Good
1 posted on
09/17/2009 2:08:07 PM PDT by
pissant
To: pissant
To: LucyT
3 posted on
09/17/2009 2:11:45 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
If Captain Rhodes fully complies with her military orders in every way can she request the military courts to review the legitimacy of her orders?
4 posted on
09/17/2009 2:12:32 PM PDT by
wintertime
(People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
To: pissant
the evidence objected to by Land, concerning Social Security Numbers was gathered by a famous detective of Scotland Yard There's those pesky SSNs again. And, the result of a Scotlnad Yard (MI5?) investigation, to boot.I'm really curious about those...maybe more than the LF/BC.
7 posted on
09/17/2009 2:16:11 PM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
To: pissant
First she accuses Chief Justice Roberts of allowing criminal activities to be ongoing in the SCOTUS and now she’s deriding this Judge... The outcome at some point is going to be interesting if she continues.
8 posted on
09/17/2009 2:17:56 PM PDT by
deport
To: pissant; LucyT
This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation. A monumental statement.
10 posted on
09/17/2009 2:32:42 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(fair dinkum)
To: pissant
It's hard to imagine any “conspiracy theory” being easier to disprove, than the questions about BHO’s Constitutional qualifications for office. That's why I lend it credence.
Perhaps, it didn't start out as a conspiracy. It's entirely possible that BHO, acting alone, chose to falsify his “natural born” citizen status.
However, as this drags on, more and more people are at least guilty of willful nonfeasance, for insisting on a proper vetting. These people aren't “conspirators”; but, they could be enabling a conspiracy.
Of course, if BHO is actually qualified for his Office, then there has been no conspiracy — unless, it's a conspiracy to play rope-a-dope with the “birthers”.
The release of one, simple, original government-issued document would settle the matter.
To: pissant
With all due respect to my fellow freepers, this is an example of how hard it is to pursue a frivolous lawsuit in court. Judges will do these kinds of things to you.
parsy, who says remember this the next time you start hollering about frivolous claims in malpractice tort issues
15 posted on
09/17/2009 2:50:44 PM PDT by
parsifal
(Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
To: pissant
17 posted on
09/17/2009 3:14:40 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
To: pissant
Judge Clay D. Land was
nominated by President George W. Bush on September 21, 2001, to a seat vacated by J. Robert Elliot. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on December 13, 2001, and received his commission on December 21, 2001.
Something is truly up with this for so many to participate in this cover up.
To: pissant; All
Well Judge Land rule on this new motion? If so, what good is it. Shouldn’t it be seen by another judge to at least give the appearance of impartiality?
20 posted on
09/17/2009 3:39:43 PM PDT by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
To: pissant
"Ex Parte meetings Rule! Long live tyrants! Death to the American Constitution."
28 posted on
09/17/2009 4:00:48 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: pissant
Any judge who grants standing will no longer be sitting.
39 posted on
09/17/2009 5:29:27 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: pissant
Yesterday, Judge Clay D. Land garnered nationally notoriety for his rejection of Captains Rhodes case, with a severe ruling that was widely faulted by legal experts across the nation. What legal experts?
To: pissant
With this motion, Dr. Taitz is likely in violation of the court’s order not to file more frivilous motions in this court. It will be interesting to see how the good judge reacts to this, especially considering some of the rather abrasive wording of her new motion.
82 posted on
09/17/2009 7:06:20 PM PDT by
DaGman
To: pissant
"Yesterday, Judge Clay D. Land garnered nationally notoriety for his rejection of Captains Rhodes case, with a severe ruling that was widely faulted by legal experts across the nation." Oh really?
Where is a list of these many experts?
93 posted on
09/17/2009 7:24:43 PM PDT by
mlo
To: pissant
Obviously ‘Judge’ Land is just another Black Collar Criminal.
It should be fairly easy after this to have him removed due to his exposed bias.
112 posted on
09/17/2009 8:19:02 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: pissant
Lay it on Orly. You have more than half of America behind you!!!!!!!
122 posted on
09/18/2009 3:15:48 AM PDT by
Candor7
(The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
To: pissant
These documents are FACTS and they went unimpeached, unquestioned, and yet utterly unaddressed in this Courts order of summary dismissal. The fact that the President has admitted his Father was not a citizen, but a British Subject, at the time of birth, is an incontrovertible fact, which supports Plaintiffs charges that the President is an alien.Bingo. But the fact is that Judge Land and those who applaud the actions of this illegal pretender are not interested in facts. They revel in the fantasies of Obama's making. While they think that they will be rewarded for their accommodations, they will instead one day pay a hefty price for it.
130 posted on
09/18/2009 6:07:21 AM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: pissant; All
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson