Posted on 09/25/2009 10:05:29 PM PDT by pissant
When I first became aware that the Democratic National Committee prepared, signed and notarized two slightly different Certification of Nomination documents for the Obama-Biden ticket in the 2008 election, I was shocked and after verifying both documents as real, I wrote about it in The Theory is Now a Conspiracy and Facts Don’t Lie released on September 10, 2009.
The question was obvious – Why TWO different DNC Obama certification documents, and why did one have proper certification of constitutional eligibility in it, while the other had that certification deleted?
The Obama camp had been using the defense that the DNC had properly vetted and certified Obama’s eligibility for months. Judge after judge had used that claim and the fact that Obama’s COLB (Certification of Live Birth) had been “Snoped – FactChecked – blogged and twittered” as “legal proof” that Obama was eligible for office, despite the very real fact that Obama has never released any authenticated proof on the subject.
Then we find out that the DNC did NOT certify Obama as eligible under Article II – Section I of the Constitution, in 49 of 50 states. The DNC had only filed such certification in the state of Hawaii, Obama’s alleged birth place. The other 49 states received a Certification of Nomination which did NOT certify Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.
This story caused a firestorm of interest, comment and speculation across the web, leading Bob Unruh at World Net Daily to ask, What does Pelosi know about Obama’s eligibility?
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
OMG! Several in 2005; none in 2006; 1 in 2007; nonwe in 2008; now 2 in 2009.
Must be the Strong Silent Type.
Obama has never shown his long-form birth certificate to anyone. Calling the thing he put on the internet a “birth certificate” doesn’t make it a birth certificate. It doesn’t even SAY it’s a birth certificate.
Bump
Ya do know, all he has to do is show US the BC.
1.35 mill and counting to bury it.
Yeah, "We're" crazy!
Not even close.
Yep, and I think we know what type. Always can catch a few buzzing around birther (I prefer constitutionalist) threads.
Understanding Obama the Socialist Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LHv0b8jBI4
Hon. James David Manning speaks about Jesus being a capitalist, Obama and all Muslims are Socialist.
Understanding Obama the Socialist Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7yZ4N3VMm8
Hon. James David Manning discusses Islam, Obama and Socialism.
pissant, you really need to get a life.
They can’t AMEND the Constitution. They CAN interpret it to say what it doesn’t say. Does the word ‘penumbra’ come to mind?
IF they were to have a majority on the SCOTUS, they might determine that, for instance, BHO is ‘natural born,’ when the circumstances of his birth by his own admission leave that status ‘in doubt’ according to the last SCOTUS ruling on a case involving ‘natural born citizen.’ That ruling did not define the term as it is meant in the Constitution. A Dem majority SCOTUS would merely define the term to meet their purposes.
Precisely, so why worry with the impression that the liberal world has of conservatives? It's a forgone conclusion to liberals that we're nuts anyway. With so much at stake, the main concern of conservatives should be for the state of our Republic and the thoughts of those who already hate us be damned.
A group of men over 200 years ago who today would be thought to be on “the edge of society”, gave birth to a Nation.
I can see how you are very prickly about the subject, but honestly I have looked very hard for evidence of a valid looking a birth certificate for the Resident, and reviewed the various pieces of material published. The only thing that looks very authentic to me is the one from Kenya. See the WND article at this link. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=105764
It looks a lot like the ones my daughters got in the UK, almost identical, where births are recorded in an actual book during a visit by the parent, just like in Kenya. The certificate my girls have from the UK verifies the existence of the entry by the registrar, just like the one from Kenya does for BO.
That thing published by Hawaii looks like it was printed on any old PC. Here it is at this link from Bartcop - where he explains how goofy the freepers are too, which you must apparently agree with: http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2009/07/23/obamas-birth-certificate-and-the-wing-nuts-version-20/
So my question is, why, if the Whtie house is so secure in the entitlement of this socialist to be elected to the office of the presidency, will they not release the actual birth certificate, which should look like this one, from a similar era in Hawaii? http://forums.blueridgenow.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1601091365/m/7451098009/r/2431033109 If you scroll down this link to a blue ridge forum, you will see a posting by nguffy with a picture of a real Hawaii birth certificate from that era. It looks like the same sort of document I have from my birth a few years earlier in CA - a print from a permanent record in long form.
So, given that it is such a controversy, and given that the dude is sitting in the Oval office, why not just do what Lou Dobbs suggests and publish the certificate, the real original one, and put all the the questions to rest?
Instead, people who look critically at the published evidence are demonized and attacked as “birthers”, whatever that is, and told by people like you to focus on real issues.
Well, if the Obama is not a natural born citizen of the US and is not entitled to be in the office of President, that is kind of a real issue is it not?
And, would it not be real simple and easy to put it to rest?
Given all the smoke, and the smokescreen to hide whatever is the truth of the issue, I can only assume that there really is fire, and the Obama is actually not a natural born citizen, having thoughtfully considered the information available.
If he really cared, and wanted to convince someone like me, he would just clarify with the truth, would he not, instead of playing games and being silent about it.
I am fully convinced that the birth and death registration book from Coastal Province Kenya, the book with the entry in it, has been filched by someone who is holding a great deal of influence now over the man, probably someone in the muslim world, given the policies that he is implementing.
I am not paranoid my friend. I believe the country is actually in very grave peril, and that a series of incredibly dangerous events are unfolding before our eyes in a pre-planned scheme to carefully and methodically destroy freedom in our country for ever. That is exactly the reason why this issue is not “ridiculous” - -it leads to the next question, which is, so who are this guy’s handlers and what do they want. No doubt you have all the answers to that one too, and there is nothing to worry about from your perspective.
Keep plugging away..step by step...he will be exposed for what he is. pay no attention to the Obama worshipers on this thread.
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaCOLB.htm
better you check out the background before you make a complete A$$ of yourself.
You make yourself look silly as well as weak.
I’m not stopping until I see his documentation, so either help or get the hell out of my way.
I think the next protest ought to be at every state and federal courthouse in the country demanding that a judge order the release of all documents that prove his “resume” and birth origin.
That ought to be the next Tea Party.
TheArizona
I'm amazed at the lazy cowards in our government. And I hope Obama's not being blackmailed by a muslim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
