Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Good
1 posted on 09/17/2009 2:08:07 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pissant

Go get ‘em.


2 posted on 09/17/2009 2:09:48 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (purple durple lips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

ping


3 posted on 09/17/2009 2:11:45 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

If Captain Rhodes fully complies with her military orders in every way can she request the military courts to review the legitimacy of her orders?


4 posted on 09/17/2009 2:12:32 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
the evidence objected to by Land, concerning Social Security Numbers was gathered by a famous detective of Scotland Yard

There's those pesky SSNs again. And, the result of a Scotlnad Yard (MI5?) investigation, to boot.I'm really curious about those...maybe more than the LF/BC.

7 posted on 09/17/2009 2:16:11 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

First she accuses Chief Justice Roberts of allowing criminal activities to be ongoing in the SCOTUS and now she’s deriding this Judge... The outcome at some point is going to be interesting if she continues.


8 posted on 09/17/2009 2:17:56 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; LucyT
This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation.

A monumental statement.

10 posted on 09/17/2009 2:32:42 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
It's hard to imagine any “conspiracy theory” being easier to disprove, than the questions about BHO’s Constitutional qualifications for office. That's why I lend it credence.

Perhaps, it didn't start out as a conspiracy. It's entirely possible that BHO, acting alone, chose to falsify his “natural born” citizen status.

However, as this drags on, more and more people are at least guilty of willful nonfeasance, for insisting on a proper vetting. These people aren't “conspirators”; but, they could be enabling a conspiracy.

Of course, if BHO is actually qualified for his Office, then there has been no conspiracy — unless, it's a conspiracy to play rope-a-dope with the “birthers”.

The release of one, simple, original government-issued document would settle the matter.

11 posted on 09/17/2009 2:37:36 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

With all due respect to my fellow freepers, this is an example of how hard it is to pursue a frivolous lawsuit in court. Judges will do these kinds of things to you.

parsy, who says remember this the next time you start hollering about frivolous claims in malpractice tort issues


15 posted on 09/17/2009 2:50:44 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

INTREP


17 posted on 09/17/2009 3:14:40 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Judge Clay D. Land was nominated by President George W. Bush on September 21, 2001, to a seat vacated by J. Robert Elliot. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on December 13, 2001, and received his commission on December 21, 2001.

Something is truly up with this for so many to participate in this cover up.

19 posted on 09/17/2009 3:37:09 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; All

Well Judge Land rule on this new motion? If so, what good is it. Shouldn’t it be seen by another judge to at least give the appearance of impartiality?


20 posted on 09/17/2009 3:39:43 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

"Ex Parte meetings Rule! Long live tyrants! Death to the American Constitution."


28 posted on 09/17/2009 4:00:48 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Any judge who grants standing will no longer be sitting.


39 posted on 09/17/2009 5:29:27 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Yesterday, Judge Clay D. Land garnered nationally notoriety for his rejection of Captain’s Rhodes’ case, with a severe ruling that was widely faulted by legal experts across the nation.

What legal experts?

50 posted on 09/17/2009 6:07:12 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

With this motion, Dr. Taitz is likely in violation of the court’s order not to file more frivilous motions in this court. It will be interesting to see how the good judge reacts to this, especially considering some of the rather abrasive wording of her new motion.


82 posted on 09/17/2009 7:06:20 PM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
"Yesterday, Judge Clay D. Land garnered nationally notoriety for his rejection of Captain’s Rhodes’ case, with a severe ruling that was widely faulted by legal experts across the nation."

Oh really?

Where is a list of these many experts?

93 posted on 09/17/2009 7:24:43 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Obviously ‘Judge’ Land is just another Black Collar Criminal.

It should be fairly easy after this to have him removed due to his exposed bias.


112 posted on 09/17/2009 8:19:02 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Lay it on Orly. You have more than half of America behind you!!!!!!!


122 posted on 09/18/2009 3:15:48 AM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
These documents are FACTS and they went unimpeached, unquestioned, and yet utterly unaddressed in this Court’s order of summary dismissal. The fact that the President has admitted his Father was not a citizen, but a British Subject, at the time of birth, is an incontrovertible fact, which supports Plaintiff’s charges that the President is an alien.

Bingo. But the fact is that Judge Land and those who applaud the actions of this illegal pretender are not interested in facts. They revel in the fantasies of Obama's making. While they think that they will be rewarded for their accommodations, they will instead one day pay a hefty price for it.

130 posted on 09/18/2009 6:07:21 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; All
Get a load of this:

Letter from Captain Rhodes denying she gave Taitz approval to file another TRO

151 posted on 09/18/2009 2:45:35 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson