Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie
RightSideNews.com ^ | September 10, 2009 | JB Williams

Posted on 09/10/2009 7:18:19 PM PDT by khnyny

Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled "conspiracy theories" by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.

While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy" out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors - it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.

To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a "conspiracy." Not in theory, but in reality.

Such is the case today!

A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many - many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.

They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...

They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, "drive-by media" caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; dnc; frmodssuck; glennbeck; obama; pelosi; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Albion Wilde
Eventually, most probably after most of the damage has been done to really bring this country's economy and infrastructures to a halt, someone in high places will force the issue.
We should remember Richardson's comment in effect saying zero was a (I believe he used the term) immigrant, during the campaign. The statement meet with deaf ears from all corners of the globe.
41 posted on 09/11/2009 6:29:34 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Wait a minute. Have we jump the gun here again? Are we being duped again? I have read all of the postings here, and I too would like to believe this story is factual as anybody else. But my reading of Word Press article suggests that the reason why two DNC "Certification of Nomination" documents were signed is because different states require different wording. Some states require a qualification clause, some do not. It may be just that simple. ex animo davidfarrar
42 posted on 09/11/2009 7:06:35 AM PDT by DavidFarrar (davidfarrar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
If he's impeached before she can appoint a Vice President and have him confirmed, then the President would either be whoever replaces her as Speaker of the House, probably Steny Hoyer, or, if she hasn't been replaced by then, the President Pro Tem of the Senate, Robert Byrd.

Proving that she committed election fraud would be difficult, however. Assuming Obama was not qualified to be President, the best explanation for the omission in the Certificate of Nomination would be to protect the signatories from perjury charges.
43 posted on 09/11/2009 9:00:15 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

Bump! Has Orly Taitz mentioned this anywhere? Pretty weird ... ;-(


44 posted on 09/11/2009 9:53:21 AM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

Actually, both the McCain and Obama campaigns failed to meet the requirements to be on the ballot for Texas, for example.


45 posted on 09/13/2009 1:18:52 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
As an aside, the blogger has misquoted the Democratic documents. The blogger writes "the Democrat Party", but the scanned documents have "the Democratic Party".

That jumped out at me, too.

46 posted on 09/13/2009 1:20:28 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson