Skip to comments.
DNC Failed to Certify Obama as Eligible in MOST States!
CFP ^
| 9/25/09
| JB Williams
Posted on 09/25/2009 10:05:29 PM PDT by pissant
When I first became aware that the Democratic National Committee prepared, signed and notarized two slightly different Certification of Nomination documents for the Obama-Biden ticket in the 2008 election, I was shocked and after verifying both documents as real, I wrote about it in The Theory is Now a Conspiracy and Facts Dont Lie released on September 10, 2009.
The question was obvious Why TWO different DNC Obama certification documents, and why did one have proper certification of constitutional eligibility in it, while the other had that certification deleted?
The Obama camp had been using the defense that the DNC had properly vetted and certified Obamas eligibility for months. Judge after judge had used that claim and the fact that Obamas COLB (Certification of Live Birth) had been Snoped FactChecked blogged and twittered as legal proof that Obama was eligible for office, despite the very real fact that Obama has never released any authenticated proof on the subject.
Then we find out that the DNC did NOT certify Obama as eligible under Article II Section I of the Constitution, in 49 of 50 states. The DNC had only filed such certification in the state of Hawaii, Obamas alleged birth place. The other 49 states received a Certification of Nomination which did NOT certify Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.
This story caused a firestorm of interest, comment and speculation across the web, leading Bob Unruh at World Net Daily to ask, What does Pelosi know about Obamas eligibility?
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bcrepository; birther; certification; certifigate; certifigte; communistcoup; eligible; glennbeck; healthcare; islam; larrysinclairslover; military; obama; obamacare; palin; pelosi; politics; states; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
And they lied through their teeth in the states they did 'certify' him
1
posted on
09/25/2009 10:05:29 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: pissant; LucyT; STARWISE
2
posted on
09/25/2009 10:06:23 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(A mob of one.)
To: pissant
All Liberals know how to do is lie.
3
posted on
09/25/2009 10:07:29 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
To: pissant
this is a dead horse, unfortunately....we could get a Supreme Court ruling saying that zero is not technically the prez and we would then get the rats to make new law that allows it....ala Mass. rat party and the Senate seat.....
I wish it weren't so...but there it is....
4
posted on
09/25/2009 10:08:08 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: pissant
The DNC and ACORN — conspired to steal the elction in 2008?
I wonder if we’ll ever know — we may not know in time to save our Republic.
5
posted on
09/25/2009 10:08:37 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
To: cherry
6
posted on
09/25/2009 10:08:41 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Jet Jaguar
Why should any of us have to follow the directives of this criminal enterprise? The federal government has lost its mind and has destroyed our freedom.
7
posted on
09/25/2009 10:08:57 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Jet Jaguar
8
posted on
09/25/2009 10:11:22 PM PDT
by
Eccl 10:2
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
To: pissant
2008 was definitely a “different” type of “election”. The kind of “election” that the U.N. usually sends that buffoon, Jimmah Cahtah, to preside over down in the banana republics.
9
posted on
09/25/2009 10:11:28 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
To: cherry
To: cherry
Given such a ruling by the SCOTUS, the US military would have the final de facto say regarding who is, or is not, POTUS. Based on past history, they would probably back the SCOTUS. They probably wouldn't have to do anything other than state that, based on the SCOTUS ruling, they no longer recognize Obama as Commander in Chief. Were that to happen, the debate would be over (with apologies to Al Gore.)
11
posted on
09/25/2009 10:19:31 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Party like it's 1776!)
To: pissant
This is strictly MIB-Grassy Knoll-I Saw Elvis stuff. Sober minded adults should be focusing on what
makes a difference, what can better our cause and our country, not this ridiculous Truther-equivalent.
The conservative movement really needs to abandon this paranoia and address the issues, established facts, and ideas on the ground.
To: Jet Jaguar; jcsjcm; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ..
DNC Failed to Certify Obama as Eligible in MOST States!
.
13
posted on
09/25/2009 10:21:56 PM PDT
by
LucyT
("The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." - M.Thatcher)
To: Churchjack
Then get off the thread. It’s real easy to ignore subjects that don’t interest you. Try it some time, skippy.
14
posted on
09/25/2009 10:23:49 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Churchjack
Are you freaking kidding? The DNC did something purposeful in filing as they did. This needs to be examined for fraud, somewhat along the lines of your post.
15
posted on
09/25/2009 10:26:41 PM PDT
by
Hoosier-Daddy
("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
16
posted on
09/25/2009 10:30:24 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: cherry
No LAW can overturn the Constitution. If the Dems want to amend the Constitution, it would have to pass not only in the Congress but with 2/3 of the states’ legislatures.
17
posted on
09/25/2009 10:30:38 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
(A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
To: LucyT
18
posted on
09/25/2009 10:30:44 PM PDT
by
Velveeta
To: LucyT
19
posted on
09/25/2009 10:31:20 PM PDT
by
Velveeta
To: Churchjack
“Sober minded adults should be focusing on what makes a difference,”
Sounds like the Constitution doesn’t make a difference to you, skippy.
20
posted on
09/25/2009 10:33:38 PM PDT
by
Balata
(Obama's actions clearly show a "CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT"!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson