. . . . update.
Posted on 09/13/2009 12:50:26 PM PDT by American Dream 246
The Count Us Out blog reports that a U.S. District Court hearing, scheduled for Friday in Georgia, has been rescheduled for Monday.
Capt. Connie Rhodes is fighting deployment to Afghanistan until Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS is established. Dr. Orly Taitz filed the complaint last week and Judge Clay Land granted an emergency hearing Friday afternoon in the Columbus federal courthouse.
Rhodes, a medical doctor who was with her unit in Fort Riley, Kan., did not attend the hearing because she was ordered by her commanding officer not to leave Kansas. That prompted Land to reschedule it for noon Monday. Rhodes was scheduled to arrive at Fort Benning today and deploy within seven days.
Rhodes’ attorney Orly Taitz was in Land’s court.
UPFATE: Dr. Orly Taitz, "We had a hearing on 11th. Defendants (that's Obama and others) were represented by 3 attorneys: a US attorney, a Pentagon attorney and a Fort Benning attorney. They claimed that my client, flight surgeon Cpt. Rhodes, MD, didn’t show up for no reason, she just didn’t feel like coming."
"I presented to the judge a notarized statement, showing that Col. Jeffrey Johnson, her commander from Fort Riley, KS, has forbidden Connie from leaving Fort Riley a day early and she was threatened that if she does, she will be court-martialed and can be thrown into military prison. In this fashion the government prevented Connie from being at her own hearing and 5 minutes before the hearing they served me with the motion to dismiss."
"Judge Land did not appreciate this strong hand tactic of the government and he ordered the government to make sure Connie is able to leave the base to be at her hearing, which was scheduled for Monday at 12 noon. This time it is their responsibility to do whatever is necessary for Connie to be in court."
I still want to know why civil servants are doing representing the Usurper. What happened to his legion of civilian attorneys? Isn't he paying them? Did they quit?
Looks like the “powers that be” are desperate. Maybe Obama is not eligable after all. Otherwise why would they be going through all these machinations?
pingo
. . . . update.
Of you are getting flak, you are over the target...
That is, IF you are getting flak, you are over the target...
MOAB...on target...release.....enjoy.
check this out...I have not had a chance to read it put looks interesting about: The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583
from the Obama file 9/13/09
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
New Hampshire To Investigate Obama’s Eligibility
New Hampshire State Representative, Lawrence M. Rappaport paid a visit to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State, on Thursday, Sept. 10th.
His stunning request: an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama’s presence on the NH 2008 Ballot.
Gardner’s stunning response: “an investigation will commence.”
John Charlton interviewed Mr. Rappaport by email, and asked him, on what basis did he make his complaint; he responded, “The basis for all of this is possible fraud. I don’t know what penalties will be assessed if fraud is proven.”
Rappaport’s action follows stunning revelations that Nancy Pelosi deliberately signed two different forms certifying Barack Hussein Obama was the Democratic National Party candidate for the presidency. While these forms have been known to exist for some time, it was J.B. Williams, writing for the Canadian Free Press who brought them national notoriety, earlier this week.
It is unclear, if, in the eventuality that New Hampshire determines fraud was committed, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, if the State will move, through its governor, to take some sort of action on the national scene, or who would be liable in law for the crime committed in-state.
It is a long article which details the strange issuance of two very different documents from the DNC signed off on by Pelosi and Dean. The essence is that one states Barry is constitutionally eligible, the other omits the constitutional eligibility aprt. Both were notarized and issued the same day, but why?
Wow, I can’t wait to see what happens on this one.
THX THX.
INCREDIBLE.
We have certainly descended into the rabbit hole and the Red King is stomping about . . . as is his self-aggrandizing Red Queen.
[not the one doing limo knee duty, BTW]
Thanks Lucy, but Dr. Rhodes is treading on egg shells here and I’d hate to see her in trouble for Missing Movement.
Colonel Holister’s case would seem to be the answer.
Perhaps Col Johnson can point the finger further up the chain of command. Someone has to bite the bullet of responsibility for the origin of this order.
Obie is gonna push as many career Officers as possible to make a decision between Him and their constitutional obligations. Count on it. He can’t a risk a Honduras like situation.
WOW!!!! Get these thugs out of the White House. He’s hiding something and it must be huge!
Unbelievable isn’t it? What in the hell is he hiding besides his entire past?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.