if you eat the ballast after you are installing it.

Lurking’

non-flip answer:

old ballast (more than 6 years old) do not eat or burn in your Weber or campfire

new electronic ballast you can eat or smoke it )just not while plugged in).

Lurking’


34 posted on 09/26/2009 6:05:29 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Re “Heavy handed boondoggle” You got it! This should be a campaign issue but nobody seems to be touching it which lets the MSM drive the campaign train. I rail on it in my website http://www.theusmat.com/ but nobody reads that. A few more incidents where one of these things is found to cause serious illness or worse and gets reported may make it a public issue


35 posted on 09/27/2009 6:05:55 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (We don't need no stinkin video clips unrelated to the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

I liked your first answer better.

Rappini


36 posted on 09/27/2009 6:06:50 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

Appears, what I posted was beyond your pay-scale and understanding....continue to wear your tin-foil hat....


37 posted on 09/27/2009 6:28:21 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

“You are absolutely and categorically wrong”

All I know is what I read from EPA bulletins

Your assertion is ;Because you claim to work on, design, and build, these type bulbs There is no difference between the mercury,contained in long tube and (even less) in compact fluorescent bulbs. That both use the same method of coating the fluorine/mercury onto the tubes.

You furthur suggest There is no danger (with I assume resonable handling) but if CFL bulb breaks it can be handled like any long tube fluorescent bulb and wouldn’t require the excessive precautions cited by the EPA...And furthur that the EPA doesn’t restrict permission to use a specific type of mercury which it claims is extremely dangerous soley to the manufactuers of compact fluorescent bulbs .

Now if that is true ....Thats a WOW ....I think you should reach Joe Schultz and get on his show


38 posted on 09/27/2009 7:06:59 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (We don't need no stinkin video clips unrelated to the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

It is extremely funny that conservatives rail against big government saying it is ineffectual and counter-productive; then proceed to quote them as if they are some sort of super-science gurus who know it all.

Take it from me, some of the dumbest doorknobs I have ever met work for the EPA.

So feel safe and be happy calling on the EPA as your expert witness.

You read about, it I build it - big difference.


39 posted on 09/27/2009 7:56:23 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: thinking

you are hysterical you should be in comedy

I get it:

the high E fields

all blocked by your “tin foil hat”


40 posted on 09/27/2009 7:58:37 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson